Advertisement

Management International Review

, Volume 56, Issue 2, pp 255–281 | Cite as

Collectivist Values, Exchange Ideology and Psychological Contract Preference

  • David C. ThomasEmail author
  • Elizabeth C. Ravlin
  • Yuan Liao
  • Daniel L. Morrell
  • Kevin Au
Research Article

Abstract

The psychological contract describes a set of individual perceptions concerning the terms of the exchange relationship between individuals and their organizations. While this concept has substantially advanced our knowledge about how individuals relate to their organization, as organizations globalize and workforce diversity increases, it is important to understand how individuals with different cultural value orientations think about these relationships. Our purpose in this study was to isolate, insofar as possible, the effects of the individual level value of cultural collectivism. In this paper, we present evidence from two studies that examine the relationship between the cultural value of collectivism and the preferences that individuals have for firms exhibiting different psychological contract forms. First, we demonstrate experimentally that collectivist orientation has an impact on fundamental beliefs about the nature of exchange. Then, in the second study, we show that collectivist value orientation had its effect on preferences for the psychological contract through beliefs about social exchange. In so doing, we go beyond the simple demonstration of the effects of cultural values to describe the causal chain through which these values operate. Our results suggest that effective management in multicultural organizations ultimately requires a clear understanding of the process whereby values influence beliefs about employment relationships, which has implications for both theory and practice.

Keywords

Collectivism Psychological contract Exchange ideology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper was supported by a grant to the first author from the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada, and by a grant to the second author from the Center for International Business Education and Research.

References

  1. Argyris, C. (1960). Understanding organizational behavior. Homewood: The Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ashworth, M. J. (2006). Preserving knowledge legacies: workforce aging, turnover, and human resources issues in the US electric power industry. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(9), 1659–1688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ballinger, G., & Rockmann, K. (2010). Chutes versus ladders: anchoring events and a punctuated equilibrium perspective on social exchange relationships. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 373–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Bond, M. H. (Ed.). (1986). The psychology of the Chinese people. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bontempo, R., & Rivero, J. C. (1992). Cultural variation in cognition: the role of self-concept in the attitude behavior link. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Las Vegas.Google Scholar
  7. Boyacigiller, N. A., & Adler, N. J. (1991). The parochial dinosaur: organizational science in a global context. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 262–290.Google Scholar
  8. Brislin, R. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brockner, J., Chen, Y. R., Mannix, E. A., Leung, K., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2000). Cultural and procedural fairness: when the effects of what you do depend on how you do it. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 138–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, A. D. (1997). Narcissism, identity and legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 22(3), 643–686.Google Scholar
  11. Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M., & Neuman, J. H. (2004). The psychological contract and individual differences: the role of exchange and creditor ideologies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 150–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeVos, A., De Stobbeleir, K., & Meganck, A. (2009). The relationship between career-related antecedents and graduates’ anticipatory psychological contracts. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(3), 289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715–1759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eisenberger, R., Cotterell, N., & Marvel, J. (1987). Reciprocation ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(4), 743–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vanderberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Enzle, M. E., & Schopflocher, D. (1978). Instigation of attribution processes by attributional questions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(4), 595–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Erez, M., & Earley, P. C. (1993). Culture, self-identity and work. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feldman, D. C., & Arnold, H. J. (1978). Position choice: comparing the importance of organizational and job factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(6), 706–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fiske, A. P. (1991). Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. Fiske, S., & Taylor, S. (1984). Social cognition. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  21. Foa, U., & Foa, E. (1974). Society structures of the mind. Springfield: Thomas.Google Scholar
  22. Goodwin, R., & Tsang, D. (1991). Preference for friends and close relationship partners: a cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Social Psychology, 131(4), 579–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greenberg, M. S., & Westcott, D. R. (1983). Indebtedness as a mediator of reactions to aid. In J. D. Fisher, A. Nadler, & B. M. DePaulo (Eds.), New directions in helping (pp. 85–112). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41(3), 924–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: accessibility, applicability and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. E. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Hong, Y-y, Morris, M. W., Chiu, C-y, & Benet-Martínez, V. (2000). Multicultural minds: a dynamic constructivist approach to culture. American Psychologist, 55(7), 709–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Horwitz, F. M., Chan, T. H., & Quazi, H. A. (2003). Finders, keepers? Attracting, motivating, and retaining knowledge workers. Human Resource Management Journal, 13(4), 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hui, C., Lee, C., & Rousseau, D. M. (2004). Psychological contract and organizational behavior in China: investigating generalizability and instrumentality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 311–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kickul, J., & Lester, S. W. (2001). Broken promises: equity sensitivity as a moderator between psychological contract breach and employee attitudes and behaviour. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16(2), 191–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kickul, J., Lester, S. W., & Belgio, E. (2004). Attitudinal and behavioral outcomes of psychological contract breach: a cross-cultural comparison of the United States and Hong Kong. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 4(2), 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kim, K. I., Park, H. J., & Suzuki, N. (1990). Reward allocations in the United States, Japan, and Korea: a comparison of individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 188–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. King, W. C., & Miles, E. W. (1994). The measurement of equity sensitivity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67(2), 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leung, K., & Bond, M. (1984). The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(4), 793–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Levinson, H., Price, C. R., Munden, K. J., Mandl, H. J., & Solley, C. M. (1963). Men, management and mental health. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Lincoln, J. R., & Kalleberg, A. L. (1985). Work organization and workforce commitment: a study of plants and employees in the U.S. and Japan. American Sociological Review, 50(6), 738–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lo, S., & Ayree, S. (2003). Psychological contract breach in a Chinese context: an integrative approach. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4), 1005–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Locke, E. A. (1986). Generalizing from laboratory to field: ecological validity or abstraction of essential elements? In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Generalizing from laboratory to field settings (pp. 3–9). Lexington: D.C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar
  40. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McLean Parks, J., & Schmedemann, D. A. (1994). When promises become contracts: implied contract and handbook provisions on job security. Human Resource Management, 33(3), 403–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miller, J. G., Bersoff, D. M., & Harwood, R. L. (1990). Perceptions of social responsibilities in India and the United States: moral imperatives or personal decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1), 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Montes, S. D., & Zweig, D. (2009). Do promises matter? An exploration of the role of promises in psychological contract breach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1243–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W.-S. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 311–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Parzefall, M.-R. (2008). Psychological contracts and reciprocity: a study in a Finnish context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(9), 1703–1719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Putnam, R. D. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: diversity and community in the twenty-first century: the 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ravlin, E. C., Liao, Y., Morrell, D., Au, K., & Thomas, D. C. (2012). Collectivist orientation and the psychological contract: mediating effects of creditor ideology. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(8), 772–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ravlin, E. C., & Meglino, B. M. (1987). Effect of values on perception and decision making: a study of alternative work values measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(4), 666–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Restubog, S. L. D., Bordia, P., & Tang, R. L. (2007). Behavioural outcomes of psychological contract breach in a non-Western culture: the moderating effect of equity sensitivity. British Journal of Management, 18(4), 376–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 574–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2), 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  56. Rousseau, D. M., & Schalk, R. (Eds.). (2000). Psychological contracts in employment: Cross-national perspectives. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Sanchez-Burks, J., Nisbett, R. E., & Ybarra, O. (2000). Cultural styles, relational schemas and prejudice against outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(2), 174–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schein, E. H. (1965). Organizational psychology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  59. Schneider, B., Goldstein, H. W., & Smith, D. B. (1995). The ASA framework: an update. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 747–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shore, B. (1996). Culture in mind: Cognition, culture and the problem of meaning. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Shore, L. M., & Barksdale, K. (1998). Examining degree of balance and level of obligation in the employment relationship: a social exchange approach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(s1), 731–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P. S., & Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism: a theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29(3), 240–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Song, L. J., Tsui, A. S., & Law, K. S. (2009). Unpacking employee responses to organizational exchange mechanisms: the role of social and economic exchange perceptions. Journal of Management, 35(1), 56–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: why experiments are often more effective than meditational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stone-Romero, E. F., & Rosopa, P. J. (2008). The relative validity of inferences about mediation as a function of research design characteristics. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 326–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.Google Scholar
  67. Thomas, D. C., & Au, K. Y. (2002). The effect of cultural differences on behavioral responses to low job satisfaction. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Thomas, D. C., Au, K. Y., & Ravlin, E. C. (2003). Cultural variation and the psychological contract. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(5), 451–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Thomas, D. C., Fitzsimmons, S. R., Ravlin, E. C., Au, K. Y., Ekelund, B. Z., & Barzanty, C. (2010). Psychological contracts across cultures. Organization Studies, 31(11), 1437–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Thompson, M., & Heron, P. (2005). The difference a manager can make: organizational justice and knowledge worker commitment. International Journal of Human Resources Management, 16(3), 383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ting-Toomey, S. (1994). Managing conflict in intimate intercultural relationships. In D. D. Cahn (Ed.), Conflict in personal relationships (pp. 47–77). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  72. Trafimow, D., Triandis, H., & Goto, S. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(5), 649–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Triandis, H. C. (1988). Collectivism vs. individualism: a reconceptualization of a basic concept in cross-cultural social psychology. In G. K. Verma & C. Bagley (Eds.), Cross-cultural studies of personality, attitudes and cognition (pp. 60–95). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  75. Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Triandis, H. C., & Suh, E. M. (2002). Cultural influences on personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 133–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tse, D. K., Lee, K., Vertinsky, I., & Wehrung, D. A. (1988). Does culture matter? A cross-cultural study of executive’s choice, decisiveness, and risk adjustment in international marketing. Journal of Marketing, 52(4), 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vroom, V. H. (1966). Organizational choice: a study of pre- and postdecision processes. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1(2), 212–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wanous, J. P. (1989). Installing a realistic job preview: ten tough choices. Personnel Psychology, 42(1), 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Westwood, R., Sparrow, P., & Leung, A. (2001). Challenges to the psychological contract in Hong Kong. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(4), 621–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yang, K. S. (1993). Chinese social orientation: an integrative analysis. In L. Y. Cheng, F. M. C. Cheung, & C. N. Chen (Eds.), Psychotherapy for the Chinese: Selected papers from the first international conference (pp. 19–56). Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  82. Zagenczyk, T.J., Restubog, S.L.D., Kiewitz, C., Kiazad, K, & Tang, R.L. (2014). Psychological contracts as a mediator between Machiavellianism and employee citizenship and deviant behaviors. Journal of Management 40(4), 1098–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zapata-Phelan, C. P., Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & Livingston, B. (2009). Procedural justice, interactional justice, and task performance: the mediating role of intrinsic motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zhao, H., Wayne, S. J., Glibkowski, B. C., & Bravo, J. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 647–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • David C. Thomas
    • 1
    Email author
  • Elizabeth C. Ravlin
    • 2
  • Yuan Liao
    • 3
  • Daniel L. Morrell
    • 4
  • Kevin Au
    • 5
  1. 1.Segal Graduate School of ManagementSimon Fraser UniversityVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Department of Management, Moore School of BusinessUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Managing People in OrganizationsIESE Business SchoolBarcelonaSpain
  4. 4.Department of Management and MarketingMiddle Tennessee State UniversityMurfreesboroUSA
  5. 5.Department of ManagementThe Chinese University of Hong KongHong Kong SARChina

Personalised recommendations