Advertisement

Management International Review

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 151–173 | Cite as

Edith Penrose’s Theory of the Growth of the Firm and the strategic management of multinational enterprises

  • Peter J. Buckley
  • Mark Casson
Article

Abstract and Key Results

  • This paper provides a formal model of Edith Penrose’s Theory of the Growth of the Firm which has important implications for the strategy of multinational enterprises.

  • The model provides an analysis of the trade-off between product diversification and foreign market penetration. It also can account for the speed of entry into foreign markets.

  • Formalizing Penrose’s Theory of the Growth of the Firm provides an account of internationalization incorporating geographical expansion patterns, sequential decision making and learning.

Key words

Internationalization Multinational Firms Global Strategic Management Edith Penrose Foreign Market Entry Product Diversification 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barney, J. B., Strategic Factor Markets, Management Science, 32,10, 1985, pp. 1231–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumol, W. J., Business Behavior, Value and Growth, New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich 1967.Google Scholar
  3. Best, M. H./ Humphries, J., Edith Penrose: A Feminist Economist?, Feminist Economics, 9,1, 2003, pp. 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buckley, P. J./ Casson, M., The Future of the Multinational Enterprise, London: Macmillan 1976.Google Scholar
  5. Buckley, P. J./ Casson, M., The Theory of the Growth of the Firm: Extending the Penrose Model, mimeo 2004.Google Scholar
  6. Caves, R. E./ Porter, M. E., From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Variations and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91,3, 1977, pp. 241–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coase, R. H., The Nature of the Firm, Economica, 4,4, 1937, pp. 387–405.Google Scholar
  8. Demsetz, H., Industrial Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy, Journal of Law and Economics, 16,1, 1973, pp. 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Demsetz, H., Efficiency, Competition and Policy, Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1982.Google Scholar
  10. Dunning, J. H., Trade, Location of Economic Activity and the Multinational Enterprise: The Search for an Eclectic Approach, in Ohlin, B. et al. (ededs.), The International Allocation of Economic Activity, London: Macmillan 1977.Google Scholar
  11. Dunning, J. H., The Contribution of Edith Penrose to International Business Scholarship, Management International Review, 43,1, 2003, pp 3–19.Google Scholar
  12. Foss, N. J., Resources, Firms and Strategies, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1997.Google Scholar
  13. Foss, N. J., Edith Penrose, Economics and Strategic Management, in Pitelis, C. N. (ed.), The Growth of the Firm: The Legacy of Edith Penrose, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.Google Scholar
  14. Johanson J./ Vahlne, J. E., The Internationalisation Process of the Firm: A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Market Commitments, Journal of International Business Studies, 8,1, 1977, pp. 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kor, Y. Y./ Mahoney, J. T., Edith Penrose’s (1959) Contributions to the Resource-based View of Strategic Management, Journal of Management Studies, 41,1, 2004, pp. 183–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lippman, S. A./ Rumelt, R. P., Uncertain Immutability: An Analysis of Inter-firm Differences in Efficiency under Competition, Bell Journal of Economics, 13,3, 1982, pp. 418–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lockett, A./ Thompson, S., Edith Penrose’s Contributions to the Resource-based View: An Alternative Perspective, Journal of Management Studies, 41,1, 2004, pp. 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marris, R. L., Economic Theory of Managerial Capitalism, London: Macmillan 1964.Google Scholar
  19. Penrose, E. T., The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford: Blackwell 1959.Google Scholar
  20. Penrose, E. T., The Growth of the Firm: A Case Study: The Hercules Powder Company, The Business History Review, 34,1, 1960, pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Penrose, P./ Pitelis, C. N., Edith Elura Tilton Penrose: Life Contribution and Influence, in Pitelis, C. N. (ed.), The Growth of the Firm: The Legacy of Edith Penrose, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.Google Scholar
  22. Peteraf, M. A., The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-based View, Strategic Management Journal, 14,3, 1993, pp. 179–91.Google Scholar
  23. Pitelis, C. N. (ed.), The Growth of the Firm: The Legacy of Edith Penrose, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.Google Scholar
  24. Pitelis, C. N., Edith Penrose and the Resource-based View of (International) Business Strategy, International Business Review, 13,4, 2002, pp. 523–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rugman, A. M./ Verbeke, A., Edith Penrose’s Contribution to the Resource-based View of Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal, 23,7, 2002, pp. 769–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rugman, A. M./ Verbeke, A., A Final Word on Edith Penrose, Journal of Management Studies, 41,1, 2004, pp. 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schumpeter, J. A., The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1934.Google Scholar
  28. Teece, D. J., Economics of Scope and the Scope of the Enterprise, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1,3, 1980, pp. 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vernon, R., International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80,2, 1966, pp. 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Gabler Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter J. Buckley
    • 1
  • Mark Casson
    • 2
  1. 1.University of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.Centre for Institutional PerformanceUniversity of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations