Advertisement

Management International Review

, Volume 55, Issue 2, pp 235–253 | Cite as

International Diversification of Emerging Market Firms: The Role of Ownership Structure and Group Affiliation

  • Ajai GaurEmail author
  • Andrew Delios
Research Article

Abstract

We examine the role of ownership structure on international diversification during institutional transition. We also examine how domestic and foreign ownership, as well as business group affiliation, moderate the performance consequences of international diversification. Our theoretical framework integrates agency and institutional perspectives with internationalization research. We argue that the ownership concentration, along with the identity of owners, will influence firm internationalization. Our results, based on a longitudinal sample of more than 5,000 publicly listed Indian firms during 1990–2005, demonstrate that greater domestic or foreign ownership is associated with a higher level of international diversification by emerging economy firms. Furthermore, a negative relationship emerges between international diversification and firm performance, moderated by the ownership concentration of domestic owners and group affiliation.

Keywords

International diversification Ownership structure Group affiliation Firm performance India 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from Rutgers University Research Council. The article benefited greatly from comments and advice provided by the special issue editors and two anonymous reviewers.

References

  1. Aguiar, M., Bhattacharya, A., Bradtke, T., Cotte, P., Dertnig, S., Meyer, M., Michael, D. C. & Sirkin, H. L. (2006). The new global challengers: how top 100 companies from rapidly developing economies are changing the world. Boston Consulting Group report.Google Scholar
  2. Almeida, E. D., Lu, X., Rangnekar, A., & Schizer, D. (2010). Foreword. In K. P. Sauvant et al. (Eds.), Foreign direct investment from emerging markets: the challenges ahead. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Anand, J., & Delios, A. (1996). Competing globally: how Japanese MNCs have matched goals and strategies in India and China. Columbia Journal of World Business, 31(3), 60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barber, B. M., & Lyon, J. D. (1996). Detecting abnormal operating performance: the empirical power and specification of test statistics. Journal of Financial Economics, 41(3), 359–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertrand, M., Mehta, P., & Mullainathan, S. (2002). Ferreting out tunneling: an application to Indian business groups. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 121–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhaumik, S., Driffield, N., & Pal, S. (2010). Does ownership concentration affect MNE operations? the case of Indian automobiles and pharmaceuticals. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3), 437–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buckley, P. J. (2002). Is the international business research agenda running out of steam? Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 365–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carpenter, M. A., Sanders, W. G., & Gregersen, H. B. (2001). Bundling human capital with organizational context: the impact of international experience on multinational firm performance and CEO pay. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chacar, A., & Vissa, B. (2005). Are emerging economies less efficient? performance persistence and business group affiliation. Strategic Management Journal, 26(10), 933–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chhibber, P. K., & Majumdar, S. K. (2005). Property rights and the control of strategy: foreign ownership rules and domestic firm globalization in Indian industry. Law and Policy, 27(1), 52–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Contractor, F., Kumar, V., & Kundu, S. (2007). The nature of the relationship between international expansion and performance: the case of emerging market firms. Journal of World Business, 42(4), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Contractor, F. J., Kundu, S. K., & Hsu, C. C. (2003). A three-stage theory of international expansion: the link between multinationality and performance in the service sector. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1), 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Genc, M. (2008). Transforming disadvantages into advantages: developing-country MNEs in the least developed countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6), 957–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. (1999). Geographic scope, product diversification and the corporate performance of Japanese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 20(8), 711–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Delios, A., Gaur, A. S., & Kamal, S. (2009). International acquisitions and the globalization of firms from India. In J. Chaisse & P. Gugler (Eds.), Expansion of tade and FDI in Asia: strategic and policy challenges. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Delios, A., & Henisz, W. J. (2000). Japanese firms’ investment strategies in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dharwadkar, R., George, G., & Brandes, P. (2000). Privatization in emerging economies: an agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 650–669.Google Scholar
  18. Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2008). Institutions and the OLI paradigm of the multinational enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(4), 573–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gaur, A. S., & Delios, A. (2006). Business group affiliation and firm performance during institutional transition. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 2006. Google Scholar
  20. Gaur, A. S., & Kumar, V. (2009). International diversification, firm performance and business group affiliation: empirical evidence from India. British Journal of Management, 20(2), 172–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaur, A. S., & Kumar, V. (2010). Internationalization of emerging market firms: a case for theoretical extension. In T. M. Devinney et al. (Eds.), Advances in international management: the past, present and future of international business and management (Vol. 23). New York: Emerald.Google Scholar
  22. Gaur, A. S., Kumar, V., & Sarathy, R. (2011). Liability of foreignness and internationalization of emerging market firms. In C. Asmussen et al. (Eds.), Advances in international management: dynamics of globalization: location-specific advantages or liabilities of foreignness? (Vol. 24, pp. 211–233). New York: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gaur, A. S., Kumar, V., & Singh, D. A. (2014). Resources, institutions and internationalization process of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business, 49(1), 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gaur, A. S., & Lu, J. W. (2007). Ownership strategies and subsidiary performance: impacts of institutional distance and experience. Journal of Management, 33(1), 84–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. George, G., Wiklund, J., & Zahra, S. A. (2005). Ownership and the internationalization of small firms. Journal of Management, 31(2), 210–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Granovetter, M. (1994). Business groups. In J. N. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 453–475). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Guillen, M. (2000). Business groups in emerging economies: a resource based view. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 362–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guillen, M. F., & Garcia-Canal, E. (2009). The American model of the multinational firm and the “new” multinationals from emerging economies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(2), 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: effects on innovation and firm performance in product diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 767–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoskisson, R. E., & Hitt, M. A. (1990). Antecedents and performance outcomes of diversification: a review and critique of theoretical perspectives. Journal of Management, 16(2), 461–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Johnson, R. A., & Grossman, W. (2002). Conflicting voices: the effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 697–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hsiao, C. (1995). Panel analysis for metric data. In G. Arminger et al. (Eds.), Handbook of statistical modeling for social and behavior science. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hymer, S. H. (1976). A study of direct foreign investment. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kedia, B. L., Mukherjee, D., & Lahiri, S. (2006). Indian business groups: evolution and transformation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4), 559–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (2000a). Is group membership profitable in emerging markets? an analysis of diversified Indian business groups. Journal of Finance, 55(2), 867–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (2000b). The future of business groups in emerging markets: long-run evidence from Chile. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 268–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Khanna, T., & Rivkin, J. (2001). Estimating the performance effects of networks in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal, 22(1), 45–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kumar, V., Gaur, A. S., & Pattnaik, C. (2012). Product diversification and international expansion of business groups: evidence from India. Management International Review, 52(2), 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. (2001). The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), 565–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. (2004). International diversification and firm performance: the s-curve hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 598–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Luo, Y., & Tung, R. (2007). International expansion of emerging market enterprises: a springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 481–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mathews, J. A. (2006). Dragon multinationals: new players in 21st century of globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(1), 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1990). Do managerial objectives drive bad acquisitions? Journal of Finance, 45(1), 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (1991). Why investors value multinationality. Journal of Business, 64(2), 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nachum, L. (2004). Geographic and industrial diversification of developing country firms. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peng, M., & Delios, A. (2006). What determines the scope of the firm over time and around the world? an Asia Pacific perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(4), 385–406.Google Scholar
  50. Ramamurti, R., & Singh, J. (2009). Indian multinationals: generic internationalization strategies. In R. Ramamurti & J. Singh (Eds.), Emerging multinationals from emerging markets (pp. 1–66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ramaswamy, K., Li, M. F., & Veliyath, R. (2002). Variations in ownership behavior and propensity to diversify: a study of the Indian corporate context. Strategic Management Journal, 23(4), 345–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sanders, W. M. G., & Carpenter, M. A. (1998). Internationalization and firm governance: the roles of CEO compensation, top team composition and board structure. Academy of Management Journal, 41(2), 158–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Singh, D. A., & Gaur, A. S. (2009). Business group affiliation, firm governance and firm performance: evidence from China and India. Corporate Governance, 17(4), 411–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Singh, D. A., & Gaur, A. S. (2013). Governance structure, innovation and internationalization: evidence from India. Journal of International Management, 19(3), 300–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sullivan, D. (1994). Measuring the degree of internationalization of a firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2), 325–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tallman, S., & Li, J. T. (1996). Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thomsen, S., & Pedersen, T. (2000). Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European companies. Strategic Management Journal, 21(6), 689–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tihanyi, L., Johnson, R. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Hitt, M. A. (2003). Institutional ownership differences and international diversification: the effects of boards of directors and technological opportunity. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. (2005). Strategy research in emerging economies: challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zahra, S. A. (2003). International expansion of U.S. manufacturing family business: the effect of ownership and involvement. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 495–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (2000). International expansion by new venture firms: international diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 925–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhang, H., Y., & Bulcke, D. (1996). China: rapid changes in the investment development path. In J. Dunning & R. Narula (Eds.), Foreign direct investment and governments: catalysts for economic restructuring (pp. 380–422). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management and Global BusinessRutgers Business SchoolNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Business PolicyNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations