Criminal Law and Philosophy

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 81–92 | Cite as

“Moore or Less” Causation and Responsibility

Reviewing Michael S. Moore, Causation and Responsibility: An Essay in Law, Morals and Metaphysics (OUP 2009)
Original Paper


  1. Alexander, L. (forthcoming). Michael Moore and the Mysteries of causation in the Law. Rutgers Law Journal, 42.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, L., Ferzan, K. K., & Morse, S. J. (2009). Crime and culpability: A theory of criminal law. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Berry v. Borough of Sugar Notch, 43 A. 240 (Pa. 1899).Google Scholar
  4. Broadbent, A. (2011). Book review. Ethics, 121, 669–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duff, R. A. (2007). Answering for crime: Responsibility and liability in criminal law. Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart.Google Scholar
  6. Hart, H. L. A., & Honore, T. (1985). Causation in the law (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Kessler, K. D. (1994). The role of luck in the criminal law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 142, 2183–2238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Moore, M. S. (1993). Foreseeing harm opaquely. In J. Gardner, et al. (Eds.), Action and value in criminal law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Moore, M. S. (forthcoming). Causation revisited. Rutgers Law Journal, 42.Google Scholar
  10. People v. Acosta, 284 Cal. Rptr. 117 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991).Google Scholar
  11. Rosen, G. (forthcoming). Causation, counterfactual dependence and culpability: Moral philosophy in Michael Moore’s causation and responsibility. Rutgers Law Journal, 42.Google Scholar
  12. Regina v. Dudley and Stephens, 14 Q.B.D. 273 (1884).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of San Diego Law SchoolSan DiegoUSA
  2. 2.Rutgers School of Law-CamdenCamdenUSA

Personalised recommendations