Management International Review

, Volume 57, Issue 5, pp 749–774 | Cite as

Learning from Political Change and the Development of MNCs’ Political Capabilities: Evidence from the Global Mining Industry

  • Naoki YasudaEmail author
  • Hitoshi Mitsuhashi
Research Article


Previous studies have suggested that (1) a type of organizational capabilities—namely, political capabilities—are required for multinational corporations (MNCs) to grow in global markets, (2) political capabilities are important for building productive relations with governments in politically risky host countries, and (3) MNCs can develop political capabilities by accumulating foreign experiences. However, empirical studies have found both positive and negative effects of such experiences on global market expansions. This study attributes such mixed findings to our lack of understanding about MNCs’ procurement processes of political capabilities and proposes types of experiences critical for such procurements by focusing on their reactions to political changes in host countries. Using data on the global mining industry and political changes in host countries, we find that MNCs develop political capabilities and thus make entries into politically risky host countries when they accumulate the experience of partially divesting some of their assets after political changes in host countries. We also find that MNCs are less likely to enter such countries if they have more experiences of exiting from host countries following political change.


Political capabilities Political change Foreign direct investment Organizational experience Market entry Market exit 



This work was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI Grant Numbers 15H06667 and 16H03658.


  1. Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argote, L., Ingram, P., Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (2000). Knowledge transfer in organizations: Learning from the experience of others. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barkema, H. G., Shekar, O., Vermeulen, F., & Bell, J. H. J. (1997). Working abroad, working with others: How firms learn to operate international joint ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 40(2), 426–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baron, D. P. (1995). Integrated strategy. California Management Review, 37(2), 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baum, J. A. C., & Ingram, P. (1998). Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1980. Management Science, 44(7), 996–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Białkowski, J., Gottschalk, K., & Wisniewski, T. P. (2008). Stock market volatility around national elections. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(9), 1941–1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Björkman, I., Barner-Rasmussen, W., & Li, L. (2004). Managing knowledge transfer in MNCs: The impact of headquarters control mechanisms. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 443–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boddewyn, J. J., & Brewer, T. L. (1994). International-business political behavior: New theoretical directions. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 119–143.Google Scholar
  10. Boutchkova, M., Doshi, H., Durnev, A., & Molchanov, A. (2012). Precarious politics and return volatility. Review of Financial Studies, 25(4), 1111–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buckley, P. J., Chen, L., Clegg, L. J., & Voss, H. (2016). Experience and FDI Risk-taking: A microfoundational reconceptualization. Journal of International Management, 22(2), 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chang, S. J. (1995). International expansion strategy of Japanese firms: Capability building through sequential entry. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 383–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chittoor, R., Ray, S., Aulakh, P. S., & Sarkar, M. B. (2008). Strategic responses to institutional changes: ‘Indigenous growth’ model of the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Journal of International Management, 14(3), 252–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Click, R. W., & Weiner, R. J. (2010). Resource nationalism meets the market: Political risk and the value of petroleum reserves. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(5), 783–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. (2001). Survival and profitability: The roles of experience and intangible assets in foreign subsidiary performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 1028–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Delios, A., & Henisz, W. J. (2000). Japanese firms’ investment strategies in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Delios, A., & Henisz, W. J. (2003a). Policy uncertainty and the sequence of entry by Japanese firms, 1980–1998. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(3), 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Delios, A., & Henisz, W. J. (2003b). Political hazards, experience, and sequential entry strategies: The international expansion of Japanese firms, 1980–1998. Strategic Management Journal, 24(11), 1153–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dieleman, M., & Boddewyn, J. J. (2012). Using organization structure to buffer political ties in emerging markets: A case study. Organization Studies, 33(1), 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Doh, J. P., Lawton, T. C., & Rajwani, T. (2012). Advancing nonmarket strategy research: Institutional perspectives in a changing world. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(3), 22–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dunning, J. H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ellis, K. M., Reus, T. H., Lamont, B. T., & Ranft, A. L. (2011). Transfer effects in large acquisitions: How size-specific experience matters. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1261–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, 96(1), 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fagre, N., & Wells, L. T. (1982). Bargaining power of multinationals and host governments. Journal of International Business Studies, 13(1), 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Feinberg, S. E., & Gupta, A. K. (2009). MNC subsidiaries and country risk: Internalization as a safeguard against weak external institutions. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 381–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Foss, N. J., & Pedersen, T. (2002). Transferring knowledge in MNCs: The role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context. Journal of International Management, 8(1), 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Frynas, J. G., & Mellahi, K. (2003). Political risks as firm-specific (dis) advantages: Evidence on transnational oil firms in Nigeria. Thunderbird International Business Review, 45(5), 541–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Frynas, J. G., Mellahi, K., & Pigman, G. A. (2006). First mover advantages in international business and firm-specific political resources. Strategic Management Journal, 27(4), 321–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. García-Canal, E., & Guillén, M. F. (2008). Risk and the strategy of foreign location choice in regulated industries. Strategic Management Journal, 29(10), 1097–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ghoshal, S. (1987). Global strategy: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal, 8(5), 425–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ghoshal, S., Moran, P., & Almeida-Costa, L. (1995). The essence of the mega-corporation. Journal of International and Theoretical Economics, 151(4), 748–759.Google Scholar
  34. Goerzen, A., & Beamish, P. W. (2003). Geographic scope and multinational enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1289–1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 473–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hadani, M., & Schuler, D. A. (2013). In search of El Dorado: The elusive financial returns on corporate political investments. Strategic Management Journal, 34(2), 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Henisz, W. J. (2000). The institutional environment for economic growth. Economics and Politics, 12(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Henisz, W. J., & Delios, A. (2001). Uncertainty, imitation, and plant location: Japanese multinational corporations, 1990–1996. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 443–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Henisz, W. J., & Macher, J. T. (2004). Firm- and country-level trade-offs and contingencies in the evaluation of foreign investment: The semiconductor industry, 1994–2002. Organization Science, 15(5), 537–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Henisz, W. J., & Zelner, B. A. (2005). Legitimacy, interest group pressures, and change in emergent institutions: The case of foreign investors and host country governments. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hillman, A. J. (2005). Politicians on the board of directors: Do connections affect the bottom line? Journal of Management, 31(3), 464–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hillman, A. J., & Hitt, M. A. (1999). Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 825–842.Google Scholar
  44. Hillman, A. J., Zardkoohi, A., & Bierman, L. (1999). Corporate political strategies and firm performance: Indications of firm-specific benefits from personal service in the US government. Strategic Management Journal, 20(1), 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Holburn, G. L., & Bergh, R. G. V. (2008). Making friends in hostile environments: Political strategy in regulated industries. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 521–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Holburn, G. L. F., & Zelner, B. A. (2010). Political capabilities, policy risk, and international investment strategy: Evidence from the global electric power generation industry. Strategic Management Journal, 31(12), 1290–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jiménez, A. (2010). Does political risk affect the scope of the expansion abroad? Evidence from Spanish MNEs. International Business Review, 19(6), 619–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jiménez, A., & Delgado-García, J. B. (2012). Proactive management of political risk and corporate performance: The case of Spanish multinational enterprises. International Business Review, 21(6), 1029–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jiménez, A., Luis-Rico, I., & Benito-Osorio, D. (2014). The influence of political risk on the scope of internationalization of regulated companies: Insights from a Spanish sample. Journal of World Business, 49(3), 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Julio, B., & Yook, Y. (2012). Political uncertainty and corporate investment cycles. Journal of Finance, 67(1), 45–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Julio, B., & Yook, Y. (2016). Policy uncertainty, irreversibility, and cross-border flows of capital. Journal of International Economics, 103, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Keillor, B. D., Wilkinson, T. J., & Owens, D. (2005). Threats to international operations: Dealing with political risk at the firm level. Journal of Business Research, 58(5), 629–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kobrin, S. J. (1978). When does political instability result in increased investment risk? Columbia Journal of World Business, 13(3), 113–122.Google Scholar
  55. Kobrin, S. J. (1979). Political risk: A review and reconsideration. Journal of International Business Studies, 10(1), 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lawton, T., & Rajwani, T. (2011). Designing lobbying capabilities: Managerial choices in unpredictable environments. European Business Review, 23(2), 167–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lawton, T., McGuire, S., & Rajwani, T. (2013a). Corporate political activity: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 86–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lawton, T., Rajwani, T., & Doh, J. (2013b). The antecedents of political capabilities: A study of ownership, cross-border activity and organization at legacy airlines in a deregulatory context. International Business Review, 22(1), 228–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. (1988). First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lux, S., Crook, T. R., & Woehr, D. J. (2011). Mixing business with politics: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and outcomes of corporate political activity. Journal of Management, 37(1), 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Madsen, P. M., & Desai, V. (2010). Failing to learn? The effects of failure and success on organizational learning in the global orbital launch vehicle industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 451–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. McGuire, S., Lindeque, J., & Suder, G. (2012). Learning and lobbying: Emerging market firms and corporate political activity in Europe. European Journal of International Management, 6(3), 342–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mellahi, K., Frynas, J. G., Sun, P., & Siegel, D. (2016). A review of the nonmarket strategy literature: Toward a multi-theoretical integration. Journal of Management, 42(1), 143–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Metal Bulletin Monthly. (1998). South Africa’s long road to normality., 333, 12.Google Scholar
  68. Metal Bulletin Monthly. (2005). Rewards in Africa, despite risks. 410, 26–27.Google Scholar
  69. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  70. Oetzel, J. M., & Oh, C. H. (2014). Learning to carry the cat by the tail: Firm experience, disasters, and multinational subsidiary entry and expansion. Organization Science, 25(3), 732–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Oliver, C., & Holzinger, I. (2008). The effectiveness of strategic political management: A dynamic capabilities framework. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 496–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Perkins, S. E. (2014). When does prior experience pay? Institutional experience and the multinational corporation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(1), 145–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  75. Rajwani, T., & Liedong, T. A. (2015). Political activity and firm performance within nonmarket research: A review and international comparative assessment. Journal of World Business, 50(2), 273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rajwani, T., & Paroutis, S. (2013). Institutional conditions and political capabilities: An examination of airlines reactions to 9/11. Academy of Management Proceedings. doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2013.10958.Google Scholar
  77. Reeb, D., Sakakibara, M., & Mahmood, I. P. (2012). From the editors: Endogeneity in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(3), 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rui, H., Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Un, C. A. (2016). Learning-by-doing in emerging market multinationals: Integration, trial and error, repetition, and extension. Journal of World Business, 51(5), 686–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Siegel, J. (2007). Contingent political capital and international alliances: Evidence from South Korea. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(4), 621–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sun, P., Mellahi, K., & Thun, E. (2010). The dynamic value of MNE political embeddedness: The case of the Chinese automobile industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7), 1161–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vaaler, P. M. (2008). How do MNCs vote in developing country elections? Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Weidenbaum, M. (1980). Public policy: No longer a spectator sport for business. Journal of Business Strategy, 3(4), 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Xia, J. (2011). Mutual dependence, partner substitutability, and repeated partnership: The survival of cross-border alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 32(3), 229–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (2000). International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 925–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rikkyo UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Keio UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations