Advertisement

Journal of Business Economics

, Volume 83, Issue 5, pp 471–503 | Cite as

The financial structure of innovative SMEs in Germany

  • Detlev Hummel
  • Boris Karcher
  • Christian Schultz
Original Paper

Abstract

In politics and business the special role of innovative businesses whose research and development activities expedite technological progress has received steady attention. Especially small and medium sized businesses (SMEs) have initiated promising innovation projects. However, when analysing these projects our research must take into account that SMEs cannot be viewed as a homogeneous business category. Moreover, financing their innovations, SMEs are subject to unique issues. To shed light on these problems, this study will develop an index measuring degrees of innovation. It allows the 171 sample companies to be categorised into three groups: non-innovative, moderately innovative or highly innovative. A multinomial logistic regression is used to examine the quality of this typology. In addition, group-specific differences in the financing mix are demonstrated. Finally, from a theoretical point of view, the implications of the pecking order theory are basically validated. On the other hand, the concept of the financial growth cycle does not deliver satisfactory results.

Keywords

Small and medium-sized business financing SMEs Degree of innovation Innovation financing Financing of innovative businesses 

JEL Classification

G32 O31 O39 

References

  1. Arrow KJ (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In: Nelson RR (ed) The rate and direction of inventive activity. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, pp 609–625Google Scholar
  2. Audretsch DB (1995) Innovation, growth and survival. Int J Ind Organ 13(4):441–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Audretsch DB, Lehmann EE (2004) Financing high-tech growth: the role of banks and venture capitalists. Schmalenbach Bus Rev 56(4):340–357Google Scholar
  4. Autio E (1997) New, technology-based firms in innovation networks symplectic and generative impacts. Res Pol 26:263–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Backes-Gellner U, Werner A (2007) Entrepreneurial signaling via education: a success factor in innovative start-ups. Small Bus Econ 29:173–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Backhaus K et al (2008) Multivariate Analysemethoden—Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung, 12th edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker BO et al (1966) Weak measurements vs. strong statistics: an empirical critique of S.S. Stevens’s proscriptions on statistics. Edu Psych Meas 26:291–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bartelsman E et al (2004) Microeconomic evidence of creative distruction in industrial and developing counties. World Bank Policy Research Paper No. 3463, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Berger AN, Udell GF (1995) Relationship lending and lines of credit in small firm finance. J Bus 68:351–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berger AN, Udell GF (1998) The economics of small business finance: the roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. J Bank Financ 22:613–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berggren B, Olofsson C, Silver L (2000) Control aversion and the search for external financing in Swedish SMEs. Small Bus Econ 15(3):233–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. BMWi (2007) Gründerzeiten, Informationen zur Existenzgründung und—sicherung, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  13. Bortz J (1989) Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  14. Bortz J, Döring N (1995) Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation, 2. Auflage, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  15. Bortz J, Schuster C (2010) Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler, 7. Aufl. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bozkaya A, De La Potterie B (2008) Who Funds Technology-Based Small Firms? Evidence From Belgium. Econ Innov New Technol, Taylor and Francis J 17(1–2):97–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cainelli G et al (2006) Innovation and economic performance in services—a firm-level analysis. Camb J Econ 30:435–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carpenter RE, Petersen BC (2002) Is the growth of small firms constrained by internal finance? Rev Econ Stat 84(2):298–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chittenden F, Hall G, Hutchinson P (1996) Small firm growth, access to capital markets and financial structure: review of issues and an empirical investigation. Small Bus Econ 8:59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cuervo-Cazurra A, Un A (2010) Why some firms never invest in formal R&D. Strateg Manag J 31(7):759–779Google Scholar
  21. Czarnitzki D, Hottenrott H (2010) Financing constraints for industrial innovation: What do we know? LeuvenGoogle Scholar
  22. Denis DJ (2004) Entrepreneurial finance: an overview of the issue and evidence. J Corp Financ 10:301–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dosi G (1990) Finance, innovation, and industrial change. J Econ Behav Organ 13:299–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ehrhard N, Müller K (2007) Business Angel-Finanzierung in Deutschland—Ein Marktüberblick. Finanz Betrieb 9:65–71Google Scholar
  25. Elsas R, Florysiak D (2008) Empirical capital structure research: new ideas, recent evidence, and methodological issues. In: Breuer W, Gurtler M (eds) 50 years after MM: recent developments in corporate finance. Gabler, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  26. Fontes M, Coombs R (2001) Contribution of new-technology-based firms to the strengthening of technological capabilities in intermediate economies. Res Policy 30:79–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Freel M (2007) Are small innovators credit rationed? Small Bus Econ 28:23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fryges, H. et al (2007) Hightech-Gründungen und Business Angels, Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie. (BMWi) (Hrsg.), BerlinGoogle Scholar
  29. Gompers PA, Lerner J (2003) Equity financing. In: Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB (eds) Handbook of entrepreneurship research. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  30. Gottschalk S et al (2007) Start-Ups zwischen Forschung und Finanzierung: Hightech Gründungen in Deutschland, MannheimGoogle Scholar
  31. Grabherr O (2001) Risikokapitalinstrumente im unternehmerischen Wachstumszyklus. In: Wilfried S (eds) Venture capital und private equity: Erfolgreich wachsen mit Beteiligungskapital, Köln, pp 29–42Google Scholar
  32. Grinstein A, Goldman A (2006) Characterizing the technology firm: an exploratory study. Res Policy 35:121–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hagedoorn J, Cloodt M (2003) Measuring innovative performance—Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Res Policy 32:1365–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hall BH (2002) The financing of research and development. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 18(1):35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hall BH et al (2009) Innovation and productivity in SMEs: empirical evidence for Italy. Small Bus Econ 33:13–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harhoff D (1998) Are there financing constraints for R&D and investment in German manufacturing firms? Annales D’Economie Et De Statistique Nr 49/50Google Scholar
  37. Heidenreich M (2009) Innovation patterns and location of European low- and medium-technology industries. Res Policy 38:483–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Huang C et al (2010) How firms innovate: R&D, non-R&D, and technology adoption, UNU-Merit Working Paper No. 2010-027, MaastrichtGoogle Scholar
  39. Hughes A (2002) Innovation and business performance: small entrepreneurial firms in the UK and the EU. New Econ 8(3):157–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hyytinen A, Pajarinen M (2002) Financing of technology intensive small business: some evidence from the ICT industry, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Discussions paper No. 813Google Scholar
  41. Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3:305–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. KfW (2007) Mittelstands- und Strukturpolitik, KfW Diskussionspapier Nr. 39. Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  43. KfW (2008) Der informelle Beteiligungskapitalmarkt in Deutschland. WirtschaftsObserver online, KfW Diskussionspapier Nr. 41, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  44. Kirner E et al (2007) Innovationspfade von low-, medium- und High-Tech-Unternehmen in der deutschen Industrie. In: Abel J, Hirsch-Kreinsen H (eds) Lowtech Unternehmen am Hightech-Standort. Sigma, Berlin, pp 165–192Google Scholar
  45. Kirner E et al (2009) Innovation paths and the innovation performance of low-technology firms—An empirical analysis of German industry. Res Policy 38:447–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kleinknecht A (2000) Indicators of manufacturing and service innovation—their strengths and weaknesses. In: Metcalf JS, Miles I (eds) Innovation system and the service economy. Boston, pp 169–186Google Scholar
  47. Kleinknecht A et al (2002) The non-trivial choice between innovation indicators. Econ Innov New Technol 11(2):109–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Krohmer O (2010) Zur Verdrängungswirkung staatlicher FuE-Förderung. In: ifo Dresden berichtet 1/2010, S. 49–51Google Scholar
  49. Mohnen P, Mairesse J (2002) Accounting for innovation and measuring innovativeness: an illustrative framework and an application. Am Econ Rev Papers Proc 92(2):226–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Metzger G et al (2008) High-Tech-Gründungen in Deutschland-Trends, Strukturen, Potentiale, Diskussionspapier des ZEW, MannheimGoogle Scholar
  51. Manual Oslo (2005) Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, 3rd edn. OECD, OsloGoogle Scholar
  52. Meyer JR, Kuh E (1957) The investment decision: an empirical study, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  53. Myers SC (1977) Determinants of corporate borrowing. J Financ Econ 5:146–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Myers SC (1984) The capital structure puzzle. J Financ 34:575–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Myers SC, Majluf NS (1984) Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. J Financ Econ 13:187–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nassimbeni G (2001) Technology, innovation capacity and the export attitude of small manufacturing firms: a logit/tobit model. Res Policy 30:245–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nelson RR (1959) The simple economics of basic scientific research. J Policy Econ 49:297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. NIW/ISI (2006): Neuabgrenzung der Wissenswirtschaft—forschungsintensive Industrien und wissensintensive Dienstleistungen, elektronisch erreichbar unter. http://www.bmbf.de/de/7687.php, abgerufen am 04.05.2011
  59. NIW/ISI/ZEW (2010), Listen wissens- und technologieintensiver Güter und Wirtschaftszweige. http://www.e-fi.de/fileadmin/Studien/Studien_2010/StuDIS_19-2010.pdf, abgerufen am 16.12.2011
  60. Norton E (1990) Similarities and differences in small and large corporation beliefs about capital structure policy. Small Bus Econ 2(3):229–245 Google Scholar
  61. Oakey, R (1984), Innovation and regional growth in small high-technology firms: evidence from Britain and the USA, Reg Stud, 18Google Scholar
  62. Oakey R (1995) High technology new firms: variable barriers to growth. Paul Chapman Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  63. OECD (2002) Frascati Manual—proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  64. Rammer C et al (2011) Innovationen ohne Forschung und Entwicklung, Eine Untersuchung zu Unternehmen, die ohne eigene FuE-Tätigkeit neue Produkte und Prozesse einführen. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem Nr. 15, MannheimGoogle Scholar
  65. Rammer C (2011) Bedeutung von Spitzentechnologien, FuE-Intensität und nicht forschungsintensiven Industrien für Innovationen und Innovationsförderung in Deutschland. ZEW, MannheimGoogle Scholar
  66. Rammer C et al (2009) Innovation success of non-R&D-performers: substituting technology by management in Smes. Small Bus Rev 33:35–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Salomo S et al (2008) Innovation field orientation and its effect on innovativeness and firm performance. J Prod Innov Manag 25(6):560–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schumpeter JA (1934) Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  69. Sohl JE (2008) Angel investors steady but more cautious in first half of 2008. Analysis Report Q1/2 2008, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  70. Spithoven A et al (2009) Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries. Technovation 30:130–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Totterdell P et al (2002) An investigation of the contents and consequences of major organizational innovations. Int J Innov Manag 6:343–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Walker EW, Petty JW (1978) Financial differences between large and small firms. Financ Manag 7(4):61–68Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Detlev Hummel
    • 1
  • Boris Karcher
    • 1
  • Christian Schultz
    • 2
  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für Betriebswirtschaftslehre mit Schwerpunkt Finanzierung und Banken, Universität PotsdamPotsdamGermany
  2. 2.Lehrstuhl für Innovationsmanagement und Entrepreneurship, Universität PotsdamPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations