Advertisement

Export Performance in SMEs: The Importance of External Knowledge Search Strategies and Absorptive Capacity

  • José Luis Ferreras-MéndezEmail author
  • Anabel Fernández-Mesa
  • Joaquín Alegre
Research Article
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

External knowledge search strategies are considered essential for increasing export performance, a crucial goal for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in a globalised and turbulent environment. SMEs are known to have limited resources, which leads them to choose the export strategy as the best alternative for entering foreign markets. The present study analyses the link between industrial and non-industrial knowledge search strategies and export performance, taking into account absorptive capacity (AC) as a mediating variable. Results from a sample of 222 Spanish exporting SMEs reveal that orientation to collaborate with industrial partners contributes to firms’ AC and export performance. Moreover, AC is found to have a full mediating role between orientation to collaborate with industrial partners and export performance. The study makes a novel contribution by applying organisational learning theory to explain how both the strategies firms adopt to access external knowledge and their absorptive capacity affect their export performance.

Keywords

Export performance Absorptive capacity Industrial partner Non-industrial partner Knowledge search strategy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Spanish Ministry of Economics and Competitiveness (Ref. ECO2011-29863 and ECO2015-69704-R) for financial support for this research.

References

  1. Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333.Google Scholar
  2. Ahimbisibwe, G. M., Nkundabanyanga, S. K., Nkurunziza, G., & Nyamuyonjo, D. (2016). Knowledge absorptive capacity: Do all its dimensions matter for export performance of SMEs? World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 12(2), 139–160.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H. (1986). Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 1–26.Google Scholar
  4. Andersson, S. (2004). Internationalization in different industrial contexts. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(6), 851–875.Google Scholar
  5. Andersson, U., & Forsgren, M. (2002). Creation and diffusion of competence in MNCs: Structures, ties and resources at the subsidiary level. Athens: EIBA Conference Proceedings.Google Scholar
  6. Andersson, U., Holm, D. B., & Johanson, M. (2007). Moving or doing? Knowledge flow, problem solving, and change in industrial networks. Journal of Business Research, 60(1), 32–40.Google Scholar
  7. Arbussà, A., & Coenders, G. (2007). Innovation activities, use of appropriation instruments and absorptive capacity: Evidence from Spanish firms. Research Policy, 36(10), 1545–1558.Google Scholar
  8. Birkinshaw, J. M., Hamel, G., & Mol, M. J. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 825–845.Google Scholar
  9. Bonaccorsi, A. (1992). On the relationship between firm size and export intensity. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4), 605–635.Google Scholar
  10. Boso, N., Oghazi, P., Cadogan, J. W., & Story, V. M. (2016). Entrepreneurial and market-oriented activities, financial capital, environment turbulence, and export performance in an emerging economy. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 26(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  11. Boso, N., Story, V. M., Cadogan, J. W., Micevski, M., & Kadić-Maglajlić, S. (2013). Firm innovativeness and export performance: Environmental, networking, and structural contingencies. Journal of International Marketing, 21(4), 62–87.Google Scholar
  12. Caloghirou, Y., Kastelli, I., & Tsakanikas, A. (2004). Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: Complements or substitutes for innovative performance? Technovation, 24(1), 29–39.Google Scholar
  13. Carbó-Valverde, S., Rodríguez-Fernández, F., & Udell, G. F. (2016). Trade credit, the financial crisis, and SME access to finance. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 48(1), 113–143.Google Scholar
  14. Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52(1), 68–82.Google Scholar
  15. Chen, J., Chen, Y., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2011). The influence of scope, depth, and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms. Technovation, 31(8), 362–373.Google Scholar
  16. Chesbrough, H. (2012). Open innovation: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Research-Technology Management, 55(4), 20–27.Google Scholar
  17. Chin, W. W. (2001). PLS-Graph user’s guide. CT Bauer College of Business, University of Houston.Google Scholar
  18. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128.Google Scholar
  19. Contractor, F. J. (2007). Is international business good for companies? The evolutionary or multi-stage theory of internationalization vs. the transaction cost perspective. Management International Review, 47(3), 453–475.Google Scholar
  20. D’Este, P., Amara, N., & Olmos-Peñuela, J. (2016). Fostering novelty while reducing failure: Balancing the twin challenges of product innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 113, 280–292.Google Scholar
  21. Díez-Vial, I., & Fernández-Olmos, M. (2013). Internal resources, local externalities and export performance: An application in the Iberian ham cluster. Journal of Management and Organization, 19(4), 478–497.Google Scholar
  22. Eberhard, M., & Craig, J. (2013). The evolving role of organisational and personal networks in international market venturing. Journal of World Business, 48(3), 385–397.Google Scholar
  23. Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fernández-Mesa, A., & Alegre, J. (2015). Entrepreneurial orientation and export intensity: Examining the interplay of organizational learning and innovation. International Business Review, 24(1), 148–156.Google Scholar
  25. Ferreras-Méndez, J. L., Fernández-Mesa, A., & Alegre, J. (2016). The relationship between knowledge search strategies and absorptive capacity: A deeper look. Technovation, 54, 48–61.Google Scholar
  26. Ferreras-Méndez, J. L., Newell, S., Fernández-Mesa, A., & Alegre, J. (2015). Depth and breadth of external knowledge search and performance: The mediating role of absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 47, 86–97.Google Scholar
  27. Ford, D., & Håkansson, H. (2006). IMP–some things achieved: Much more to do. European Journal of Marketing, 40(3–4), 248–258.Google Scholar
  28. Ford, J. D., & Schellenberg, D. A. (1982). Conceptual issues of linkage in the assessment of organizational performance. Academy of Management Review, 7(1), 49–58.Google Scholar
  29. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382.Google Scholar
  30. Garud, R., & Nayyar, P. R. (1994). Transformative capacity: Continual structuring by intertemporal technology transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 15(5), 365–385.Google Scholar
  31. Haddoud, M. Y., Jones, P., & Newbery, R. (2017). Export promotion programmes and SMEs’ performance: Exploring the network promotion role. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 24(1), 68–87.Google Scholar
  32. Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  33. Håkansson, H., & Ford, D. (2002). How should companies interact in business networks? Journal of business research, 55(2), 133–139.Google Scholar
  34. He, X., & Wei, Y. (2013). Export market location decision and performance: The role of external networks and absorptive capacity. International Marketing Review, 30(6), 559–590.Google Scholar
  35. He, X., Zhang, J., & Wang, J. (2015). Market seeking orientation and performance in China: The impact of institutional environment, subsidiary ownership Structure and Experience. Management International Review, 55(3), 389–419.Google Scholar
  36. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In R. R. Sinkovics & P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), New challenges to international marketing (advances in international marketing) (Vol. 20, pp. 277–319). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  37. Hsieh, M. H., & Tsai, K. H. (2007). Technological capability, social capital and the launch strategy for innovative products. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(4), 493–502.Google Scholar
  38. Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 999–1015.Google Scholar
  39. Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. In B. Lundvall (Ed.), The learning economy and the economics of hope (pp. 155–182). London, New York: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  40. Jraisat, L., Gotsi, M., & Bourlakis, M. (2013). Drivers of information sharing and export performance in the Jordanian agri-food export supply chain. International Marketing Review, 30(4), 323–356.Google Scholar
  41. Katsikeas, C. S., Leonidou, L. C., & Morgan, N. A. (2000). Firm-level export performance assessment: review, evaluation, and development. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(4), 493–511.Google Scholar
  42. Khalid, S., & Bhatti, K. (2015). Entrepreneurial competence in managing partnerships and partnership knowledge exchange: Impact on performance differences in export expansion stages. Journal of World Business, 50(3), 598–608.Google Scholar
  43. Knight, G. A. (2001). Entrepreneurship and strategy in the international SME. Journal of International Management, 7(3), 155–171.Google Scholar
  44. Lages, L. F., Silva, G., & Styles, C. (2009). Relationship capabilities, quality, and innovation as determinants of export performance. Journal of International Marketing, 17(4), 47–70.Google Scholar
  45. Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 833–863.Google Scholar
  46. Lane, P. J., Salk, J. E., & Lyles, M. A. (2001). Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), 1139–1161.Google Scholar
  47. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150.Google Scholar
  48. Lee, H., Kelley, D., Lee, J., & Lee, S. (2012). SME survival: The impact of internationalization, technology. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  49. Leonidou, L. C. (2004). An analysis of the barriers hindering small business export development. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(3), 279–302.Google Scholar
  50. Lim, K. (2009). The many faces of absorptive capacity: Spillovers of copper interconnect technology for semiconductor chips. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(6), 1249–1284.Google Scholar
  51. Mariano, S., & Walter, C. (2015). The construct of absorptive capacity in knowledge management and intellectual capital research: Content and text analyses. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(2), 372–400.Google Scholar
  52. Marsh, S. J., & Stock, G. N. (2006). Creating dynamic capability: The role of intertemporal integration, knowledge retention, and interpretation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(5), 422–436.Google Scholar
  53. Martín-de Castro, G. (2015). Knowledge management and innovation in knowledge-based and high-tech industrial markets: The role of openness and absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 47, 143–146.Google Scholar
  54. Mentzer, J. T., Keebler, J. S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., & Zacharia, Z. G. (2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 1–25.Google Scholar
  55. Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R&D: Why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, 32(8), 1481–1499.Google Scholar
  56. Mol, M. J., & Birkinshaw, J. (2014). The role of external involvement in the creation of management innovations. Organization Studies, 35(9), 1287–1312.Google Scholar
  57. Morgan, N. A., Kaleka, A., & Katsikeas, C. S. (2004). Antecedents of export venture performance: A theoretical model and empirical assessment. Journal of marketing, 68(1), 90–108.Google Scholar
  58. Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 77–91.Google Scholar
  59. Murovec, N., & Prodan, I. (2009). Absorptive capacity, its determinants, and influence on innovation output: Cross-cultural validation of the structural model. Technovation, 29(12), 859–872.Google Scholar
  60. Oparaocha, G. O. (2015). SMEs and international entrepreneurship: An institutional network perspective. International Business Review, 24(5), 861–873.Google Scholar
  61. Pla-Barber, J., & Alegre, J. (2007). Analysing the link between export intensity, innovation and firm size in a science-based industry. International Business Review, 16(3), 275–293.Google Scholar
  62. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(4), 717–731.Google Scholar
  63. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.Google Scholar
  64. Rogers, M. (2004). Networks, firm size and innovation. Small Business Economics, 22(2), 141–153.Google Scholar
  65. Rothaermel, F. T., & Alexandre, M. T. (2009). Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organization Science, 20(4), 759–780.Google Scholar
  66. Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. (2004). Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 25(3), 201–221.Google Scholar
  67. Saebi, T., & Foss, N. J. (2015). Business models for open innovation: Matching heterogeneous open innovation strategies with business model dimensions. European Management Journal, 33(3), 201–213.Google Scholar
  68. Sapsed, J., Grantham, A., & DeFillippi, R. (2007). A bridge over troubled waters: Bridging organisations and entrepreneurial opportunities in emerging sectors. Research Policy, 36(9), 1314–1334.Google Scholar
  69. Schwens, C., & Kabst, R. (2009). How early opposed to late internationalizers learn: Experience of others and paradigms of interpretation. International Business Review, 18(5), 509–522.Google Scholar
  70. Seringhaus, F. R., & Rosson, P. J. (1994). International trade fairs and foreign market involvement: Review and research directions. International Business Review, 3(3), 311–329.Google Scholar
  71. Smith, K. G., Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. (2005). Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48(2), 346–357.Google Scholar
  72. Sofka, W. (2008). Globalizing domestic absorptive capacities. Management International Review, 48(6), 769–792.Google Scholar
  73. Sofka, W., & Grimpe, C. (2010). Specialized search and innovation performance—Evidence across Europe. R&D Management, 40(3), 310–323.Google Scholar
  74. Sousa, C. M., Martínez‐López, F. J., & Coelho, F. (2008). The determinants of export performance: A review of the research in the literature between 1998 and 2005. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(4), 343–374.Google Scholar
  75. Spithoven, A., Clarysse, B., & Knockaert, M. (2011). Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries. Technovation, 31(1), 10–21.Google Scholar
  76. Stringfellow, A., Winter, N., & Bowen, D. (2004). CRM: Profiting from understanding customer needs. Business Horizons, 47(5), 45–52.Google Scholar
  77. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 27–43.Google Scholar
  78. Szyliowicz, D., & Galvin, T. (2010). Applying broader strokes: Extending institutional perspectives and agendas for international entrepreneurship research. International Business Review, 19(4), 317–332.Google Scholar
  79. Tether, B. S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why? An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31(6), 947–967.Google Scholar
  80. Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (2013). Managing innovation (5th ed.). Wiley: Hoboken.Google Scholar
  81. Todorova, G., & Durisin, B. (2007). Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 774–786.Google Scholar
  82. Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996–1004.Google Scholar
  83. Tzokas, N., Kim, Y. A., Akbar, H., & Al-Dajani, H. (2015). Absorptive capacity and performance: The role of customer relationship and technological capabilities in high-tech SMEs. Industrial Marketing Management, 47, 134–142.Google Scholar
  84. Un, C. A., Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Asakawa, K. (2010). R&D collaborations and product innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(5), 673–689.Google Scholar
  85. Villar, C., Alegre, J., & Pla-Barber, J. (2014). Exploring the role of knowledge management practices on exports: A dynamic capabilities view. International Business Review, 23(1), 38–44.Google Scholar
  86. Volberda, H. W., Foss, N. J., & Lyles, M. A. (2010). Perspective—Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize its potential in the organization field. Organization Science, 21(4), 931–951.Google Scholar
  87. von Hippel, E. (1998). Economics of product development by users: The impact of “sticky” local information. Management Science, 44(5), 629–644.Google Scholar
  88. Wang, Y., Cao, W., Zhou, Z., & Ning, L. (2013). Does external technology acquisition determine export performance? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. International Business Review, 22(6), 1079–1091.Google Scholar
  89. Wynarczyk, P. (2013). Open innovation in SMEs: A dynamic approach to modern entrepreneurship in the twenty-first century. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20(2), 258–278.Google Scholar
  90. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.Google Scholar
  91. Zhou, K. Z., & Wu, F. (2010). Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 547–561.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management ‘Juan José Renau Piqueras’Universitat de ValènciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations