Advertisement

Management International Review

, Volume 54, Issue 6, pp 879–906 | Cite as

Clusters and Regional Management Structures by Western MNCs in Asia: Overcoming the Distance Challenge

  • Bruno Amann
  • Jacques Jaussaud
  • Johannes SchaaperEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Recent literature suggests that multinational companies pursue regional rather than global strategies. Therefore, this study investigates regional management structures, using French multinational companies (MNCs) in the Asia–Pacific region as an empirical context, to address two research questions: first, do MNCs split Asia into subregions and, if so, what are the resulting clusters of countries and clustering criteria? Second, what kind of regional management structures do MNCs establish in Asia, and what are their roles and functions? Factors, such as MNC size, the size of host markets, or the nature of their activities, might explain some differences. The authors conducted 77 face-to-face interviews with expatriated managers in charge of the subsidiaries or regional management structures of 47 French MNCs located in 11 countries in Asia, then crossed these data with secondary sources of information. Nearly half the MNCs subdivide the Asia–Pacific region into clusters of countries, where they locate regional management centres (regional headquarters, regional offices, distribution centres, local offices) with substantial functions and roles. The main drivers of a regional Asian strategy and organisation are the overall size of the MNC and its sales in Asia; the presence of manufacturing activities does not exert any influence. This research identifies ten clusters of countries in Asia, determined by the French MNCs in our sample, on the basis of four main criteria: market orientation/economic logic, geographical and institutional proximity, cultural differences, and the MNC’s own characteristics. Smaller MNCs do not slice Asia into clusters but rather centralise regional decisions and control procedures, implementing few regional management centres in Asia and giving them limited roles and functions.

Keywords

Multinational companies Clusters Regional management centres Subsidiaries Regional organisation Autonomy Control Asia 

References

  1. Alfoldi, E., Clegg, J., & McGaughey, S. (2012). Coordination at the edge of the empire: the delegation of headquarters functions through regional management mandates. Journal of International Management, 18(3), 276–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambos, B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2010). Headquarters’ attention and its effect on subsidiary performance. Management International Review, 50(4), 449–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambos, B., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (2010). The new role of regional management. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Daniels, J. D. (1987). Bridging national and global marketing strategies through regional operations. International Marketing Review, 4(3), 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De la Torre, J., Esperança, J. P., & Martínez, J. I. (2011). Organizational responses to regional integration among MNEs in Latin America. Management International Review, 51(2), 241–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. (2005). Regional and global strategies of Japanese firms. Management International Review, 45(1), 19–36.Google Scholar
  7. Egelhoff, W. G. (1982). Strategy and structure in multinational corporations: an information processing approach. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(3), 435–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Egelhoff, W. G. (1988). Strategy and structure in multinational corporations: a revision of the Stopford and Wells model. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Enright, M. J. (2005a). Regional management centers in the Asia-Pacific. Management International Review, 45(1), 69–82.Google Scholar
  10. Enright, M. J. (2005b). The role of regional management centers. Management International Review, 45(1), 83–102.Google Scholar
  11. Flores, R., Aguilera, R., Mahdian, A., & Vaaler, P. (2013). How well do supranational regional grouping schemes fit international business research models? Journal of International Business Studies, 44(5), 451–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freiling, J., & Laudien, S. (2012). Regional headquarters capabilities as key facilitator of the coordination of transnational business activities. ZenTra Working Paper in Transnational Studies, No. 2/2012.Google Scholar
  13. Ghemawat, P. (2005). Regional strategies for global leadership. Harvard Business Review, 83(12), 98–108.Google Scholar
  14. Hoenen, A., Nell, P., & Ambos, B. (2013). MNE entrepreneurial capabilities at intermediate levels: the roles of external embeddedness and heterogeneous environments. Long Range Planning. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.009. Accessed 1 Oct 2013.
  15. Jaussaud, J., & Schaaper, J. (2007). European and Japanese multinational companies in China: organization and control of subsidiaries. Asian Business & Management, 6(3), 223–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kidd, J. B., & Teramoto, Y. (1995). The learning organization: the case of the Japanese RHQs in Europe. Management International Review, 35(2), 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kolk, A., & Van Tulder, R. J. M. (2005). Setting new global rules? TNCs and codes of conduct. Transnational Corporations, 14(3), 1–27.Google Scholar
  18. Kuzel, A. (1992). Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 31–44). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Lasserre, P. (1995). Corporate strategies for the Asia-Pacific region. Long Range Planning, 28(1), 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lasserre, P. (1996). RHQ: the spearhead for Asia Pacific markets. Long Range Planning, 29(1), 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lehrer, M., & Asakawa, K. (1999). Unbundling European operations: regional management and corporate flexibility in American and Japanese MNCs. Journal of World Business, 34(3), 267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Levy, D. L., & Newell, P. (2006). Multinationals in global governance. In S. Vachani (Ed.), Transformations in global governance; implications for multinationals and other stakeholders (pp. 146–167). Cheltenham: Edward Elgard Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Li, G. H., Yu, C. M., & Seetoo, D. H. (2010). Toward a theory of regional organisation: the emerging role of subregional headquarters and the impact on subsidiaries. Management International Review, 50(1), 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mahnke, V., Ambos, B., Nell, P. C., & Hobdari, B. (2012). How do regional headquarters influence corporate decisions in networked MNCs? Journal of International Management, 18(3), 293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Mori, T. (2002). The role and function of European regional headquarters in Japanese MNCs. Working paper No. 141, Hirosaki University.Google Scholar
  27. Nell, P. C., Ambos, B., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (2011). The benefits of hierarchy: exploring the effects of regional headquarters in multinational corporations. In C. G. Rasmussen (Ed.), Advances in international management (Vol. 24, pp. 85–106). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  28. Ohmae, K. (1985). Triad power, the coming shape of global competition. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  29. Osegowitsch, T., & Sammartino, A. (2008). Reassessing (home-) regionalisation. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(2), 184–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Paik, Y., & Sohn, J. H. D. (2004). Striking a balance between global integration and local responsiveness: the case of Toshiba corporation in redefining RHQ’s role. Organisational Analysis, 12(4), 347–359.Google Scholar
  31. Picard, J., Boddenwyn, J. J., & Grosse, R. (1998). Centralisation and autonomy in international-marketing decision making: a longitudinal study. Journal of Global Marketing, 12(2), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Piekkari, R., Nell, P. C., & Ghauri, P. N. (2010). Regional management as a system: a longitudinal case study. Management International Review, 50(4), 513–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Poon, J. P. H., & Thompson, E. R. (2003). Developmental and quiescent subsidiaries in the Asia-Pacific: evidence from Hong Kong, Singapore, Shanghai and Sydney. Economic Geography, 79(2), 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Prahalad, C. K., & Doz, Y. L. (1987). The multinational missions: balancing local demands and global vision. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2008). A new perspective on the regional and global strategies of multinational services firms. Management International Review, 48(4), 397–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schütte, H. (1997). Strategy and organisation: challenges for European MNCs in Asia. European Management Journal, 15(4), 436–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Silverman, D. (2005). Doing qualitative research; a practical handbook. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Symon, G., & Cassel, C. (1998). Qualitative methods and analysis in organisational research. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Symon, G., & Cassel, C. (2012). Qualitative organizational research: core methods and current challenges. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Yeung, H. W., Poon, J., & Perry, M. (2001). Towards a regional strategy: the role of regional headquarters of foreign firms in Singapore. Urban Studies, 38(1), 157–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yin, R. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  42. Yin, M. S., & Walsh, J. (2011). Analyzing the factors contributing to the establishment of Thailand as a hub for regional operating headquarters. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 2(6), 275–287.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruno Amann
    • 1
  • Jacques Jaussaud
    • 2
  • Johannes Schaaper
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.LGCUniversity of ToulouseToulouseFrance
  2. 2.CREGUniversity of Pau et des Pays de l’Adour (UPPA)PauFrance
  3. 3.Kedge Business SchoolMarseilleFrance
  4. 4.CREGUniversity of Pau et des Pays de l’Adour (UPPA)TalenceFrance

Personalised recommendations