Advertisement

Ionics

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 1789–1801 | Cite as

Fabrication of novel electrodialysis heterogeneous ion exchange membranes by incorporating PANI/GO functionalized composite nanoplates

  • S. M. Hosseini
  • E. Jashni
  • M. Habibi
  • B. Van der BruggenEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Novel mixed-matrix electrodialysis heterogeneous ion exchange membranes were fabricated using polyaniline (PANI)-co-graphene oxide (GO) functionalized composite nanoplates. The PANI-co-GO functionalized composite nanoplates were prepared by in situ chemical oxidative polymerization of aniline in the presence of GO nanoplates. The synthesized PANI/GO were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy. The SEM images demonstrated that utilizing of PANI/GO in membrane matrix led to formation of membranes with a compact structure. Also, more uniform distribution was observed for the incorporated PANI/GO membrane compared to the embedded GO nanoplates ones. The surface hydrophilicity, water content, and ion exchange capacity were enhanced by utilizing PANI/GO composite nanoplates. The membrane potential, transport number, and selectivity were also enhanced in sodium and barium chloride ionic solutions in presence of functionalized nanoplates. The newly prepared membranes showed lower selectivity and transport number for barium ions compared to sodium ions. The sodium and barium flux were enhanced by using PANI/GO. Dialytic rate results showed that modified membranes in this study have good ability in lead ion removal from wastewater. The enhancement in lead flux was more than 50% for the modified membrane containing PANI/GO in comparison with pristine ones.

Keywords

Electrodialysis Mixed matrix PANI-co-GO functionalized composite nanoplates Lead removal Structural property 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Arak University for the financial support during this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Malek P, Ortiz JM, Schulte-Herbruggen HMA (2016) Decentralized desalination of brackish water using an electrodialysis system directly powered by wind energy. Desalination 377:54–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allioux F, He L, She F, Hodgson P, Kong L, Dumee L (2015) Investigation of hybrid ion-exchange membranes reinforced with non-woven metal meshes for electro-dialysis applications. Separation and Purification Technology 147:353–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bialek R, Mitko K, Dydo P, Turek M (2014) Electrodialytic separation of boric and hydrochloric acids. Desalination 342:29–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tran ATK, Mondal P, Lin J, Meesschaert B, Pinoy L, Van der Bruggen B (2015) Simultaneous regeneration of inorganic acid and base form a metal washing step wastewater by bipolar membrane electrodialysis after pretreatment by crystallization in a fluidized pellet reactor. J Membr Sci 473:118–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guo H, You F, Yu S, Li L, Zhao D (2015) Mechanisms of chemical cleaning of ion exchange membranes: a case study of plant-scale electrodialysis for oily wastewater treatment. J Membr Sci 496:310–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Strathmann H (2004) Ion-exchange membrane separation processes. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xu T, Huang C (2008) Electrodialysis-based separation technologies: a critical review. AlChE Journal 54:3147–3159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wisniewski JA, Kabsch-Korbutowicz M, Lakomska S (2014) Ion-exchange membrane processes for Br- and Bro3-ion removal from water and for recovery of salt from waste solution. Desalination 342:175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Strathmann H (2010) Electrodialysis, a mature technology with a multitude of new applications. Desalination 264:268–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mikhaylin S, Bazinet L (2016) Fouling on ion-exchange membranes: classification. Characterization and strategies of prevention and control, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 229:34–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dlugolecki P, Anet B, Metz SJ, Nijmeijer K, Wessling M (2010) Transport limitations in ion exchange membranes at low salt concentrations. J Membr Sci 364:163–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elattar A, Elmidaoui A, Pismenskaia N, Gavach C, Pourcelly G (1998) Comparison of transport properties of monovalent anions through anion-exchange membranes. J Membr Sci 143:249–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shahi VK, Trivedi G, Thampy S, Rangarajan R (2003) Studies on the electrochemical and permeation characteristics of the asymmetric charged porous membranes. J Colloid Interface Sci 262:566–573CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nagarale RK, Gohil GS, Shahi VK, Trivedi GS, Rangarajan R (2004) Preparation and electrochemical characterization of cation- and anion- exchange/polyaniline composite membranes. J Colloid Interface Sci 277:162–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schauer J, Brozova L (2005) Heterogeneous ion-exchange membranes based on sulfonated poly (1,4-phenylene sulfide) and linear polyethylene: preparation, oxidation stability, methanol permeability and electrochemical properties. J Membr Sci 250:151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baker RW (2004) Membrane technology and applications, 2nd edn. Wiley, EnglandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marder L, Navarro EMO, Herranz VP, Bernardes AM, Ferreira JZ (2006) Evaluation of transition metals transport properties through a cation-exchange membrane by chronopotentiometry. J Membr Sci 284:267–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hosseini SM, Gholami A, Koranian P, Nemati M, Madaeni SS, Moghadassi AR (2014) Electrochemical characterization of mixed matrix heterogeneous cation exchange membrane modified by aluminum oxide nanoparticles: mono/bivalent ionic transportation. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 45:1241–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hosseini SM, Nemati M, Jeddi F, Salehi E, Khodabakhshi AR, Madaeni SS (2015) Fabrication of mixed matrix heterogeneous cation exchange membrane modified by titanium dioxide nanoparticle: mono/bivalent ionic transport property in desalination. Desalination 359:167–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hosseini SM, Madaeni SS, Khodabakhshi AR (2011) Preparation and characterization of heterogeneous cation exchange membranes based on S-polyvinylchloride and polycarbonate. Sep Sci Technol 46:794–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vatanpour V, Madaeni SS, Khataee AR, Salehi E, Zinadini S, Ahmadi Monfared H (2012) TiO2 embedded mixed matrix PES nanocomposite membranes: influence of different sizes and types of nanoparticles on antifouling and performance. Desalination 292:19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hosseini SM, Madaeni SS, Khodabakhshi AR, Zendehnam A (2010) Preparation and surface modification of PVC/SBR heterogeneous cation exchange membrane with silver nanoparticles by plasma treatment. J Membr Sci 365:438–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hosseini SM, Madaeni SS, Khodabakhshi AR (2010) Preparation and characterization of ABS/HIPS heterogeneous cation exchange membranes with various blend ratios of polymer binder. J Membr Sci 351:178–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Maximous N, Nakhla G, Wong K, Wan W (2010) Optimization of Al2O3/PES membranes for wastewater filtration. Sep Purif Technol 73:294–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hosseini SM, Madaeni S, Khodabakhshi A (2010) Preparation and characterization of PC/SBR heterogeneous cation exchange membrane filled with carbon nano-tube. J Membr Sci 362:550–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Parvizian F, Hosseini SM, Hamidi AR, Madaeni SS, Moghadassi AR (2014) Electrochemical characterization of mixed matrix nanocomposite ion exchange membrane modified by ZnO nanoparticles at different electrolyte conditions pH/concentration. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 45:2878–2887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Safarpour M, Khataee A, Vatanpour V (2015) Thin film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membrane modified by reduced graphene oxide/TiO2 with improved desalination performance. J Membr Sci 489:43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fan Z, Wang Z, Duan M, Wang J, Wang S (2008) Preparation and characterization of polyaniline/polysulfone nanocomposite ultrafiltration membrane. J Membr Sci 310:402–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Xu W, Peng L, Li B, Xie Z, Tong C, Liu B (2016) Areal time S1 assay at neutral pH based on graphene oxide quenched fluorescence probe. Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research 7:42–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zinadini S, Zinatizadeh AA, Rahimi M, Vatanpour V, Zangeneh H (2014) Preparation of a novel antifouling mixed matrix PES membrane by embedding graphene oxide nanoplates. J Membr Sci 453:292–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Amado FDR, Gondran E, Ferreira JZ, Rodrigues MAS, Ferreira CA (2004) Synthesis and characterization of high impact polystyrene/polyaniline composite membranes for electrodialysis. J Membr Sci 234:139–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Scherer R, Bemardes AM, C-Forte MM, Ferreira JZ, Ferreira CA (2001) Preparation and physical characterization of a sulfonated poly(styrene-co-divinylbenzene) and polypyrrole composite membrane. Mater Chem Phys 71:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Partridge AC, Milestone CB, Too CO, Wallace GG (1999) Polypyrrole based cation transport. J Membr Sci 152:61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kumar M, Ali Khan M, AlOthman ZA, Siddiqui MR (2013) Polyaniline modified organic-inorganic hybrid cation-exchange membranes for the separation of monovalent and multivalent ions. Desalination 325:95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mansour MS, Ossman ME, Farag HA (2011) Removal of Cd(II) ion from waste water by adsorption onto polyaniline coated on sawdust. Desalination 272:301–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Daraei P, Madaeni SS, Ghaemi N, Salehi E, Khadivi MA, Moradian R, Astinchap B (2012) Novel polyethersulfone nanocomposite membrane prepared by PANI/Fe3O4 nanoparticles with enhanced performance for Cu(II) removal from water. J Membr Sci 415:250–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ai L, Jiang J (2011) Ultrasonic-assisted synthesis of polyaniline nanosticks, and heavy metal uptake performance. Material Letters 65:1215–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Khan AA, Paquiza L (2011) Characterization and ion-exchange behavior of thermally stable nano-composite polyaniline zirconium titanium phosphate: its analytical application in separation of toxic metals. Desalination 265:242–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Suwal S, Doyen A, Bazinet L (2015) Characterization of protein, peptide and amino acid fouling on ion-exchange and filtration membranes: review of current and recently developed method. J Membr Sci 496:267–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hwang GJ, Ohya H, Nagai T (1999) Ion exchange membrane based on block copolymer, Part III: Preparation of cation exchange membrane. J Membr Sci 156:61–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Li X, Wang Z, Lu H, Zhao C, Na H, Zhao C (2005) Electrochemical properties of sulphonated PEEK used for ion exchange membranes. J Membr Sci 254:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nagarale RK, Shahi VK, Schubert R, Rangarajan R, Mehnert R (2004) Development of urethane acrylate composite ion-exchange membranes and their electrochemical characterization. J Colloid Interface Sci 270:446–454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nagarale RK, Shahi VK, Thampy SK, Rangarajan R (2004) Studies on electrochemical characterization of polycarbonate and polysulfone based heterogeneous cation exchange membranes. React Funct Polym 61:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Barragaan VM, Bauza CR (1999) Membrane potentials and electrolyte permeation in a cation-exchange membrane. J Membr Sci 154:261–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gohil GS, Binsu VV, Shahi VK (2006) Preparation and characterization of monovalent ion selective polypyrrole composite ion-exchange membranes. J Membr Sci 280:210–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kerres J, Cui W, Disson R, Neubrand W (1998) Development and characterization of crosslinked ionomer membranes based upon sulfinated and sulfonated PSU crosslinked PSU blend membranes by disproportionation of sulfinic acid groups. J Membr Sci 139:211–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Nagarale RK, Shahi VK, Rangarajan R (2005) Preparation of polyvinylalcohol-silica hybrid heterogeneous anion-exchange membranes by sol-gel method and their characterization. J Membr Sci 248:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hunter RJ (1966) Calculation of activity coefficient from Deby-Huckel theory. J Chem Educ 43:550–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lide DR (2006-2007) CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 87th ed. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Srinivas CH, Srinivasu D, Kavitha B, Narsimlu N, Sivakumar K (2012) Synthesis and characterization of nano size conducting polyaniline. J Appl Phys 1:12–15Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hosseini SM, Jashni E, Habibi M, Nemati M, Vander der Bruggen B (2017) Evaluating the ion transport characteristics of novel graphene oxide nanoplates entrapped mixed matrix cation exchange membranes in water deionization. J Membr Sci 541:641–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Nemati M, Hosseini SM, Shabanian M (2017) Novel electrodialysis cation exchange membrane prepared by 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid; heavy metal ions removal. J Hazard Mater 337:90–104CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hosseini SM, Ahmadi Z, Nemati M, Parvizian F, Madaeni SS (2016) Electrodialysis heterogeneous ion exchange membranes modified by SiO2 nanoparticles: fabrication and electrochemical characterization. Water Science and Technology 73/9:2074–2084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Nemati M, Hosseini SM (2016) Fabrication and electrochemical property modification of mixed matrix heterogeneous cation exchange membranes filled with Fe3O4/PAA core-shell nanoparticles. Ionics 22:899–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hosseini SM, Rafiei S, Hamidi AR, Moghadassi AR, Madaeni SS (2014) Preparation and electrochemical characterization of mixed matrix heterogeneous cation exchange membranes filled with zeolite nanoparticles: ionic transport property in desalination. Desalination 351:138–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hosseini SM, Seidypoor A, Nemati M, Madaeni SS, Parvizian F, Salehi E (2016) Mixed matrix heterogeneous cation exchange membrane filled with clay nanoparticles: membranes’ fabrication and characterization in desalination process. Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination 6(2):290–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Długołęcki P, Nymeijer K, Metz S, Wessling M (2008) Current status of ion exchange membranes for power generation from salinity gradients. J Membr Sci 319:214–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Nagarale R, Gohil G, Shahi VK (2006) Recent developments on ion-exchange membranes and electro-membrane processes. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 119:97–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Xu T (2005) Ion exchange membranes: state of their development and perspective. J Membr Sci 263:1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hosseini SM, Askari M, Koranian P, Madaeni SS, Moghadassi AR (2014) Fabrication and electrochemical characterization of PVC based electrodialysis heterogeneous cation exchange membranes filled with Fe3O4 nanoparticles. J Ind Eng Chem 20:2510–2520CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. M. Hosseini
    • 1
  • E. Jashni
    • 1
  • M. Habibi
    • 2
  • B. Van der Bruggen
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringArak UniversityArakIran
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of SciencesArak UniversityArakIran
  3. 3.Process Engineering for Sustainable Systems Section, Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  4. 4.Faculty of Engineering and the Built EnvironmentTshwane University of TechnologyPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations