Advertisement

Journal of Business Economics

, Volume 89, Issue 8–9, pp 1191–1214 | Cite as

Digitalization, innovative work behavior and extended availability

  • Elisabeth NöhammerEmail author
  • Stefan Stichlberger
Original Paper
  • 167 Downloads

Abstract

Digitalization has tremendous positive, but also negative potential for the organization and individual employees. The basic question therefore is how to design a digitalized environment that fosters idea generation and development and ensures good working practices of employees. In order to understand the requirements for the latter, the current implications of digitalization on employees have to be understood. This is of specific importance for expert organizations as these are dependent on product and service innovation as competitive advantage. In this paper, we focus on the antecedents of a very specific outcome of digitalization related to employee behavior with postulated influence on innovative capacity: extended availability and subsequent insufficient detachment with its potential consequences. Since the drivers and the extent of extended availability for work have not been sufficiently researched so far, the basis for developing solutions is incomplete. In this paper, we therefore investigate the working habits and reasons related to extended work related availability. Based on a quantitative investigation in three steps and using structural equation modelling, we show the interaction between the drivers of extended availability and the resulting additional time spent for working in expert organizations. By doing so, our research contributes to the discussion of optimizing the degree of digitalization employed or promoted in organization and establishes the link between the digitalized work setting, observed behavior, and its reasons.

Keywords

Digitalization Innovative work behavior Extended availability Employees Drivers Detachment 

JEL Classification

I230 J810 M540 O310 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Authors wish to thank Dr. Werner Hackl for his contributions to parts of the research project. This research was funded by Tiroler Wissenschaftsfonds (UNI-0404/1704).

References

  1. Adler M, Koch AK (2017) Expanding the job demands-resources model to classify innovation-predicting working conditions. manag rev 28:175–203Google Scholar
  2. Akhavan P, Hosseini SM, Abbasi M, Manteghi M (2015) Knowledge-sharing determinants, behaviors, and innovative work behaviors: an integrated theoretical view and empirical examination. Aslib J Inform Manag 67:562–591Google Scholar
  3. Alvehus J (2018) Conflicting logics? The role of HRM in a professional service firm. Hum Resour Manag J 28:31–44Google Scholar
  4. Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Res Organ Behav 10:123–167Google Scholar
  5. Amabile TM, Conti R, Coon H, Lazenby J, Herron M (1996) Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad Manag J 39:1154–1184.  https://doi.org/10.5465/256995 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Antoncic B, Hisrich RD (2001) Intrapreneurship: construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. J Bus Ventur 16:495–527Google Scholar
  7. Argyris C (1995) Action science and organizational learning. J Manag Psychol 10:20–26Google Scholar
  8. Ashforth BE, Kreiner GE, Fugate M (2000) All in a day’s work: boundaries and micro role transitions. Acad Manag Rev 25:472–491Google Scholar
  9. Bakker AB, Demerouti E (2007) The job demands-resources model: state of the art. J Manag Psychol 22:309–328Google Scholar
  10. Bamberg E, Dettmers J, Funck H, Krähe B, Vahle-Hinz T (2012) Effects of on-call work on well-being: results of a daily survey. Appl Psychol Health Well Being 4:299–320Google Scholar
  11. Barber LK, Santuzzi AM (2015) Please respond ASAP: workplace telepressure and employee recovery. J Occup Health Psychol 20:172Google Scholar
  12. Bateson G (1979) Mind and nature: a necessary unity. Dutton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Bednarek R, Paroutis S, Sillince J (2017) Transcendence through rhetorical practices: responding to paradox in the science sector. Organ Stud 38:77–101Google Scholar
  14. Belkic KL, Landsbergis PA, Schnall PL, Baker D (2004) Is job strain a major source of cardiovascular disease risk? Scand J Work Environ Health 30:85–128Google Scholar
  15. Blagoev B (2015) Arbeitszeitregime im Lock -in? Eine pfadtheoretische Untersuchung der Persistenz überlanger Arbeitszeiten in einem Beratungsunternehmen. Dissertation, Freie Universität BerlinGoogle Scholar
  16. Bos-Nehles A, Renkema M, Janssen M (2017) HRM and innovative work behaviour: a systematic literature review. Pers Rev 46:1228–1253.  https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-09-2016-0257 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Boswell WR, Olson-Buchanan JB (2007) The use of communication technologies after hours: the role of work attitudes and work-life conflict. J Manag 33:592–610Google Scholar
  18. Brennen JS, Kreiss D (2016) Digitalization. In: Jensen KB, Rothenbuhler EW, Pooley JD, Craig RT (eds) The international encyclopedia of communication theory and philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, pp 556–566Google Scholar
  19. Brosch E, Binnewies C (2018) A diary study on predictors of the work-life interface: the role of time pressure, psychological climate and positive affective states. mrev manag rev 29:55–78Google Scholar
  20. Cingöz A, Akdoğan AA (2011) An empirical examination of performance and image outcome expectation as determinants of innovative behavior in the workplace. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 24:847–853.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clark SC (2000) Work/family border theory: a new theory of work/family balance. Hum Relat 53:747–770Google Scholar
  22. Comelli G, Rosenstiel LV (2003) Führung durch motivation. mitarbeiter für organisationsziele gewinnen. Vahlen, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  23. Damanpour F (1991) Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad Manag J 34:555–590.  https://doi.org/10.5465/256406 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Darini M, Pazhouhesh H, Moshiri F (2011) Relationship between employee’s innovation (creativity) and time management. Proced Soc Behav Sci 25:201–213.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.541 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. De Jong J, Den Hartog D (2010) Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creat Innov Manag 19:23–36.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Derks D, van Mierlo H, Schmitz EB (2014) A diary study on work-related smartphone use, psychological detachment and exhaustion: Examining the role of the perceived segmentation norm. J Occup Health Psychol 19:74Google Scholar
  27. Desrochers S, Sargent L (2004) Boundary/border theory and work-family integration. Organ Manag J 1:40–48Google Scholar
  28. Etzion D, Eden D, Lapidot Y (1998) Relief from job stressors and burnout: reserve service as a respite. J Appl Psychol 83:577Google Scholar
  29. Feuerhahn N, Kühnel J, Kudielka BM (2012) Interaction effects of effort-reward imbalance and overcommitment on emotional exhaustion and job performance. Int J Stress Manag 19:105Google Scholar
  30. Gascoigne C, Parry E, Buchanan D (2015) Extreme work, gendered work? How extreme jobs and the discourse of ‘personal choice’ perpetuate gender inequality. Organization 22:457–475Google Scholar
  31. Gawke JC, Gorgievski MJ, Bakker AB (2017) Employee intrapreneurship and work engagement: a latent change score approach. J Vocat Behav 100:88–100Google Scholar
  32. Gawke JC, Gorgievski MJ, Bakker AB (2019) Measuring intrapreneurship at the individual level: development and validation of the Employee Intrapreneurship Scale (EIS). Eur Manag J (in press)Google Scholar
  33. Gerdes J (2018) Codebuch DGB-Index Gute Arbeit für den basis datensatz mit oversamples mit fragen zum betriebsrat (2012–2017). Institut DGB-Index Gute Arbeit, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  34. gfu (2015) Immer weniger Trennung von Freizeit und Arbeit. Berufstätige bleiben häufig auch in der Freizeit mit dem Job verbunden. http://www.gfu.de/presseraum/uebersicht/immer-weniger-trennung-von-freizeit-und-arbeit/. Accessed August 28 2019
  35. Ghosh K (2015) Developing organizational creativity and innovation: toward a model of self-leadership, employee creativity, creativity climate and workplace innovative orientation. Manag Res Rev 38:1126–1148.  https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-01-2014-0017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Griffin JM, Fuhrer R, Stansfeld SA, Marmot M (2002) The importance of low control at work and home on depression and anxiety: do these effects vary by gender and social class? Soc Sci Med 54:783–798Google Scholar
  37. Hammond MM, Neff NL, Farr JL, Schwall AR, Zhao X (2011) Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts 5:90Google Scholar
  38. Hardt JV (2012) Innovationskompetenz: Entwicklung und Validierung eines neuen Konstrukts. Dissertation, Universität SiegenGoogle Scholar
  39. Heinonen J, Korvela K (2003) How about measuring intrapreneurship. Small Business Institute, Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, TurkuGoogle Scholar
  40. Hinterhuber HH (2015) Strategische Unternehmensführung: Das Gesamtmodell für nachhaltige Wertsteigerung. Schmidt, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  41. Hogan B, Fisher D (2006) A scale for measuring email overload. Microsoft Research. MSR-TR-2006-65Google Scholar
  42. Janssen O (2000) Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. J Occup Organ Psychol 73:287–302.  https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Karasek RA Jr (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Admin Sci Q 24:285–308Google Scholar
  44. Kelly EL, Moen P, Tranby E (2011) Changing workplaces to reduce work-family conflict: schedule control in a white-collar organization. Am Sociol Rev 76:265–290Google Scholar
  45. Klarner P, Treffers T, Picot A (2013) How companies motivate entrepreneurial employees: the case of organizational spin-alongs. J Bus Econ 83:319–355Google Scholar
  46. Kreiner GE (2006) Consequences of work-home segmentation or integration: a person-environment fit perspective. J Organ Behav 27:485–507Google Scholar
  47. Lukes M, Stephan U (2017) Measuring employee innovation: a review of existing scales and the development of the innovative behavior and innovation support inventories across cultures. Int J Entrep Behav Res 23:136–158.  https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-11-2015-0262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Maier N (2019) Definition, ursachen und auswirkungen erweiterter berufsbezogener erreichbarkeit. Erweiterte berufsbezogene Erreichbarkeit. Springer, Wien, pp 9–43Google Scholar
  49. Marlin D, Geiger SW (2015) A reexamination of the organizational slack and innovation relationship. J Bus Res 68:2683–2690Google Scholar
  50. Maschke M, Nies G, Vogl G (2014) Mobile arbeit: zwischen autonomie und fremdbestimmung (Mobile work: between autonomy and heteronomy). WSI Mitt 67:156–159Google Scholar
  51. McLean LD (2005) Organizational culture’s influence on creativity and innovation: a review of the literature and implications for human resource development. Adv Dev Hum Resour 7:226–246Google Scholar
  52. Meijman TF, Mulder G (1998) Psychological aspects of workload. In: Drenth P, Thierry H, de Wolff J (eds) Handbook of work and organizational psychology, vol 2. Taylor & Francis, Hove, p 29Google Scholar
  53. Messmann G, Mulder RH (2012) Development of a measurement instrument for innovative work behaviour as a dynamic and context-bound construct. Hum Resour Dev Int 15:43–59.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2011.646894 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mintzberg H (2003) The Structuring of Organizations. In: Mintzberg H, Ghoshal S, Lampel J, Quinn JB (eds) The strategy process: concepts, contexts, cases. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, pp 209–226Google Scholar
  55. Moldaschl M, Voß GG (2002) Subjektivierung von Arbeit. Hampp, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  56. Ohly S, Sonnentag S, Niessen C, Zapf D (2010) Diary studies in organizational research: an introduction and some practical recommendations. J Person Psychol 9:93.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pangert B, Schüpbach H (2013) Die Auswirkungen arbeitsbezogener erweiterter erreichbarkeit auf life-domain-balance und gesundheit (The effects of work-related extended availability on life-domain-balance and health). Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Dortmund (in German) Google Scholar
  58. Parker SC (2011) Intrapreneurship or entrepreneurship? J Bus Ventur 26:19–34Google Scholar
  59. Peters K (2005) Wie Krokodile Vertrauen schaffen Vertrauensarbeitszeit-Arbeitszeitkonten-Flexi-Modelle Konzepte und betriebliche Praxis VSA, 63–76Google Scholar
  60. Pocock B, Skinner N (2013) Morning, noon and night: the infiltration of work email into personal and family life. Centre for Work + Life, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  61. Ramamoorthy N, Flood PC, Slattery T, Sardessai R (2005) Determinants of innovative work behaviour: development and test of an integrated model. Creat Innov Manag 14:142–150.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2005.00334.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rexroth M, Sonntag K, Goecke T, Klöpfer A, Mensmann M (2014) Wirkung von Anforderungen und Ressourcen auf die Zufriedenheit mit der Work-Life-Balance Arbeit und Privatleben harmonisieren Life Balance Forschung und Unternehmenskultur: Das WLB-Projekt, 85–128Google Scholar
  63. Richter A, Heinrich P, Stocker A, Schwabe G (2018) Digital work design. Bus Inform Syst Eng 60:259–264Google Scholar
  64. Rödel A, Siegrist J, Hessel A, Brähler E (2004) Psychometrische testung des fragebogens zur messung beruflicher gratifikationskrisen an einer repräsentativen deutschen stichprobe. Z Differ Diagn Psychol 25:227–238Google Scholar
  65. Schieman S, Glavin P, Milkie MA (2009) When work interferes with life: work-nonwork interference and the influence of work-related demands and resources. Am Sociol Rev 74:966–988Google Scholar
  66. Schumpeter J (1912) Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Duncker & Humblot, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  67. Siegrist J, Starke D, Chandola T, Godin I, Marmot M, Niedhammer I, Peter R (2004) The measurement of effort–reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Soc Sci Med 58:1483–1499Google Scholar
  68. Siegrist J, Wege N, Pühlhofer F, Wahrendorf M (2009) A short generic measure of work stress in the era of globalization: effort–reward imbalance. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82:1005Google Scholar
  69. Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH, van der Beek AJ, Meijman TF (2001) The relation between work-induced neuroendocrine reactivity and recovery, subjective need for recovery, and health status. J Psychosom Res 50:29–37Google Scholar
  70. Sonnentag S (2012) Psychological detachment from work during leisure time: the benefits of mentally disengaging from work. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 21:114–118Google Scholar
  71. Sonnentag S, Bayer U-V (2005) Switching off mentally: predictors and consequences of psychological detachment from work during off-job time. J Occup Health Psychol 10:393Google Scholar
  72. Sonnentag S, Fritz C (2007) The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. J Occup Health Psychol 12:204Google Scholar
  73. Sonnentag S, Kruel U (2006) Psychological detachment from work during off-job time: The role of job stressors, job involvement, and recovery-related self-efficacy. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 15:197–217Google Scholar
  74. Sonnentag S, Binnewies C, Mojza EJ (2008) Did you have a nice evening? A day-level study on recovery experiences, sleep, and affect. J Appl Psychol 93:674Google Scholar
  75. Sonnentag S, Binnewies C, Mojza EJ (2010) Staying well and engaged when demands are high: the role of psychological detachment. J Appl Psychol 95:965Google Scholar
  76. Stolterman E, Fors AC (2004) Information technology and the good life. Information systems research. Springer, New York, pp 687–692Google Scholar
  77. Stummer H (2007) Entsolidarisierung von Führungsverhalten und mögliche auswirkungen auf die gesundheit. Ind Bezieh 14:270–278Google Scholar
  78. Ulich E, Wiese BS (2011) Life domain balance: Konzepte zur Verbesserung der Lebensqualität. Gabler, Wiesbaden.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-6489-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Unfallversicherung DDG (2012) Ständige Erreichbarkeit: Wie belastet sind wir? Ursachen und Folgen ständiger Erreichbarkeit, IAG Report, Nr. 1Google Scholar
  80. Voß GG (1998) Die entgrenzung von arbeit und arbeitskraft. Mitt Arbeitsmarkt Berufsforsch 31:473–487Google Scholar
  81. Wendsche J, Lohmann-Haislah A (2017) A meta-analysis on antecedents and outcomes of detachment from work. Front Psychol 7:2072Google Scholar
  82. Williamson J, Eaker P, Lounsbury J (2012) The information overload scale. In: Paper presented at the association for information science & technology (ASIST), Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  83. Wolcott RC, Lippitz MJ (2007) The four models of corporate entrepreneurship. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 49:75Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department for Public Health, Health Services Research and HTAUMIT - Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and TechnologyHall in TirolAustria
  2. 2.Institute for Management and Economics in Healthcare, Department for Public Health, Health Services Research and HTAUMIT - Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and TechnologyHall in TirolAustria

Personalised recommendations