Advertisement

Ionics

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 607–616 | Cite as

h-MoO3/Activated carbon nanocomposites for electrochemical applications

  • D. N. Sangeetha
  • D. Krishna Bhat
  • M. SelvakumarEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

MoO3 nanorods were synthesized through the microwave method and the nanocomposites of MoO3/activated carbon were prepared for supercapacitor and hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). The XRD pattern revealed that the prepared MoO3 has a hexagonal phase (h-MoO3). The as-prepared h-MoO3 was composited with activated carbon (AC) and tested for supercapacitor studies. The fabricated supercapacitor exhibited an appreciable specific capacitance, power density, and energy densities. Further, dedoping of nitrogen in the doped AC creates defects on AC (DAC). These DAC/MoO3 nanocomposites were prepared and tested for its electrocatalytic activity towards hydrogen evolution reactions. DAC/MoO3 nanocomposite showed much higher electrocatalytic activity than the neat MoO3.

Graphical Abstract

Microwave synthesized h-MoO3 and active/defective activated carbon composites for supercapacitor and hydrogen evolution reactions

Keywords

h-MoO3 Supercapacitors Specific capacitance Hydrogen evolution reactions 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges Manipal Academy of Higher Education for the research fellowship, the laboratory, and instrumentation facilities. Also, the authors are thankful to the Sophisticated Analytical Instrument Facility, IIT-Bombay, and Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur for the characterization facility.

References

  1. 1.
    Winter M, Brodd RJ (2005) What are batteries, fuel cells, and supercapacitors? Chem Rev 105:4245–4269Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eftekhari A, Fang B (2017) Electrochemical hydrogen storage: opportunities for fuel storage, batteries, fuel cells, and supercapacitors. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:25143–25165Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davies A, Yu A (2011) Material advancements in supercapacitors: from activated carbon to carbon nanotube and graphene. Can J Chem Eng 89:1342–1357Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gu W, Yushin G (2014) Review of nanostructured carbon materials for electrochemical capacitor applications: advantages and limitations of activated carbon, carbide-derived carbon, zeolite-templated carbon, carbon aerogels, carbon nanotubes, onion-like carbon, and graphene. WIREs Energy Environ 3:424–473Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang Q, Uchaker E, Candelaria SL, Cao G (2013) Nanomaterials for energy conversion and storage. Chem Soc Rev 42:3127–3171Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yan J, Wang Q, Wei T, Fan Z (2014) Recent advances in design and fabrication of electrochemical supercapacitors with high energy densities. Adv Energy Mater 4:1300816Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tang J, Yamauchi Y (2016) MOF morphologies in control. Nat Chem 8:638–639Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Salunkhe RR, Lee Y-H, Chang K-H, Li J-M, Simon P, Tang J, Torad NL, Hu C-C, Yamauchi Y (2014) Nanoarchitectured graphene-based supercapacitors for next-generation energy-storage applications. Chem Eur J 20:13838–13852Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang G, Zhang L, Zhang J (2012) A review of electrode materials for electrochemical supercapacitors. Chem Soc Rev 41:797–828Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pang H, Zhang GX, Xiao X, Li B, Gu P, Xue HG (2017) Transition metal oxides with one-dimensional/one-dimensional-analog nanostructures for advanced supercapacitors. J Mater Chem A 5:8155–8186Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zou X, Zhang Y (2015) Noble metal-free hydrogen evolution catalysts for water splitting. Chem Soc Rev 44:5148–5180Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Faber MS, Jin S (2014) Earth-abundant inorganic electrocatalysts and their nanostructures for energy conversion applications. Energy Environ Sci 7:3519–3542Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ostafiychuk BK, Budzulyak IM, Rachiy BI, Vashchynsky VM, Mandzyuk VI, Lisovsky RP, Shyyko LO (2015) Thermochemically activated carbon as an electrode material for supercapacitors. Nanoscale Res Lett 10:65Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wei L, Sevilla M, Fuertes AB, Mokaya R, Yushin G (2011) Hydrothermal carbonization of abundant renewable natural organic chemicals for high-performance supercapacitor electrodes. Adv Energy Mater 1:356–361Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pinero ER, Cadek M, Beguin F (2009) Tuning carbon materials for supercapacitors by direct pyrolysis of seaweeds. Adv Funct Mater 19:1032–1039Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Karnan M, Subramania K, Srividhya PK, Sathish M (2017) Electrochemical studies on corncob derived activated porous carbon for supercapacitors application in aqueous and non-aqueous electrolytes. Electrochim Acta 228:586–596Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xu B, Hou S, Cao G, Wu F, Yang Y (2012) Sustainable nitrogen-doped porous carbon with high surface areas prepared from gelatin for supercapacitors. J Mater Chem 22:19088–19093Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li Z, Xu Z, Wang H, Ding J, Zahiri B, Holt CMB, Tanab X, Mitlin D (2014) Colossal pseudocapacitance in a high functionality–high surface area carbon anode doubles the energy of an asymmetric supercapacitor. Energy Environ 7:1708–1718Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gaoa F, Qua J, Zhaob Z, Wangb Z, Qiu J (2016) Nitrogen-doped activated carbon derived from prawn shells for high-performance supercapacitors. Electrochim Acta 190:1134–1141Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhao H, Sun C, Jin Z, Wang D-W, Yan X, Chen Z, Zhua G, Yao X (2015) Carbon for the oxygen reduction reaction: a defect mechanism. J Mater Chem A 3:11736–11739Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhao X, Zou X, Yan X, Brown CL, Chen ZG, Zhu G, Yao X (2016) Defect-driven oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) of carbon without any element doping. Inorg Chem Front 3:417–421Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Salunkhe RR, Kaneti YV, Yamauchi Y (2017) Metal-organic framework-derived nanoporous metal oxides toward supercapacitor applications: progress and prospects. ACS Nano 11:5293–5308Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Salunkhe RR, Young C, Tang J, Takei T, Ide Y, Kobayashi N, Yamauchi Y (2016) A high-performance supercapacitor cell based on ZIF-9-derived nanoporous carbon using an organic electrolyte. Chem Commun 52:4764–4767Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Salunkhe RR, Tang J, Kobayashi N, Kim J, Ide Y, Tominaka S, Kim JH, Yamauchi Y (2016) Ultrahigh performance supercapacitors utilizing core-shell, nanoarchitectures, from a metal-organic framework-derived nanoporous carbon and a conducting polyer. Chem Sci 7:5704–5713Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Teng Y, Liu K, Liu R, Yang Z, Wang L, Jiang H, Ding R, Liu E (2017) A novel copper nanoparticles/bean dregs-based activated carbon composite as pseudocapacitors. Mater Res Bull 89:33–41Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sowmya SM (2018) Multi-layered electrode materials based on polyaniline/activated carbon composites for supercapacitor applications. Int J Hydrog Energy 43:4067–4080Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Umeshbabu E, Rajeshkhanna G, Rao GR (2015) Effect of solvents on the morphology of NiCo2O4/graphene nanostructures for electrochemical pseudocapacitor application. J Solid State Electrochem 20:1837–1844Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee S-H, Kim JH, Yoon J-R (2018) Laser scribbled graphene cathode for the next generation of high-performance hybrid supercapacitors. Sci Rep 8:8179Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lee JH, Kim H-K, Baek E, Pecht M, Lee S-H, Lee Y-H (2016) Improved performance of cylindrical hybrid supercapacitor using activated carbon/niobium doped hydrogen titanate. J Power Sources 301:348–354Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lee J-H, Lee S-H (2016) Applications of novel carbon/AlPO4 hybrid-coated H2Ti12O25 as a high-performance anode for cylindrical hybrid supercapacitors. Appl Mater Interfaces 8:28974–28981Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lee B-G, Lee S-H (2017) Application of hybrid supercapacitor using granule Li4Ti5O12/activated carbon with a variation of current density. J Power Sources 342:545–549Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nagabhushana GP, Samrat D, Chandrappa GT (2014) α-MoO3 nanoparticles: solution combustion synthesis, photocatalytic and electrochemical properties. RSC Adv 4:56784–56780Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shakir I, Shahid M, Yang HW, Kang DJ (2010) Structural and electrochemical characterization of α-MoO3 nanorod-based electrochemical energy storage devices. Electrochim Acta 56:376–380Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mahmooda Q, Yun HJ, Kim WS, Park HS (2013) Highly uniform deposition of MoO3 nanodots on multiwalled carbon nanotubes for improved performance of supercapacitors. J Power Sources 235:187–192Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hanlon D, Backes C, Higgins T, Hughes JM, O'Neill A, King PJ, McEvoy N, Duesberg GS, Sanchez BM, Pettersson H, Nicolosi V, Coleman JN (2014) Production of molybdenum trioxide nanosheets by liquid exfoliation and their application in high-performance supercapacitors. Chem Mater 26:1751–1763Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tao T, Chen QY, Hu HP, Chen Y (2012) MoO3 nanoparticles distributed uniformly in a carbon matrix for supercapacitor applications. Mater Lett 66:102–105Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Thangasamy P, Ilayaraja N, Jeyakumar D, Sathish M (2017) Electrochemical cycling and beyond: unrevealed activation of MoO3 for electrochemical hydrogen evolution reactions. Chem Commun 53:2245–2248Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mahmood Q, Yun HJ, Kim WS, Park HS (2013) Highly uniform deposition of MoO3 nanorods on multiwalled carbon nanotubes for improved performance of supercapacitors. J Power Sources 235:187–192Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chen Z, Cummins D, Reinecke BN, Clark E, Sunkara MK, Jaramillo TF (2011) Core-shell MoO3-MoS2 nanowires for hydrogen evolution: a functional design for electrocatalytic materials. Nano Lett 11:4168–4175Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sangeetha DN, Selvakumar M (2018) Active-defective activated carbon/MoS2 composites for supercapacitor and hydrogen evolution reactions. Appl Surf Sci 453:132–140Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yan X, Jia Y, Odedairo T, Zhao X, Jin Z, Zhub Z, Yao X (2016) Activated carbon becomes active for oxygen reduction and hydrogen evolution reactions. Chem Commun 52:8156–8159Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sun L, Wang L, Tian C, Tan T, Xie Y, Shi K, Li M, Fu H (2012) Nitrogen-doped graphene with high nitrogen level via a one-step hydrothermal reaction of graphene oxide with urea for superior capacitive energy storage. RSC Adv 2:4498–4506Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Phuruangrat A, Hamb DJ, Thongtem S, Lee JS (2009) Electrochemical hydrogen evolution over MoO3 nanowires produced by the microwave-assisted hydrothermal reaction. Electrochem Commun 11:1740–1743Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Pan W, Tian R, Jin H, Guo Y, Zhang L, Wu X, Zhang L, Han Z, Liu Z, Li J, Rao G, Wang H, Chu W (2010) Structure, optical, and catalytic properties of novel hexagonal metastable h-MoO3 nano- and microrods synthesised with modified liquid-phase processes. Chem Mater 22:6202–6208Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Chithambararaj A, Bose AC (2011) Investigation on structural, thermal, optical and sensing properties of meta-stable hexagonal MoO3 nanocrystals of the one-dimensional structure. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 2:585–592Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ramana CV, Atuchin VV, Troitskaia IB, Gromilov SA, Kostrovsky VG, Saupe GB (2009) Low-temperature synthesis of morphology-controlled metastable hexagonal molybdenum trioxide (MoO3). Solid State Commun 149:6–9Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Chithambararaj A, Yogamalar NR, Bose AC (2016) Hydrothermally synthesized h-MoO3 and α-MoO3 nanocrystals: new findings on crystal-structure-dependent charge transport. Cryst Growth Des 16:1984–1995Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mai L-Q, Yang F, Zhao Y-L, Xu X, Xu L, Luo Y-Z (2011) Hierarchical MnMoO4/CoMoO4 heterostructured nanowires with enhanced supercapacitor performance. Nat Commun 2:381Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sudhakar YN, Hemant H, Nitinkumar SS, Poornesh P, Selvakumar M (2016) Green synthesis and electrochemical characterization of rGO-CuO nanocomposites for supercapacitor applications. Ionics 23:1267–1276Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Peng H, Ma G, Mu J, Sunb K, Lei Z (2014) Low-cost and high energy density asymmetric supercapacitors based on polyaniline nanotubes and MoO3 nanobelts. J Mater Chem A 2:10384–10388Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zhang X, Zeng X, Yang M, Qi Y (2014) Investigation of a branchlike MoO3/polypyrrole hybrid with enhanced electrochemical performance used as an electrode in supercapacitors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:1125–1130Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ji H, Liu X, Liu Z, Yan B, Chen L, Xie Y, Liu C, Hou W, Yang G (2015) In situ preparation of sandwich MoO3/C hybrid nanostructures for high-rate and ultralong-life supercapacitors. Adv Funct Mater 25:1886–1894Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Chang J, Jin M, Yao F, Kim TH, Le VT, Yue H, Gunes F, Li B, Ghosh A, Xie S, Lee YH (2013) Asymmetric supercapacitors based on graphene/MnO2 nanospheres and graphene/MoO3 nanosheets with high energy density. Adv Funct Mater 23:5074–5083Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Pujari RB, Lokhande VC, Kumbhar VS, Chodankar NR, Lokhande CD (2016) Hexagonal microrods architecture MoO3 thin film for supercapacitor application. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 27:3312–3317Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Jiang J, Liu J, Peng S, Qian D, Luo D, Wang Q, Tiana Z, Liu Y (2013) Facile synthesis of α-MoO3 nanobelts and their pseudocapacitive behavior in an aqueous Li2SO4 solution. J Mater Chem A 1:2588–2594Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Taberna PL, Simon P, Fauvarque JF (2003) Electrochemical characteristics and impedance spectroscopy studies of carbon – carbon supercapacitors. J Electrochem Soc 15:A292–A300Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sudhakar YN, Selvakumar M, Bhat DK (2013) LiClO4-doped plasticized chitosan and poly (ethylene glycol) blend as biodegradable polymer electrolyte for supercapacitors. Ionics 19:277–285Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Conway BE, Tilak BV (2002) Interfacial processes involving electrocatalytic evolution and oxidation of H2, and the role of chemisorbed H. Electrochim Acta 47:3571–3594Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Lennon D, Lundie DT, Jackson SD, Kelly GJ, Parker SF (2002) Characterization of activated carbon using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and inelastic neutron scattering spectroscopy. Langmuir 18:4667–4673Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. N. Sangeetha
    • 1
  • D. Krishna Bhat
    • 2
  • M. Selvakumar
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, Manipal Institute of TechnologyManipal Academy of Higher EducationManipalIndia
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryNational Institute of TechnologySurathkalIndia

Personalised recommendations