Criminal Law and Philosophy

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 281–287 | Cite as

Iconoclasts? Who, Us? A Reply to Dolinko

Original Paper


  1. Alexander, L. (1993). Self-defense, justification, and excuse. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 22(1), 53–66.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, L., & Ferzan, K. K. (forthcoming). Danger: The ethics of preemptive action. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, L., Ferzan, K. K., with Morse, S. J. (2009). Crime and culpability: A theory of criminal law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ashworth, A. (1988). Criminal attempt and the role of resulting harm under the code, and in the common law. Rutgers Law Journal, 19, 725–772.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, L. (1974). Criminal attempts and the theory of the law of crimes. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 3(3), 262–294.Google Scholar
  6. Dolinko, D. (2011). Review of “crime and culpability: A theory of criminal law”. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 6, 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feinberg, J. (1970). Problematic responsibility in law and morals. In Doing and deserving. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Feinberg, J. (1995). Equal punishment for failed attempts: Some bad but instructive arguments against it. Arizona Law Review, 37, 117–134.Google Scholar
  9. Hall, J. (1963). Negligent behavior should be excluded from penal liability. Columbia Law Review, 63(4), 632–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kadish, S. H. (1994). The criminal law and the luck of the draw. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 84, 679–702.Google Scholar
  11. Moore, M. S. (1997). Placing blame: A general theory of the criminal law. Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Moore, M. S., & Hurd, H. M. (2011). Punishing the awkward, the stupid, the weak, and the selfish: The culpability of negligence. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 5, 147–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schulhofer, S. J. (1974). Harm and punishment: A critique of emphasis on the results of conduct in the criminal law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 122(6), 1497–1607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Smith, J. C. (1971). The element of chance in criminal liability. Criminal Law Review, 1971, 63–75.Google Scholar
  15. Williams, G. (1961). Criminal law: The general part (2nd ed.). London: Stevens & Sons.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.San DiegoUSA
  2. 2.CamdenUSA

Personalised recommendations