Ionics

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 1195–1210 | Cite as

Supercapacitor electrodes from activation of binderless green monoliths of biomass self-adhesive carbon grains composed of varying amount of graphene additive

  • M.R.M. Jasni
  • M. Deraman
  • M. Suleman
  • Z. Zainuddin
  • M.A.R. Othman
  • C.H. Chia
  • M.A. Hashim
Original Papers
  • 90 Downloads

Abstract

Binderless electrodes of activated carbon monoliths (ACMs) and its composites with graphene are prepared by carbonization and activation of green monoliths consisting of self-adhesive carbon grains and 0–10 wt% KOH-treated graphene. Compared with ACMs, the optimized composite containing 6 wt% graphene exhibits more ordered micro-structures with increased crystallite height, and graphitic sp2 carbons (I D /I G  = 0.49 vs. 0.91) along with enhanced porosity; as revealed by X-ray diffraction, Raman, and N2 adsorption-desorption studies. These modifications lead to increased electrical conductivity (13 vs. 9 S cm−1) through improved interconnections of carbon particles by graphene, and surface area ~ (800 vs. 456 m2 g−1) due to increased inter-particle spacing. Further, contrary to ACMs, the composite electrodes can offer faster delivery of energy in almost 50% less response time (5 vs. 8 s) due to reduced equivalent series resistance (1.67 vs. 2.65 Ω) and charge transfer resistance (0.55 vs. 1.33 Ω).

Keywords

Binderless electrodes Green monoliths Activated carbon monoliths Self-adhesive carbon grains Graphene Aqueous electrolyte Energy storage 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors acknowledge the grants from the Ministry of Higher Education (FRGS/1/2016/STG07/UKM/02/2), (FRGS/2/2013/ST05/UKM/01/1), and Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (DIP-2014-027) and the support of CRIM (Centre for Research and Innovation Management), UKM. The authors are thankful to Mr. Saini for his support in the laboratory work and for the collaborative work of Department of Physics and Astrophysics, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.

Funding information

Authors acknowledge the grants from the Ministry of Higher Education (FRGS/1/2016/STG07/UKM/02/2), (FRGS/2/2013/ST05/UKM/01/1), and Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (DIP-2014-027) and the support of CRIM (Centre for Research and Innovation Management), UKM.

References

  1. 1.
    Conway BE (1999) Electrochemical supercapacitors: scientific fundamentals and technological applications. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Le VT, Kim H, Ghosh A, Kim J, Chang J, Vu A, Pham DT, Lee J, Kim S, Lee YH (2013) Coaxial fiber supercapacitor using all-carbon material electrodes. ACS Nano 7:5940–5947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miller JR, Simon P (2008) Electrochemical capacitors for energy management. Science 321:651–652Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yang CS, Jang YS, Jeong HK (2014) Bamboo-based activated carbon for supercapacitor applications. Curr Appl Phys 14:1616–1620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tey JP, Arof AK, Yarmo MA, Careem MA (2015) Activated carbon from bio - wastes of durian fruits as active material for electrodes of electric double-layer capacitors. J New Mat Electr Sys 18:1–9Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feng JC, Zhao JC, Liu P, Tang BH, Xu JL (2010) Preparation and electrochemical characterization of ordered mesoporous carbon/PbO host-guest composite electrode materials for supercapacitor. J New Mat Electr Sys 13:321–326Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gu W, Yushin G (2014) Review of nanostructured carbon materials for electrochemical capacitor applications: advantages and limitations of activated carbon, carbide-derived carbon, zeolite-templated carbon, carbon aerogels, carbon nanotubes, onion-like carbon, and graphene. Adv Rev 3:424–473Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhong C, Deng Y, Hu W, Qiao J, Zhang L, Zhang J (2015) A review of electrolyte materials and compositions for electrochemical supercapacitors. Chem Soc Rev 44:7484–7539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sevilla M, Mokaya R (2014) Energy storage applications of activated carbons: supercapacitors and hydrogen storage. Energ Environmen Sci 7:1250–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    González A, Goikolea E, Barrena JA, Mysyk R (2016) Review on supercapacitors: technologies and materials. Renew Sustainable Energy Rev 58:1189–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wen Y, Yanyan F, Dan X, Hongyan H (2015) Fabrication of microporous and mesoporous carbon spheres for high-performance supercapacitor electrode materials. Int J Energ Res 39:805–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Korenblit Y, Kajdos A, West WC, Smart MC, Brandon EJ, Kvit A, Jagiello J, Yushin G (2012) In situ studies of ion transport in microporous supercapacitor electrodes at ultralow temperatures. Adv Funct Mater 22:1655–1662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhu BY, Murali S, Cai W, Li X, Suk JW, Potts JR, Ruoff RS (2010) Graphene and graphene oxide : synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv Mater 22:3906–3924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eda BG, Chhowalla M (2010) Chemically derived graphene oxide : towards large-area thin-film electronics and optoelectronics. Adv Mater 22:2392–2415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Geim AK, Novoselov KS (2007) The rise of graphene. Progress Article 6:183–191Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Suleman M, Kumar Y, Hashmi SA (2015) High-rate supercapacitive performance of GO/r-GO electrodes interfaced with plastic-crystal-based flexible gel polymer electrolyte. Electrochim Acta 182:995–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dong X, Xu H, Wang X, Huang Y, Chan-park MB, Zhang H (2012) 3D Graphene À cobalt oxide electrode for high-performance supercapacitor and enzymeless glucose detection. ACS Nano 6:3206–3213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhu J, Cheng C, Yang X, Wang Y, Qiu L, Li D (2013) Dynamic electrosorption analysis as an effective means to characterise the structure of bulk graphene assemblies. Chem Eur J 19:3082–3089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xu Y, Lin Z, Huang X, Liu Y, Huang Y, Duan X (2013) Flexible solid-state supercapacitors based on three-dimensional graphene hydrogel films. ACS Nano 7:4042–4049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chen Y, Zhang X, Zhang H, Sun X, Zhang D, Ma Y (2012) High-performance supercapacitors based on a graphene–activated carbon composite prepared by chemical activation. RSC Adv 2:7747–7753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jiang L, Yan J, Zhou Y, Hao L, Xie R, Jiang L, Yi B (2013) Activated carbon/graphene composites with high-rate performance as electrode materials for electrochemical capacitors. J Solid State Electr 17:2949–2958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Xie Q, Bao R, Xie C, Zheng A, Wu S, Zhang Y, Zhang R, Zhao P (2016) Core-shell N-doped active carbon fiber@graphene composites for aqueous symmetric supercapacitors with high-energy and high-power density. J Power Sources 317:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zheng C, Zhou X, Cao H, Wang G, Liu Z (2014) Synthesis of porous graphene/activated carbon composite with high packing density and large specific surface area for supercapacitor electrode material. J Power Sources 258:290–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang M, Liu Q, Sun HF, Stach EA, Zhang H, Stanciu L, Xie J (2012) Preparation of high-surface-area carbon nanoparticle/graphene composites. Carbon 50:3845–3853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yan J, Wei T, Shao B, Ma F, Fan Z, Zhang M, Zheng C, Shang Y, Qian W, Wei F (2010) Electrochemical properties of graphene nanosheet/carbon black composites as electrodes for supercapacitors. Carbon 48:1731–1737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fan X, Yu C, Yang J, Ling Z, Qiu J (2014) Hydrothermal synthesis and activation of graphene-incorporated nitrogen-rich carbon composite for high-performance supercapacitors. Carbon 70:130–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Awitdtrus DM, Talib IA, Omar R, Jumali MHH, Taer E, Saman MM (2010) Microcrystallite dimension and total active surface area of carbon electrode from mixtures of pre-carbonized oil palm empty fruit bunches and green petroleum cokes. Sains Malays 39:83–86Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Farma R, Deraman M, Awitdrus A, Talib IA, Taer E, Basri NH, Manjunatha JG, Ishak MM, Dollah BNM, Hashmi SA (2013) Preparation of highly porous binderless activated carbon electrodes from fibres of oil palm empty fruit bunches for application in supercapacitors. Bioresour Technol 132:254–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jasni MRM, Deraman M, Hamdan E, Sazali NES, Nor NSM, Ishak MM, Basri NH, Omar R, Othman MAR, Zulkifli R, Daik R, Suleman M (2016) Effect of KOH treated graphene in green monoliths of pre-carbonized biomass fibers on the structure, porosity and capacitance of supercapacitors carbon electrodes. Mater Sci Forum 846:551–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jasni MRM, Deraman M, Suleman M, Hamdan E, Sazali NES, Nor NSM, Shamsudin SA (2016) Effect of nano-scale characteristics of graphene on electrochemical performance of activated carbon supercapacitor electrodes. AIP Conf Proc 1710:300341–300349Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Li Y, Zijll MV, Chiang S, Pan N (2011) KOH modified graphene nanosheets for supercapacitor electrodes. J Power Sources 196:6003–6006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Deraman M, Zakaria S, Omar R, Aziz AA (2000) Electrical conductivity of carbon pellets from mixtures of pyropolymer from oil palm bunch and cotton cellulose. Jpn J Appl Phys 39:1236–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Deraman M, Omar R, Zakaria S, Mustapa IR, Talib M, Alias N (2002) Electrical and mechanical properties of carbon pellets from acid (HNO3) treated self-adhesive carbon grain from oil palm empty fruit bunch. J Mater Sci 37:3329–3335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Deraman M, Ishak MM, Farma R, Awitdrus TE, Talib IA, Omar R (2011) Binderless composite electrode monolith from carbon nanotube and biomass carbon activated by H2SO4 and CO2 gas for supercapacitor. AIP Conf Proc 1415:175–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Taer E, Deraman M, Talib IA, Umar AA, Oyama M, Yunus RM (2010) Physical, electrochemical and supercapacitive properties of activated carbon pellets from pre-carbonized rubber wood sawdust by CO2 activation. Curr Appl Phys 10:1071–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nor NSM, Deraman M, Omar R, Awitdrus FR, Basri NH, Dolah BNM, Mamat NF, Yatim B, Daud MNM (2015) Influence of gamma irradiation exposure on the performance of supercapacitor electrodes made from oil palm empty fruit bunches. Energy 79:183–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sing KSW, Everett DH, Haul RAW, Moscou L, Pierotti RA, Rouquerol J, Siemieniewska T (1982) International Union Of Pure Commission On Colloid And Surface Chemistry Including Catalysis * Reporting physisorption data dfor gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure & Appl Chem 57:603–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhang LL, Zhou R, Zhao XS (2009) Carbon-based materials as supercapacitor electrodes. J Mater Chem 38:2520–2531Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tsay KC, Zhang L, Zhang J (2012) Effects of electrode layer composition/thickness and electrolyte concentration on both specific capacitance and energy density of supercapacitor. Electrochim Acta 60:428–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ban S, Zhang J, Zhang L, Tsay K, Song D, Zou X (2013) Charging and discharging electrochemical supercapacitors in the presence of both parallel leakage process and electrochemical decomposition of solvent. Electrochim Acta 90:542–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Basri NH, Deraman M, Kanwal S, Talib IA, Manjunatha JG, Aziz AA, Farma R (2013) Supercapacitors using binderless composite monolith electrodes from carbon nanotubes and pre-carbonized biomass residues. Biomass Bioenergy 59:370–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dolah BNM, Deraman M, Othman MAR, Farma R, Taer E, Awitdrus BNH, Talib IA, Omar R, Nor NSM (2014) A method to produce binderless supercapacitor electrode monoliths from biomass carbon and carbon nanotubes. Mater Res Bull 60:10–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Farma R, Deraman M, Awitdrus TIA, Omar R, Manjunatha JG, Ishak MM, Basri NH, Dolah BNM (2013) Physical and electrochemical properties of supercapacitor electrodes derived from carbon nanotube and biomass carbon. Int Electrochem Sc 8:257–273Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Munz M, Giusca CE, Myers-ward RL, Gaskill DK, Kazakova O (2015) Thickness-dependent hydrophobicity of epitaxial graphene. ACS Nano 9:8401–8411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Adinaveen T, Kennedy LJ, Vijaya JJ, Sekaran G (2015) Surface and porous characterization of activated carbon prepared from pyrolysis of biomass (rice straw) by two-stage procedure and its applications in supercapacitor electrodes. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 17:736–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Isroi IMM, Millati R, Syamsiah S, Cahyanto MN, Niklasson C, Taherzadeh MJ (2012) Structural changes of oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB) after fungal and phosphoric acid pretreatment. Molecules 17:14995–15012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Tongpoothorn W, Sriuttha M, Homchan P, Chanthai S, Ruangviriyachai C (2011) Chemical engineering research and design preparation of activated carbon derived from Jatropha curcas fruit shell by simple thermo-chemical activation and characterization of their physico-chemical properties. Chem Eng Res Des 89:335–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Suleman M, Othman MAR, Hashmi SA, Kumar Y, Deraman M, Omar R, Jasni MRM (2017) Activated graphene oxide/reduced graphene oxide electrodes and low viscous sulfonium cation based ionic liquid incorporated flexible gel polymer electrolyte for high rate supercapacitors. J Alloy Compd 695:3376–3392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Byrne CE, Nagle DC (1991) Carbonization of wood for advanced materials applications. Carbon 35:259–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Yan X, Liang C, Yun H (2016) KOH-assisted microwave post-treatment of activated carbon for efficient symmetrical double-layer capacitors. Int J Energ Res 41:728–735Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jain A, Tripathi SK (2014) Almond shell-based activated nanoporous carbon electrode for EDLCs. Ionics 21:1391–1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sulaiman KS, Mat A, Arof AK (2015) Activated carbon from coconut leaves for electrical double-layer capacitor. Ionics 22:911–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Deraman M, Zakaria S, Murshidi JA (2001) Estimation of crystallinity and crystallite size of cellulose in benzylated fibres of oil palm empty fruit bunches by X-ray diffraction. Jpn J Appl Phys 40:3311–3314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Deraman M, Zakaria S, Husin M, Aziz AA, Ramli R, Mokhtar A, Yusof MNM, Sahri MH (1999) X-ray diffraction studies on fiber of oil palm empty fruit bunch and rubberwood for medium-density berboard. J Mater Sci Lett 8:249–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Deraman M, Sazali NES, Hanappi MFYM, Tajuddin NSM, Hamdan E, Suleman M, Othman MAR, Omar R, Hashim MA, Basri NH, Nor NSM, Dolah BNM, Noor AM, Jasni MRM (2016) Graphene/semicrystalline-carbon derived from amylose films for supercapacitor application. J Phys Conf Ser 739:120851–120857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ng CH, Lim HN, Lim YS, Chee WK, Huang NM (2014) Fabrication of flexible polypyrrole/graphene oxide/manganese oxide supercapacitor. Int J Energ Res 39:344–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Qu D, Shi H (2002) Studies of the activated carbons used in double-layer supercapacitors. J Power Sources 109:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Nor NSM, Deraman M, Suleman M, Jasni MRM, Manjunatha JG, Othman MAR, Shamsudin SA (2017) Supercapacitors using binderless activated carbon monoliths electrodes consisting of a graphite additive and pre-carbonized biomass fibers. Int J Electrochem Sci 12:2520–2539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Liu D, Jia Z, Wang D (2016) Preparation of hierarchically porous carbon nanosheet composites with graphene conductive scaffolds for supercapacitors: an electrostatic-assistant fabrication strategy. Carbon 100:664–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Ma J, Liu Y, Hu Z, Xu Z (2013) Electrochemical synthesis and performance of PANI electrode material for electrochemical capacitor. Ionics 19:1405–1413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Venkatachalam V, Alsalme A, Alghamdi A, Jayavel R (2016) Hexagonal-like NiCo2O4 nanostructure based high-performance supercapacitor electrodes. Ionics 23:977–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Wei KC, Lim HN, Huang NM (2014) Electrochemical properties of free-standing polypyrrole/graphene oxide/zinc oxide flexible supercapacitor. Int J Energ Res 39:111–119Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Zhou S, Xie Q, Wu S, Huang X, Zhao P (2017) Influence of graphene coating on supercapacitive behavior of sandwich-like N- and O-enriched porous carbon/graphene composites in aqueous and organic electrolytes. Ionics 1:1–9Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • M.R.M. Jasni
    • 1
  • M. Deraman
    • 1
  • M. Suleman
    • 1
  • Z. Zainuddin
    • 1
  • M.A.R. Othman
    • 1
  • C.H. Chia
    • 1
  • M.A. Hashim
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Applied Physics, Faculty of Science & TechnologyUniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaBangiMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Physics, Faculty of Science & TechnologyUniversiti Sains Islam MalaysiaNilaiMalaysia

Personalised recommendations