Advertisement

Journal of Business Economics

, Volume 83, Issue 8, pp 863–900 | Cite as

Shades of gray: effect of external work arrangements on firm performance under operational and strategic contingencies

  • Ricarda B. BounckenEmail author
  • Christian Lehmann
  • Martin Ratzmann
Original Paper

Abstract

This study builds on recent research on the external workforce by examining the effects of (1) temporary work (2) independent contracting, and (3) consulting on firm performance, considering the client firms’ tasks, the qualification requirements for carrying out these tasks, and its strategic context. The findings are based on a survey of 261 firms in the German manufacturing industry. At the operational level, the results indicate that the difficulty of the tasks to be performed by external workers influences their performance. Whilst temporary work and consulting are better suited for simple tasks with low qualification requirements, independent contracting increases firm performance when appointing individuals to perform complex tasks. At the strategic level we research effects by two strategic orientations; one generally increasing the internal innovation performance (innovation orientation), the other generally increasing the performance of external relationships (alliance orientation). The innovation orientation here reduces the negative effect of temporary work, whereas a high alliance orientation precipitates a positive effect of consulting on firm performance. This paper demonstrates that clients’ task requirements and their alignment towards innovation and alliances have a significant influence on the benefits to the firm conveyed by highly qualified externals.

Keywords

External work arrangements Temporary work Independent contracting Consulting Task structure 

JEL Classification

J21 M12 O30 

References

  1. Abraham KG, Taylor SK (1996) Firms’ use of outside contractors: theory and evidence. J Lab Econ 14(3):394–424Google Scholar
  2. Alewell D, Bähring K, Thommes K (2005) Institutional structures of the flexible assignment of personnel between enterprises: an economic comparison of temporary work, interim management, and consulting. Manag Rev 16(4):475–493Google Scholar
  3. Ang S, Slaughter SA (2001) Work outcomes and job design for contract versus permanent information systems professionals on software development teams. MIS Q 25(3):321–350Google Scholar
  4. Ang S, Straub DW (1998) Production and transaction economies and IS outsourcing: a study of the US banking industry. MIS Q 22(4):535–552Google Scholar
  5. Appiah-Adu K, Singh S (1998) Market orientation and performance: an empirical study of British SMEs. J Entrep 7(1):27–47Google Scholar
  6. Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Mark Res 14:396–402Google Scholar
  7. Atkinson J (1984) Flexibility, uncertainty and manpower management. IMS Report No. 89. Institute of Manpower Studies. University of Sussex, BrightonGoogle Scholar
  8. Autor DH (2003) Outsourcing at will: the contribution of unjust dismissal doctrine to the growth of employment outsourcing. J Lab Econ 21(1):1–42Google Scholar
  9. Baker T, Miner AS, Eesley DT (2003) Improvising firms: bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Res Policy 32(2):255–276Google Scholar
  10. Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182Google Scholar
  11. Belous RS (1995) Rise of the contingent work force: the key challenges and opportunities. Wash Lee Law Rev 52(3):863–878Google Scholar
  12. Bennett RJ, LA Robson P (1999) The use of external business advice by SMEs in Britain. Entrep Reg Dev 11(2):155–180Google Scholar
  13. Berry AJ, Sweeting R, Goto J (2006) The effect of business advisers on the performance of SMEs. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 13(1):33–47Google Scholar
  14. Bettis R, Hitt M (1995) The new competitive landscape. Strateg Manag J 16(S1):7–19Google Scholar
  15. Bhattacharya R, Devinnex T, Pillutla M (1998) A formal model of trust based on outcomes. Acad Manag Rev 23(3):459–472Google Scholar
  16. Bhattacharya M, Gibson DE, Doty DH (2005) The effects of flexibility in employee skills, employee behaviors, and human resource practices on firm performance. J Manag 3(4):622–640Google Scholar
  17. Bidwell MJ (2009) Do peripheral workers do peripheral work? Comparing the use of highly skilled contractors and regular employees. Ind Lab Relat Rev 62(2):200–225Google Scholar
  18. Bidwell MJ, Briscoe F (2009) Who contracts? Determinants of the decision to work as an independent contractor among information technology workers. Acad Manag J 52(6):1148–1168Google Scholar
  19. Bouncken RB, Koch M, Teichert T (2007) Innovation strategy explored: innovation orientation’s strategy preconditions and market performance outcomes. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 77(2):19–43Google Scholar
  20. Brockman BK, Morgan RM (2003) The role of existing knowledge in new product innovativeness and performance. Decis Sci 34(2):385–419Google Scholar
  21. Bruhn M, Stauss B (2006) Dienstleistungscontrolling-Einführung in die theoretischen und praktischen Problemstellungen. Dienstleistungscontrolling, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  22. Burns T, Stalker GM (1961) The management of innovation. Tavistock, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Calantone RJ, Cavusgil ST, Zhao Y (2002) Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Ind Mark Manage 31(6):515–524Google Scholar
  24. Caroli E (2007) Internal versus external labour flexibility: the role of knowledge codification. Natl Inst Econ Rev 201:107–118Google Scholar
  25. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35(1):128–152Google Scholar
  26. Connelly CE, Gallagher DG (2003) Managing contingent workers: adapting to new realities. In: Burke RJ, Cooper CL (eds) Leading in turbulent times: managing in the new world of work. Blackwell Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Connelly CE, Gallagher DG (2004) Emerging trends in contingent work research. J Manag 30(6):959–983Google Scholar
  28. Crimmann A, Ellguth P, Kohaut S, Lehmer F, Ziegler K (2009) Forschungsbericht zum Thema Arbeitnehmerüberlassung. Nürnberg, IABGoogle Scholar
  29. Das TK, Teng BS (1998) Resource and risk management in the strategic alliance process. J Manag 24(1):21–42Google Scholar
  30. Davis-Blake A, Uzzi B (1993) Determinants of employment externalization: a study of temporary workers and independent contractors. Adm Sci Q 38(2):195–223Google Scholar
  31. Dent EB, Goldberg SG (1999) Challenging resistance to change. J Appl Behav Sci 35(1):25–41Google Scholar
  32. Dussage P, Garrette B, Mitchell W (2000) Learning from competing partners: outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia. Strateg Manag J 21(2):99–126Google Scholar
  33. Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strateg Manag J 21(10–11):1105–1121Google Scholar
  34. Federal Bureau of Statistics (2012a) Produzierendes Gewerbe: Betriebe, Tätige Personen und Umsatz des Verarbeitenden Gewerbes sowie des Bergbaus und der Gewinnung von Steinen und Erden nach Beschäftigtengrößenklassen. Fachserie 4, Reihe 4.1.2Google Scholar
  35. Federal Bureau of Statistics (2012b) Produzierendes Gewerbe: Kostenstruktur der Unternehmen des Verarbeitenden Gewerbes sowie des Bergbaus und der Gewinnung von Steinen und Erden. Fachserie 4, Reihe 4.3Google Scholar
  36. Felstead A, Gallie D, Green F, Zhou Y (2007) Skills at work, 1986 to 2006. ESRC Centre on Skills, Knowledge and Organisational Performance, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  37. Fincham R (1999) The consultant–client relationship: Critical perspectives on the management of organizational change. J Manag Stud 36(3):335–351Google Scholar
  38. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50Google Scholar
  39. Frazier PA, Tix AP, Barron KE (2004) Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. J Couns Psychol 51(1):115–134Google Scholar
  40. Gainey TW, Klaas BS (2005) Outsourcing relationships between firms and their training providers. Hum Resour Dev Q 16(1):7–25Google Scholar
  41. Gallagher DG, Sverke M (2005) Contingent employment contracts: are existing theories still relevant? Econ Ind Democr 26(2):181–203Google Scholar
  42. Garen J (2006) Use of employees and alternative work arrangements in the United States: a law, economics, and organizations perspective. Lab Econ 13(1):107–141Google Scholar
  43. Garratt R (1981) From expertise to contingency: changes in the nature of consulting. Manag Learn 12(2):95–101Google Scholar
  44. Gatignon H, Xuereb JM (1997) Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. J Mark Res 34(1):77–90Google Scholar
  45. Gooderham P, Tobiassen A, Døving E, Nordhaug O (2004) Accountants as sources of business advice for small firms. Int Small Bus J 22(1):5–22Google Scholar
  46. Gramm CL, Schnell JF (2000) Use of flexible staffing arrangements in core production jobs. Ind Lab Relat Rev 54(2):245–258Google Scholar
  47. Hagedoorn J, Schakenraad J (1994) The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. Strateg Manag J 15(4):291–309Google Scholar
  48. Heimeriks KH, Duysters G (2007) Alliance capability as a mediator between experience and alliance performance: an empirical investigation into the alliance capability development process. J Manag Stud 44(1):25–49Google Scholar
  49. Hijzen A, Goerg H, Hine RC (2005) International outsourcing and the skill structure of labour demand in the United Kingdom. Econ J 115(506):860–878Google Scholar
  50. Hoang H, Rothaermel FT (2005) The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance. Acad Manag J 48(2):332–345Google Scholar
  51. Holst H, Nachtwey O, Doerre K (2010) The strategic use of temporary agency work—functional change of a non-standard form of employment. Int J Action Res 6(1):108–138Google Scholar
  52. Houseman SN (2001) Why employers use flexible staffing arrangements: evidence from an establishing survey. Ind Lab Relat Rev 55(1):149–170Google Scholar
  53. Houseman SN, Kalleberg AL, Erickcek GA (2003) The role of temporary agency employment in tight labor markets. Ind Lab Relat Rev 57(1):105–127Google Scholar
  54. Hult GTM, Ketchen DJ, Slater SF (2005) Market orientation and performance: an integration of disparate approaches. Strateg Manag J 26(12):1173–1181Google Scholar
  55. Hurley RF, Hult GTM (1998) Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning. J Mark 62(3):42–54Google Scholar
  56. Kalleberg AL (2000) Nonstandard employment relations: part-time, temporary and contract work. Ann Rev Sociol 26:341–365Google Scholar
  57. Kalleberg AL (2001) Organizing flexibility: the flexible firm in a new century. Br J Ind Relat 39(4):479–504Google Scholar
  58. Kalleberg AL, Reynolds J, Marsden PV (2003) Externalizing employment: flexible staffing arrangements in US organizations. Soc Sci Res 32(4):525–552Google Scholar
  59. Kandemir D, Yaprak A, Cavusgil S (2006) Alliance orientation: conceptualization, measurement, and impact on market performance. J Acad Mark Sci 34(3):324–340Google Scholar
  60. Katz R, Allen TJ (1982) Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: a look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D Project Groups. R&D Manag 12(1):7–20Google Scholar
  61. Kieser A (1996) Moden & Mythen des Organisierens. Betriebswirtschaft 56(1):21–40Google Scholar
  62. Ko D, Kirsch L, King W (2005) Antecedents of knowledge transfer from consultants to clients in enterprise system implementations. MIS Q 29(1):59–85Google Scholar
  63. Kotabe M, Swan KS (1995) The role of strategic alliances in high-technology new product development. Strateg Manag J 16(8):621–636Google Scholar
  64. Kunda G, Barley SR, Evans J (2002) Why do contractors contract? The experience of highly skilled technical professionals in a contingent labor market. Ind Lab Relat Rev 55(2):234–261Google Scholar
  65. Lautsch BA (2002) Uncovering and explaining variance in the features and outcomes of contingent work. Ind Lab Relat Rev 56(1):23–43Google Scholar
  66. Lepak DP, Snell SA (1999) The human resource architecture: toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Acad Manag Rev 24(1):31–48Google Scholar
  67. Lepak DP, Takeuchi R, Snell SA (2003) Employment flexibility and firm performance: examining the interaction effects of employment mode, environmental dynamism, and technological intensity. J Manag 29(5):681–703Google Scholar
  68. Little TD, Card NA, Bovaird JA, Preacher KJ, Crandall CS (2007) Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies. Taylor & Francis, FlorenceGoogle Scholar
  69. Lorenzoni G, Lipparini A (1999) The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study. Strateg Manag J 20(4):317–338Google Scholar
  70. Mangum G, Mayall D, Nelson K (1985) The temporary help industry: a response to the dual internal labor market. Ind Lab Relat Rev 38(4):599–611Google Scholar
  71. Manu F (1992) Innovation orientation, environment and performance: a comparison of U.S. and European Markets. J Int Bus Stud 29(2):239–247Google Scholar
  72. March JG, Sutton RI (1997) Organizational performance as a dependent variable. Organ Sci 8(2):698–706Google Scholar
  73. Matiaske W, Mellewigt T (2002) Motive, Erfolge und Risiken des Outsourcing - Befunde und Defizite. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 72(6):641–659Google Scholar
  74. Matusik S, Hill C (1998) The utilization of contingent work, knowledge creation, and competitive advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23(4):680–697Google Scholar
  75. Meeker BF (1983) Cooperative orientation, trust, and reciprocity. Hum Relat 37(3):225–243Google Scholar
  76. Mitlacher LW (2006) The organization of Human Resource Management in temporary work agencies. Hum Resour Manag Rev 16(1):67–81Google Scholar
  77. Mitlacher LW (2007) The role of temporary agency work in different industrial relations systems: a comparison between Germany and the USA. Br J Ind Relat 45(3):581–606Google Scholar
  78. Monteverde K, Teece DJ (1982) Supplier switching costs and vertical integration in the automobile industry. Bell J Econ 13(1):206–213Google Scholar
  79. Mowery DC, Oxley JE, Silverman BS (1996) Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strateg Manag J 17(Special Winter Issue):77–91Google Scholar
  80. Narver JC, Slater SF (1990) The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. J Mark 54(4):20–35Google Scholar
  81. Nesheim T (2003) Using external work arrangements in core value-creation areas. Eur Manag J 21(4):528–537Google Scholar
  82. Nielen S, Schiersch A (2011) Temporary agency work and firm performance. Düsseldorf, Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der LänderGoogle Scholar
  83. Oberst M, Schank T (2007) Interne Arbeitsmärkte und Einsatz temporärer Arbeitsverhältnisse: Eine Fallstudie mit Daten eines deutschen Dienstleistungsunternehmens. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 77(11):1159–1177Google Scholar
  84. Origo F, Pagani L (2009) Flexicurity and job satisfaction in Europe. Lab Econ 16(5):547–555Google Scholar
  85. Osterman P (1987) Choice of employment systems in internal labor markets. Ind Relat 26(1):46–67Google Scholar
  86. Perrow C (1967) A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. Am Sociol Rev 32(2):194–208Google Scholar
  87. Pfeifer C (2005) Flexibility, dual labour markets, and temporary employment. Empirical evidence from German establishment data. Manag Rev 16(3):404–422Google Scholar
  88. Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manag 12(4):530–544Google Scholar
  89. Polivka AE (1996) Contingent and alternative work arrangements defined. Mon Lab Rev 119(10):3–9Google Scholar
  90. Polivka AE, Nardone T (1989) On the definition of contingent work. Mon Lab Rev 112(12):9–14Google Scholar
  91. Preacher KJ, Rucker DD (2007) Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivar Behav Res 42(1):185–227Google Scholar
  92. Promberger M, Theuer S (2004) Welche Betriebe nutzen Leiharbeit? Verbreitung und Typik von Einsatzbetrieben und Arbeitsumwelten von Leiharbeitern. In: Vogel B (ed) Leiharbeit: Neue sozialwissenschaftliche Befunde zu einer prekären Beschäftigungsform. Hamburg, VSA-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  93. Pugh DS (1973) Does context determine form? In: Pugh DS (ed) Organization theory, 4th edn. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  94. Quick R, Wiemann D (2011) Zum Einfluss der Mandatsdauer des Abschlussprüfers auf die Prüfungsqualität. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 81(9):1–29Google Scholar
  95. Reilly P (1998) Balancing flexibility-meeting the interests of employer and employee. Eur J Work Org Psychol 7(1):7–22Google Scholar
  96. Rogers EM (1983) The diffusion of innovation, 3rd edn. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  97. Rousseau DM (1995) Psychological contracts in organizations: understanding written and unwritten agreements. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  98. Rousseau DM (2001) The idiosyncratic deal: flexibility versus fairness? Organ Dyn 29(4):260–273Google Scholar
  99. Sanchez R (2000) Modular architectures, knowledge assets and organisational learning: new management processes for product creation. Int J Technol Manag 19(6):610–629Google Scholar
  100. Sarvary M (1999) Knowledge management and competition in the consulting industry. Calif Manag Rev 41(2):95–107Google Scholar
  101. Shan W, Walker G, Kogut B (1994) Interfirm cooperation and start-up innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strateg Manag J 15(5):387–394Google Scholar
  102. Sharma A, Durand RM, Gur-Arie O (1981) Identification and analysis of moderator variables. J Mark Res 18(3):291–300Google Scholar
  103. Sharma A (1997) Professional as agent: knowledge asymmetry in agency exchange. Acad Manag Rev 22(3):758–798Google Scholar
  104. Siguaw JA, Simpson PM, Enz EA (2006) Conceptualizing innovation orientation: a framework for study and integration of innovation research. J Prod Innov Manag 23(6):556–574Google Scholar
  105. Simpson PM, Siguaw JA, Enz EA (2006) Innovation orientation outcomes: the good and the bad. J Bus Res 59(10–11):1133–1141Google Scholar
  106. Sirmon DG, Hitt MA, Arregle JL, Campbell JT (2010) The dynamic interplay of capability strengths and weaknesses: Investigating the bases of temporary competitive advantage. Strateg Manag J 31(13):1386–1409Google Scholar
  107. Sluyts K, Matthyssens P, Martens R, Streukens S (2011) Building capabilities to manage strategic alliances. Ind Mark Manage 40(6):875–886Google Scholar
  108. Song J, Ameida P, Wu G (2003) Learning-by-hiring: when is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Manag Sci 49(4):351–365Google Scholar
  109. Storey J, Quintas P, Taylor P, Fowle W (2002) Flexible employment contracts and their implications for product and process innovation. Int J Hum Resour Manag 13(1):1–18Google Scholar
  110. Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18(7):509–533Google Scholar
  111. Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in action. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  112. Thompson JD, Bates FL (1957) Technology, organization, and administration. Adm Sci Q 2(3):325–343Google Scholar
  113. Van de Ven AH, Delbecq AL (1974) A task contingent model of work-unit structure. Adm Sci Q 19(2):183–197Google Scholar
  114. Van de Ven AH, Delbecq AL, Koenig R (1976) Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. Am Sociol Rev 41(2):322–338Google Scholar
  115. Von Hippel C, Mangum SL, Greenberger DB, Heneman RL, Skoglind JD (1997) Temporary employment: can organizations and employees both win? Acad Manag Exec 11(1):93–104Google Scholar
  116. Venkatraman N, Ramanujam V (1986) Measurement of business performance in strategy research: a comparison of approaches. Acad Manag Rev 11(4):801–814Google Scholar
  117. Verona G, Ravasi D (2003) Unbundling dynamic capabilities: an exploratory study of continuous product innovation. Ind Corp Change 12(3):577Google Scholar
  118. Vidal M, Tigges LM (2009) Temporary employment and strategic staffing in the manufacturing sector. Ind Relat 48(1):55–72Google Scholar
  119. Walwei U, Ziegler K (2012) Die Bedeutung der Zeitarbeit für den Arbeitsmarkt. In: Bouncken RB, Bornewasser M, Bellmann L (eds) Die neue Rolle der Zeitarbeit in Deutschland. München/Mering, Hampp, pp 9–24Google Scholar
  120. Wang CL, Ahmed PK (2007) Dynamic capabilities: a review and research agenda. Int J Manag Rev 9(1):31–51Google Scholar
  121. Williamson O (1981) The economics of organization: the transaction cost approach. Am J Sociol 87(3):548–577Google Scholar
  122. Wilson B (2010) Using PLS to investigate interaction effects. In: Vinzi VE, Chin WW (eds) Handbook of partial least squares. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 621–652Google Scholar
  123. Wincent J (2008) An exchange approach on firm cooperative orientation and outcomes of strategic multilateral network participants. Group Organ Manag 33(3):303–329Google Scholar
  124. Wood RE, Mento AJ, Locke EA (1987) Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol 72(3):416–425Google Scholar
  125. Wright PM, Snell SA (1998) Toward a unifying framework for exploring fit and flexibility in strategic human resource management. Acad Manag Rev 23(4):756–772Google Scholar
  126. Zaheer A, Bell GG (2005) Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strateg Manag J 26(9):809–825Google Scholar
  127. Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad Manag Rev 27(2):185–203Google Scholar
  128. Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ Sci 13(3):339–351Google Scholar
  129. Zollo M, Reuer JJ, Singh H (2002) Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organ Sci 13(6):701–713Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ricarda B. Bouncken
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christian Lehmann
    • 1
  • Martin Ratzmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Chair of Strategic Management and OrganizationUniversity of BayreuthBayreuthGermany

Personalised recommendations