Advertisement

Ionics

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 747–761 | Cite as

Incident photon-to-current efficiency of thermally treated SWCNTs-based nanocomposite for dye-sensitized solar cell

  • Savisha MahalingamEmail author
  • Huda Abdullah
  • Nowshad Amin
  • Abreeza Manap
Original Paper
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

This study focuses on incident photon-to-current efficiency (IPCE) performance of In2O3-SWCNTs for dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC) application. The thin films were prepared by sol-gel method using spin-coating technique annealed at 400, 450, 500, 550, and 600 °C. Morphology transition of In2O3 from spherical to cubic and then octahedral structure occurred as the annealing temperature rises. The photoanode annealed at 450 °C (cubic structure) provides a stable phase of cubic structure with large surface area and optimum thickness for effective dye adsorption. However, the IPCE value does not solely depends on the dye adsorption of photoanodes (light harvesting efficiency (LHE)) but the electron injection efficiency (ηinj) and the collection efficiency (ηcoll). Smaller energy bandgap of photoanodes favors the injected electrons with higher driving force to the conduction band (CB) of the photoanode, which in turn increases the ηinj from the LUMO of dye to the In2O3-SWCNTs CB. Besides that, the absence of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) above 500 °C caused the energy bandgap to increase and leads to lower driving force of injected electrons. In addition, SWCNTs are capable of absorbing visible light faster than other materials. Therefore, the cubic structure-based photoanode (450 °C) exhibited better electron transport with larger driving force on injected electron (ηinj) that decreased the electron recombination rate and increased electron lifetime and subsequently obtained larger charge collection efficiency (ηcoll) of almost 99%. Consequently, the IPCE performance of DSSC was enhanced.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Dye-sensitized solar cell In2O3 Single-walled carbon nanotubes Thermal stability IPCE 

References

  1. 1.
    O’Regan B, Grätzel M (1991) A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 353:737–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mahalingam S, Abdullah H, Ashaari I, Shaari S, Muchtar A (2016) Optical, morphology and electrical properties of In2O3 incorporating acid-treated single-walled carbon nanotubes based DSSC. J Phys D Appl Phys 49:075601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mahalingam S, Abdullah H, Razali MZ, Yarmo MA, Shaari S, Omar A (2016) Structural, morphological, photovoltaic and electron transport properties of ZnO based DSSC with different concentrations of MWCNTs. Mater Sci Forum 846Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abdullah H, Atiqah NA, Omar A, Asshaari I, Mahalingam S, Razali Z, Shaari S, Mandeep JS, Misran H (2015) Structural, morphological, electrical and electron transport studies in ZnO–rGO (wt%= 0.01, 0.05 and 0.1) based dye-sensitized solar cell. J Mater Sci-Mater Electron 26:2263–2270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mahalingam S, Abdullah H, Omar A, Nawi NAM, Shaari S, Muchtar A, Asshari I (2016) Effect of morphology on SnO2/MWCNT-based DSSC performance with various annealing temperatures. Adv Mater Res 1107:649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abdullah H, Yunos NH, Mahalingam S, Ahmad M, Yuliarto B (2017) Photovoltaic and EIS performance of SnO2/SWCNTS based–sensitized solar cell. Procedia Engineer 170:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mahalingam S, Abdullah H, Shaari S, Muchtar A (2016) Morphological and electron mobility studies in nanograss In2O3 DSSC incorporating multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Ionics 22:1985–1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mahalingam S, Abdullah H, Manap A (2018) Role of acid-treated CNTs in chemical and electrochemical impedance study of dye-sensitised solar cell. Electrochim Acta 264:275–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mahalingam S, Abdullah H, Shaari S, Muchtar A, Asshari I (2015) Structural, morphological, and electron transport studies of annealing dependent In2O3 dye-sensitized solar cell. Sci World J 2015Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu T, Yu K, Gao L, Chen H, Wang N, Hao L, Li T, He H, Guo Z (2017) A graphene quantum dot decorated SrRuO3 mesoporous film as an efficient counter electrode for high-performance dye-sensitized solar cells. J Mater Chem A 5(34):17848–17855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mori S, Asano A (2010) Light intensity independent electron transport and slow charge recombination in dye-sensitized In2O3 solar cells: in contrast to the case of TiO2. J Phys Chem C 114:13113–13117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mahalingam S, Abdullah H (2016) Electron transport study of indium oxide as photoanode in DSSCs: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 63:245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hou Q, Ren J, Chen H, Yang P, Shao Q, Zhao M, Zhao X, He H, Wang N, Luo Q, Guo Z (2018) Synergistic hematite-fullerene electron-extracting layers for improved efficiency and stability in perovskite solar cells. Chem Electro Chem 5:72–731Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Luo Q, Ma H, Hou Q, Li Y, Ren J, Dai X, Yao Z, Zhou Y, Xiang L, Du H, He H (2018) All-carbon-electrode-based endurable flexible perovskite solar cells. Adv Funct Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201706777
  15. 15.
    Liu T, Mai X, Chen H, Ren J, Liu Z, Li Y, Gao L, Wang N, Zhang JX, He H, Guo Z (2018) Carbon nanotube aerogel-CoS2 hybrid catalytic counter electrodes for enhanced photovoltaic performance dye-sensitized solar cells. Nanoscale 10:4194–4201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Luo Q, Ma H, Hao F, Hou Q, Ren J, Wu L, Yao Z, Zhou Y, Wang N, Jiang K, Lin H (2017) Carbon nanotube based inverted flexible perovskite solar cells with all-inorganic charge contacts. Adv Funct Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201703068
  17. 17.
    Sun K, Fan R, Zhang Z, Shi Z, Xie P, Wang Z, Fan G, Wang N, Liu C, Li T, Guo Z (2018) An overview of metamaterials and their achievements in wireless power transfer. J Mater Chem C.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TC03384B
  18. 18.
    Guo Y, Xu G, Yang X, Ruan K, Ma T, Zhang Q, Gu J, Wu Y, Liu H, Guo Z (2018) Significantly enhanced and precisely modeled thermal conductivity in polyimide nanocomposites by chemically modified graphene via in-situ polymerization and electrospinning-hot press technology. J Mater Chem C.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TC00452H
  19. 19.
    Abdullah H, Lye SY, Mahalingam S, Asshari I, Yuliarto B, Manap A (2018) Gamma radiation induced nickel oxide/reduced graphene oxide nanoflowers for improved dye-sensitized solar cells. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 29:9643–9651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huang J, Cao Y, Shao Q, Peng X, Guo Z (2017) Magnetic nanocarbon adsorbents with enhanced hexavalent chromium removal: morphology dependence of fibrillar vs particulate structures. Ind Eng Chem Res 56:10689–10701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lin C, Hu L, Cheng C, Sun K, Guo X, Shao Q, Li J, Wang N, Guo Z (2018) Nano-TiNb2O7/carbon nanotubes composite anode for enhanced lithium-ion storage. Electrochim Acta 260:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ran F, Yang X, Shao L (2018) Recent progress in carbon-based nanoarchitectures for advanced supercapacitors. Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials 1:32–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nam JG, Park YJ, Kim BS, Lee JS (2010) Enhancement of the efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cell by utilizing carbon nanotube counter electrode. Scr Mater 62:148–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kongkanand A, Domínguez M, Kamat PV (2007) Single wall carbon nanotube scaffolds for photoelectrochemical solar cells. Capture and transport of photogenerated electrons. Nano Lett 7:676–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jang SR, Vittal R, Kim KJ (2004) Incorporation of functionalized single-wall carbon nanotubes in dye-sensitized TiO2 solar cells. Langmuir 20:9807–9810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mahalingam S, Abdullah H, Shaari S, Muchtar A (2016) Improved catalytic activity of Pt/rGO counter electrode in In2O3-based DSSC. Ionics 22:2487–2497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lu W, Liu Q, Sun Z, He J, Ezeolu C, Fang J (2008) Super crystal structures of octahedral C-In2O3 nanocrystals. J Am Chem Soc 130:6983–6991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gan J, Lu X, Wu J, Xie S, Zhai T, Yu M, Zhang Z, Mao Y, Wang SCI, Shen Y, Tong Y (2013) Oxygen vacancies promoting photoelectrochemical performance of In2O3 nanocubes. Sci Rep 3:1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Berki P, Nemeth Z, Reti B, Berkesi O, Magrez A, Aroutiounian V, Forro L, Hernadi K (2013) Preparation and characterization of multiwalled carbon nanotube/In2O3 composites. Carbon 60:266–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sönmezoğlu S, Çankaya G, Serin N (2012) Influence of annealing temperature on structural, morphological and optical properties of nanostructured TiO2 thin films. Mater Technol 27:251–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mahalingam S, Abdullah H, Ashaari I, Shaari S, Muchtar A (2016) Influence of heat treatment process in In2O3-MWCNTs as photoanode in DSSCs. Ionics 22:711–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kao MC, Chen HZ, Young SL, Kung CY, Lin CC (2009) The effects of the thickness of TiO2 films on the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Thin Solid Films 517:5096–5099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hamadanian M, Gravand A, Farangi M, Jabbari V (2011) The effect of the thickness of nanoporous TiO2 film on the nanocrystalline dye-sensitized solar cell, in: 5th symposium on advances in science and technology, Mashad, Iran, 12–17 May 2011Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lu L, Li R, Fan K, Peng T (2010) Effects of annealing conditions on the photoelectrochemical properties of dye-sensitized solar cells made with ZnO nanoparticles. Sol Energy 84:844–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Huang Y, Li D, Feng J, Li G, Zhang Q (2010) Transparent conductive tungsten-doped tin oxide thin films synthesized by sol-gel technique on quartz glass substrates. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 54:276–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jamal EMA, Sakthi Kumar D, Anantharaman MR (2011) On structural, optical and dielectric properties of zinc aluminate nanoparticles. Bull Mater Sci 34:251–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bahr JL, Yang J, Kosynkin DV, Bronikowski MJ, Smalley RE, Tour JM (2001) Functionalization of carbon nanotubes by electrochemical reduction of aryl diazonium salts: a bucky paper electrode. J Am Chem Soc 123:6536–6542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sinani VA, Gheith MK, Yaroslavov AA, Rakhnyanskaya AA, Sun K, Mamedov AA, Wicksted JP, Kotov NA (2005) Aqueous dispersions of single-wall and multiwall carbon nanotubes with designed amphiphilic polycations. J Am Chem Soc 127:3463–3472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Baxter JB, Ayedil ES (2006) Dye-sensitized solar cells based on semiconductor morphologies with ZnO nanowires. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 90:607–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hara K, Zhao ZG, Cui Y, Miyauchi M, Miyashita M, Mori S (2011) Nanocrystalline electrodes based on nanoporous-walled WO3 nanotubes for organic-dye-sensitized solar cells. Langmuir 27:12730–12736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sariket D, Shyamal S, Hajra P, Mandal H, Bera A, Maity A, Bhattacharya C (2018) Improvement of photocatalytic activity of surfactant modified In2O3 towards environmental remediation. New J Chem 42:2467–2475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bisquert J (2002) Theory of the impedance of electron diffusion and recombination in a thin layer. J Phys Chem B 106:325–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ariyanto NP, Abdullah H, Syarif J, Yuliarto B, Shaari S (2010) Fabrication of zinc oxide-based dye-sensitized solar cell by chemical bath deposition. Funct Mater Lett 3:303–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zhang B, Zhang NN, Chen JF, Hou Y, Yang S, Guo JW, Yang XH, Zhong JH, Wang HF, Hu P, Zhao HJ (2013) Turning indium oxide into a superior electrocatalyst: deterministic heteroatoms. Sci Rep 3:3109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nalwa HS (1996) Encyclopedia of nanoscience and nanotechnology. American Scientific, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hara K, Horiguchi T, Kinoshita T, Sayama K, Sugihara H, Arakawa H (2000) Highly efficient photon-to-electron conversion with mercurochrome-sensitized nanoporous oxide semiconductor solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 64:115–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Omar A, Abdullah H, Yarmo MA, Shaari S, Taha MR (2013) Morphological and electron transport studies in ZnO dye-sensitized solar cells incorporating multi-and single-walled carbon nanotubes. J Phys D Appl Phys 46:165503CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Savisha Mahalingam
    • 1
    Email author
  • Huda Abdullah
    • 2
  • Nowshad Amin
    • 2
  • Abreeza Manap
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Sustainable Energy (ISE)Universiti Tenaga NasionalKajangMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Electrical, Electronic and System Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built EnvironmentUniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaBangiMalaysia
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringUniversiti Tenaga NasionalKajangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations