The Impact of Turbulent Events on Knowledge Acquisition
- 423 Downloads
Since Korea suffered the economic crisis, the economic and entrepreneurial atmosphere has been significantly changed in the country. Given the dramatic environmental turbulence, this paper raises key questions: (1) What are critical factors affecting knowledge absorption from investing firms in cross-border acquisitions (CBAs) and (2) whether the main factors affecting knowledge acquisition in CBAs have evolved accordingly or not. In order to identify the different learning patterns in CBAs, we divide a sample into two groups (i.e., CBAs that were formed before the crisis and those that were formed afterwards).
Regression analyses show that the two most powerful explanatory variables for knowledge acquisition only in pre-crisis are prior-related knowledge and compatible organizational culture. In contrast, intent to learn and efficient internal communication play a pivotal role in acquiring foreign knowledge from multinational enterprises (MNEs) in the CBAs formed after the crisis. Integration into foreign network and participation of foreign expatriates are significant determinants irrespective of the prevailing environment conditions.
Although this paper contributes to the current literature on knowledge acquisition and CBAs, we also suggest that the relative importance of the determinants of knowledge acquisition in CBAs are also essential during the economic crisis in Western economies.
KeywordsKnowledge acquisition Absorptive capacity Cross-border acquisitions Asia crisis
This work was supported by Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Research Fund.
- Bailey, K. D. (1987).Methods of social research. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Daghfous, A. (2004). Absorptive capacity and the implementation of knowledge-intensive best practices. SAMAdvanced Management Journal, 69(2), 21–27.Google Scholar
- Datta, D. K., & Puia, G. (1995). Cross-border acquisitions: An examination of the influence of relatedness and cultural fit on shareholder value creation in U.S. acquiring firms.Management International Review, 35(4), 337–359.Google Scholar
- Hair, J. F. J., Babin, B., Money, A. H., & Samouel, P. (2003).Essentials of business research methods. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Inkpen, A. C. (1997). An examination of knowledge management in international joint ventures. In P. W. Beamish & J. P. Killing (Eds.),Cooperative strategies: North American perspective (pp. 337–369). San Francisco: New Lexington Press.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Knowledge Economy (MKE). (2008).Foreign Direct Investment. Seoul: MKE Press.Google Scholar
- Nitsch, D., Beamish, P. W., & Makino, S. (1996). Entry mode and performance of Japanese FDI in Western Europe.Management International Review, 36(1), 27–43.Google Scholar
- Oliver, C. (1990). Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions.Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 241–265.Google Scholar
- Park, B. I. (2009). Control mechanisms and knowledge acquisition in international joint ventures.International Business Journal, 20(3), 29–62.Google Scholar
- Park, B. I., & Glaister, K. W. (2009). Determinants of knowledge acquisition in Korean international joint ventures: A pre- and post-Asia crisis comparison.Journal of Korea Trade, 13(2), 51–74.Google Scholar
- Schoenberg, R. (2006). Measuring the performance of corporate acquisitions: An empirical comparison of alternative metrics.British Journal of Measurement, 17(4), 361–370.Google Scholar
- UNCTAD. (2001).World investment report: Promoting linkages. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
- UNCTAD. (2007).World investment report: Transitional corporations, extractive industries and development. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
- Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension.Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.Google Scholar