Management International Review

, Volume 53, Issue 1, pp 109–139 | Cite as

Clanism

Definition and Implications for Human Resource Management
Research Article
First Online:

Abstract

  • The objectives of this paper are: (1) to present and develop clanism as an indigenous management concept in Central Asia, and (2) to analyze the effect of clanism on a specific management function—human resource management (HRM)—in the concrete context of Kazakhstan.

  • This exploratory study employs a qualitative research. The data indicate that the degree to which clanism affects HRM practices depends, to a great extent, on the type of company. Clanism’s effect is strong in state-owned companies and moderate in privately held companies, while it is weak in the subsidiaries of multinational companies. Furthermore, the influx of western MNCs has influenced Kazakhstani HRM in general and lessened the influence of clanism on HRM. However, some characteristics of the local labor market may strengthen the effect of clanism on HRM practices.

  • The paper proposes a definition of clanism; discusses the reasons for clanism’s existence; investigates how clanism differs from other indigenous concepts, such as blat and guanxi; and analyzes how clanism affects HRM practices in Kazakhstan, a country that is strategically important for international management.

Keywords

Clanism Kazakhstan Human resource management Indigenous concept 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ardichvili, A. (2001). Leadership styles and work-related values of managers and employees of manufacturing enterprises in post-communist countries. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(4), 363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ardichvili, A., & Kuchinke, K. (2002). Leadership styles and cultural values among managers and subordinates: A comparative study of four countries of the former Soviet Union, Germany, and the US. Human Resource Development International, 5(1), 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjorkman, I., & Lu, Y. (1999). Guanxi networks and job mobility in China and Singapore. Social Forces, 75(3), 981–1005.Google Scholar
  4. Boisot, M., & Child, J. (1996). From fiefs to clans and network capitalism: Explaining China’s emerging economic order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 600–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cappelli, P., Singh, H., Singh, J., & Useem, M. (2010). The India way: Lessons for the U.S. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(2), 6–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coleman, J. S. (1994). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Collins, K. (2006). Clan politics and regime transition in Central Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Commercio, M. (2004). The ‘Pugachev rebellion’ in the context of post-Soviet Kazakh nationalization. Nationalities Papers, 32(1), 87–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, cannons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dempsey, K. (2005). A woman’s place is in the HR department. Personnel Today, 11(8), 10.Google Scholar
  11. Edgar, A. (2004). Tribal nation: The making of Soviet Turkmenistan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Festing, M., & Sahakiants, I. (2010). Compensation practices in Central and Eastern European EU member states: An analytical framework based on institutional perspectives, path dependencies and efficiency considerations. Thunderbird International Business Review, 52(3), 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fletcher, C., & Perry, E. (2001). Performance appraisal and feedback: A consideration of national culture and a review of contemporary research and future trends. In N. Anderson et al. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (pp. 127–144). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huff, A. (1999). Writing for scholarly publication. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Kleveman, L. (2003). The new great game: Blood and oil in Central Asia. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Ledeneva, A. (1998). Russia’s economy of favours: Blat, networking, and informal exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Martin, R. (2008). Post-socialist segmented capitalism: The case of Hungary. Developing business systems theory. Human Relations, 61(1), 131–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Masanov, N. (1996). Kazakhskaia politicheskaia I intellektual’naia elita: klanovaia prinadlezhnost’ i vnutriethnicheskoe sopernichestvo (Kazakhstani political and intellectual elite: Clan attachment and interethnic competition). Vestnik Evrazii, 1(2), 46–61.Google Scholar
  19. Meyer, K. E. (2006). Asian management research needs more self-confidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(2), 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Michailova, S., & Worm, V. (2003). Personal networking in Russia and China: Blat and guanxi. European Management Journal, 21(4), 509–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Minbaeva, D., & Muratbekova-Touron, M. (2011). Experience of Canadian and Chinese acquisitions in Kazakhstan. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(14), 2946–2964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Minbaeva, D., Hutchings, K., & Thomson, B. (2007). Hybrid human resource management in post-Soviet Kazakhstan. European Journal of International Management, 1(4), 350–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morley, M., Minbaeva, D., & Michailova, S. (2012). The transition states of Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. In C. Brewster & W. Mayrhofer (Eds.), Handbook of research in comparative human resource management (pp. 550–575). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Muratbekova-Touron, M. (2002). Working in Kazakhstan and Russia: Perception of French managers. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(2), 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mustafaev, N. (2010). Litso tribalisma (The face of tribalism). Pravila igry, http://www.zonakz.net/articles/28222? mode = reply. Accessed 1 June 2012.Google Scholar
  27. North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Papalexandris, N., & Panayotopoulou, L. (2004). Exploring the mutual interaction of societal culture and human resource management practices. Employee Relations, 26(5), 495–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Peng, M. (2006). Global strategy. Cincinnati: South-Western Thomson.Google Scholar
  30. Peng, M., Wang, D., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 920–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schatz, E. (2004). Modern clan politics: The power of “blood” in Kazakhstan and beyond. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  32. Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tatibekov, B., Adams, J., & Prochaska, N. (2004). Characteristics of the labour market and human resource management in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Advances in Competitiveness Research, 12(1), 44–56.Google Scholar
  34. Tsui, A. S. (2007). From homogenization to pluralism: International management research in the Academy and beyond. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1353–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Umbetalieva, T. B. (2001). Yavlenie traibalisma v kazakhstane (The phenomenon of tribalism in Kazakhstan). Kazakhstan-Spektr, 3 January, 35–46. http://www.centrasia.ru/newsA.php?st = 1041591120. Accessed 1 June 2012.Google Scholar
  36. Vo, A. N. (2009). Career development for host country nationals: A case of American and Japanese multinational companies in Vietnam. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(6), 1402–1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Whetten, D. (2009). An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Management & Organization Review, 5(1), 29–55.Google Scholar
  38. Xin, K. K., & Pearce, J. L. (1996). Guanxi as substitute for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1641–1658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhakupov, Z. (2009). Shala Kazakh: Proshloe, nastoyashee, budushee (Shala Kazakh: past, present, future). Almaty: Almaty.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Copenhagen Business SchoolCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.ESCP EuropeParisFrance

Personalised recommendations