Advertisement

Mathematics and Financial Economics

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 475–493 | Cite as

Riskiness in gambles that belong to the same location-scale family and with well-defined means and variances

  • Arritokieta Chamorro
  • José M. Usategui
Article
  • 72 Downloads

Abstract

This paper investigates the orderings of gambles with well-defined means and variances that belong to the same location-scale family under: (i) the index of riskiness analyzed by Aumann and Serrano (AS) and (ii) the measure of riskiness proposed by Foster and Hart (FH). For both measures we study the characteristics and properties of the representation on the (mean, variance) plane of the curves that include gambles with the same level of riskiness. Our analysis applies to gambles with truncated normal distributions and beta distributions. We also discuss the relationships between different riskiness measures derived from the AS and FH measures.

Keywords

Riskiness Ordering of gambles Location-scale family Truncated normal distributions Beta distributions 

JEL Classification

D81 G11 

References

  1. 1.
    Aumann, R.J., Serrano, R.: An economic index of riskiness. J. Polit. Econ. 116, 810–836 (2008)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Foster, D.P., Hart, S.: An operational measure of riskiness. J. Polit. Econ. 117(5), 785–814 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Foster, D.P., Hart, S.: A wealth requirement axiomatization of riskiness. Theor. Econ. 8, 591–620 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gupta, A.K., Nadarajah, S. (eds.): Handbook of Beta-Distributions and Its Applications. Marcel Dekker, New York (2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hellmann, T., Riedel, F.: A dynamic extension of the Foster–Hart measure of riskiness. J. Math. Econ. 59, 66–70 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Homm, U., Pigorsch, C.: An operational interpretation and existence of the Aumann–Serrano index of riskiness. Econ. Lett. 114, 265–267 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meyer, J.: Two-moment decision models and expected utility maximization. Am. Econ. Rev. 77, 421–430 (1987)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Riedel, F., Hellmann, T.: The Foster–Hart measure of riskiness for general gambles. Theor. Econ. 10(1), 1–9 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schnytzer, A., Westreich, S.: A global index of riskiness. Econ. Lett. 118, 493–496 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schulze, K.: Existence and computation of the Aumann–Serrano index of riskiness and its extension. J. Math. Econ. 50(1), 219–224 (2014a)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schulze, K.: General dual measures of riskiness. Theor. Decis. 78(2), 289–304 (2014b)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Fundamentos del Análisis Económico II and BRiDGE; Facultad de Economía y EmpresaUniversidad del País Vasco UPV/EHUBilbaoSpain

Personalised recommendations