Criminal Law and Philosophy

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 619–631 | Cite as

Is Coercive Treatment of Offenders Morally Acceptable? On the Deficiency of the Debate

Original Paper

Abstract

Is it morally acceptable to instigate criminal offenders to participate in rehabilitative treatment by offering treatment in return for early release from prison? Some theorists have supported such treatment schemes by pointing to the beneficial consequences that follow from the treatment. Others have suggested that the schemes are unacceptably coercive, which implies that consent becomes an illusion. This paper argues that the discussion—with clear parallels to debates of other healthcare treatment offers in medical ethics—has adopted a too narrow focus. By failing to consider the question as a penal theoretical problem, the arguments—both by proponents and critics of coercive treatment—become premature.

Keywords

Coercion Criminal offenders Punishment Treatment 

References

  1. Bentham, J., “Principles of Penal Law”. In The Works of Jeremy Bentham, ed. J. Bowring, Edinburgh, William Tait, (1838–1843).Google Scholar
  2. Birgden, A. and H. Cucolo, “The Treatment of Sex Offenders: Evidence, Ethics, and Human Rights”, Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, vol. 23(3) (2011) (pp. 295–313).Google Scholar
  3. Bomann-Larsen, L., “Volunatry Rehabilitation? On Neurotechnological Behavioural Treatment, Valid Consent and (In)appropriate Offers”, Neuroethics, vol. 6 2013 (pp. 65–77).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burdon, W. M. and C. A. Gallagher, “Coercion and Sex Offenders”, Criminal Justice and Behavior, vol. 29 2002 (pp. 87–109).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cherek, D. R. et al., “Effects of Chronic Paroxetine Administration on Measures of Aggressive and Impulsive Responses of Adult Males with a History of Conduct Disorder”, Psychopharmacology 159 2002 (266–274).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Day, A. et al., “Coerced Offender Rehabilitation—A Defensible Practice?”, Psychology, Crime and Law, vol. 10(3) 2004 (pp. 259–269).Google Scholar
  7. Franzini, A. et al., “Stimulation of the Posterior Hypothalamus for Medically Intractable Impulsive and Violent Behavior”, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery., vol. 83 2005.Google Scholar
  8. Hall, W. and J. Lucke, “Legally Coerced Treatment for Drug Using Offenders: Ethical and Policy Issues”, Crime and Justice Bulletin, vol. 144 2010 (pp. 1–12).Google Scholar
  9. Kagan, S., Normative Ethics, Boulder, Westview Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  10. Klag, S. et al., “The Use of Legal Coercion in the Treatment of Substance Abusers: An Overview and Critical Analysis of Thirty Years of Research”, Substance Use and Misuse, vol. 40 2005 (pp. 1777–1795).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mackie, J., Persons and Values, Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  12. MacMillan, J., “The Kindest Cut? Surgical Castration, Sex Offenders and Coercive Offers”, Journal of Medical Ethics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  13. Marlowe, D. B. “Coercive Treatment of Substance Abusing Criminal Offenders”, Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, vol. 1(1) 2001(pp. 65–73).Google Scholar
  14. Murphy, J. G., Retribution, Justice, and Therapy, Dordrecht, 1979.Google Scholar
  15. Robinson, P. H. and J. M. Darley, “Intuitions of Justice: Implications for Criminal Law and Justice Policy”, Southern California Law Review, vol. 81 2007 (pp. 1–67).Google Scholar
  16. Robinson, P. H., “The Proper Role of The Community in Determining Criminal Liability and Punishment”, in Popular Punishment, J. Ryberg and J. A. Roberts (eds.), Oxford University Press, New York (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  17. Ryberg, J., “Punishment and Desert-Adjusted Consequentialism”, in M. Tonry (ed.) Retributivism Has a PastHas it a Future?, Oxford University Press, New York, 2012.Google Scholar
  18. Ryberg, J., “Punishment, Pharmacological Treatment and Early Release”, International Journal of Applied Philosophy, vol. 26(1) 2012 (pp. 231–244).Google Scholar
  19. Seddon, T. “Coerced Drug Treatment in the Criminal Justice System: Conceptual, Ethical and Criminological Issues”, Crimonology and Criminal Justice, vol. 7(3) 2007 (pp. 269–286).Google Scholar
  20. Stevens, A. et al., “Quasi-Compulsory Treatment of Drug Dependent Offenders: An International Literature Review”, Substance Use and Misuse, vol. 40 2005 (pp. 269–283).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. UNODC, “From Coercion to Cohesion: Treating Drug Dependence Through Healthcare, not Punishment”, 2009.Google Scholar
  22. von Hirsch, A., Censure and Sanctions, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993.Google Scholar
  23. Yang, Y. and A. Raine, “Prefrontal Structural and Functional Brain Imaging Findings in Antisocial, violent, and Psychopathic individuals: A Meta-Analysis”, Psychiatry Research, vol. 174(2) (pp. 81–88).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyRoskilde UniversityRoskildeDenmark

Personalised recommendations