Skip to main content
Log in

Datenanalyse in der Mixed-Methods-Forschung

Strategien der Integration von qualitativen und quantitativen Daten und Ergebnissen

Data analysis in mixed-method research

Strategies for the integration of qualitative and quantitative data and results

  • Abhandlungen
  • Published:
KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Beitrag befasst sich mit dem Problem der Datenanalyse in Mixed-Methods-Ansätzen. Die Herausforderung der Integration von qualitativem und quantitativem Forschungsstrang in der Phase der Datenanalyse ist ein wichtiger Gegenstand im Diskurs über Mixed Methods, in dessen Mittelpunkt lange Zeit Fragen des Designs und der Kompatibilität der Paradigmen standen. Der Beitrag fokussiert die Bestimmungsmomente von Integrationsstrategien sowie die Schnittstellen der Integration, die sich in Abhängigkeit vom Forschungsdesign ergeben. Es werden zehn verschiedenen Integrationsstrategien in drei Bereichen im Detail dargestellt: resultatsbasierte, datenbasierte und sequenzorientierte Integrationsstrategien. Eine besondere Bedeutung kommt dabei Joint Displays zu, welche die Daten und/oder Resultate von qualitativem und quantitativem Forschungsstrang in einer gemeinsamen Darstellung präsentieren.

Abstract

This article discusses data analysis in mixed methods approaches. The challenge of integration during the stage of analysis has recently become a main point of the discourse on mixed methods that for more than a decade had been centered on topics of research design and compatibility of paradigms. The article focuses on key aspects of integration strategies as well as on points of the integration, which depend largely on the research design of the project. Ten different integration strategies in three areas are presented in detail, namely result-based, data-based and sequence-oriented integration strategies. Joint displays, which jointly present data and/or results of the qualitative and the quantitative research strands a particularly important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  • Bazeley, Patricia. 2010. Computer assisted integration of mixed methods data sources and analysis. In SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, 431–467. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bazeley, Patricia. 2009. Editorial: Integrating data analyses in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 3:203–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazeley, Patricia. 2012. Integrative analysis strategies for mixed data sources. American Behavioral Scientist 56:814–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazeley, Patricia. 2006. The contribution of computer software to integrating qualitative and quantitative data analysis. Research in the Schools 13:63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazeley, Patricia, und Kristi Jackson. 2013. Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1989. Sozialer Raum, symbolischer Raum. In Raumtheorie. Grundlagentexte aus Philosophie und Kulturwissenschaften, Hrsg. Jörg Dünne und Stephan Günzel, 2006, 354–368. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, Alan. 2007. Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1:8–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, Alan. 2006. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Inquiry 6:97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, John W. 2015. A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, John W., und Vicki L. Plano Clark. 2011. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2. Aufl. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, Wendy B. 2010. Visual displays for mixed methods findings. In SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, 469–504. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Erzberger, Christian, und Udo Kelle. 2003. Making inferences in mixed methods: The rules of integration. In Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, Hrsg. Abbas T. Tashakorri, 457–488. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetters, Michael D., Leslie A. Curry und John W. Creswell. 2013. Achieving integration in mixed-methods-designs-principles and practices. Health Services Research 48:2134–2156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetters, Michael D., und Dawn Freshwater. 2015. Publishing a methodological mixed methods research article. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 9:203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fölling-Albers, Maria, und Katja Meidenbauer. 2010. Was erinnern Schüler/innen vom Unterricht? Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 56:229–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, Jennifer C. 2007. Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, Jennifer C., Valerie Caracelli und Wendy F. Graham. 2008. Identifying the purposes for mixed-methods-designs. In The mixed methods reader, Hrsg. Vicki L. Plano Clark und John Creswell, 121–148. Cincinnati, OH: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guetterman, Tim, John W. Creswell und Udo Kuckartz. 2015. Using joint displays and MAXQDA software to represent the results of mixed methods research. In Use of visual displays in research and testing: Coding, interpreting, and reporting data, Hrsg. Matthew McCrudden, Gregory Schraw und Chad Buckendahl, 145–176. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyvaert, Mieke, Karin Hannes, Bea Maes und Patrick Onghena. 2013. Critical appraisal of mixed-methods-studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 7:302–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda, Marie, Paul F. Lazarsfeld und Hans Zeisel. 1975. Die Arbeitslosen von Marienthal. Ein soziographischer Versuch über die Wirkungen langandauernder Arbeitslosigkeit. 25. Aufl. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. Burke, und Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie. 2004. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher 33:14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. Burke, Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie und Lisa A. Turner. 2007. Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1:112–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelle, Udo. 2007. Die Integration qualitativer und quantitativer Methoden in der empirischen Sozialforschung: theoretische Grundlagen und methodologische Konzepte. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelle, Udo, und Tanja Krones. 2010. „Evidence based Medicine“ und „Mixed Methods“ – wie methodologische Diskussionen in der Medizin und den Sozialwissenschaften voneinander profitieren könnten. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 104:630–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, Klaus H. 2012. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. 3. Aufl. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuckartz, Udo. 2014. Mixed Methods: Methodologie, Forschungsdesigns und Analyseverfahren. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuckartz, Udo. 2016. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung. 3. Aufl. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuckartz, Udo, Thorsten Dresing, Stefan Rädiker und Claus Stefer. 2008. Qualitative Evaluation: Der Einstieg in die Praxis. 2. Aufl. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippe, Holger von der. 2010. Motivation and selection processes in a biographical transition: A psychological mixed methods study on the transition into fatherhood. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 4: 199–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, Philipp. 2015. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. 12. Aufl. (zuerst 1983). Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, Philipp, Joachim König, Nils Birk und Alfred Hurst. 2000. Opfer der Einheit: eine Studie zur Lehrerarbeitslosigkeit in den neuen Bundesländern. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, David L. 2014. Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: A pragmatic approach. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, Janice M., und Linda Niehaus. 2009. Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niglas, Katrin. 2004. The combined use of qualitative and quantitative methods in educational research. Tallinn, Estonia: Tallinn Pedagogical University Dissertation on Social Sciences.

  • O’Cathain, Alicia, Elizabeth Murphy und Jon Nicholl. 2007. Integration and publications as indicators of „Yield“ from mixed-methods-studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1:147–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J., und Wendy Dickinson. 2008. Mixed methods analysis and information visualization: Graphical display for effective communication of research results. The Qualitative Report 13:204–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J., und Charles Teddlie. 2003. A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, Hrsg. Abbas Tashakkori und Charles Teddlie, 351–383. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otte, Gunnar. 2007. Körperkapital und Partnersuche in Clubs und Diskotheken. Eine ungleichheitstheoretische Perspektive. Diskurs Kindheits- und Jugendforschung. 2007:169–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plano Clark, Vicki L., Karen Schumacher, Claudia West, Janet Edrington, Laura B. Dunn, Andrea Harzstark, Michelle Melisko, Michael W. Rabow, Patrick S. Swift und Christine Miaskowski. 2013. Practices for embedding an interpretive qualitative approach within a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 7:219–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plano Clark, Vicki L., und Nataliya V. Ivankova. 2016. Mixed methods research: A guide to the field. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rössler, Patrick. 2010. Inhaltsanalyse. 2. Aufl. Konstanz: UTB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachweh, Patrick. 2013. Symbolische Grenzziehungen und subjektorientierte Sozialstrukturanalyse. Eine empirische Untersuchung aus einer Mixed-Methods-Perspektive. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 42:7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski, Margarete, Corrine Voils und George Knafl. 2009. On quantitizing. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 3:208–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoonenboom, Judith. 2014. Points of addition and points of integration: Why one point of interface is not enough. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

  • Silver, Christina, und Ann Lewins. 2014. Using software in qualitative research: A step-by-step guide. 2nd Revised edition. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, Abbas, und Charles B. Teddlie. Hrsg. 2002a. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, Abbas, und Charles B. Teddlie. 2002b. The past and future of mixed methods research: From data triangulation to mixed model designs. In Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 671–701. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie, Charles, und Abbas Tashakkori. 2009. Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver-Hightower, Marcus B. B. 2014. A mixed methods approach for identifying influence on public policy. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 8:115–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Heather B., Holly Kreider, Ellen Mayer, Margaret A. Vaughan und Rebecca Hencke. 2005. Working it out: The chronicle of a mixed-methods analysis. In Discovering successful pathways in children’s development: Mixed methods in the study of childhood and family life, Hrsg. Thomas Weisner, 47–64. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, Claire M. 2009. Meeting the mixed methods challenge of integration in a sociological study of structure and agency. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 3:7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, Robert K. 2006. Mixed methods research: Are methods genuinely integrated or merely parallel? Research in the Schools 13:41–47.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Udo Kuckartz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuckartz, U. Datenanalyse in der Mixed-Methods-Forschung. Köln Z Soziol 69 (Suppl 2), 157–183 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0456-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0456-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation