Criminal Law and Philosophy

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 99–105 | Cite as

Discussion (A) Deconstruction, criminalisation and the criminal law: a reply to Pavlich’s ‘The Lore of Criminal Accusation’

Original Paper

References

  1. Arendt, H. (1991). On revolution. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  2. Bauman, Z. (2002). Violence the age of uncertainty. In A. Crawford (Ed.), Crime and insecurity. The governance of safety in Europe. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Critchley, S. (1992). The ethics of deconstruction. Derrida & Levinas. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Derrida, J. (1990). ‘Force de Loi: Le ‘Fondement Mystique de l’Autorité’, Cardozo Law Review, 11(5–6), 920–1045.Google Scholar
  5. Derrida, J. (1972). Marges de la Philosophie. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  6. Derrida, J. (1987). Psychè: Inventions de l’Autre. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
  7. Duff, A. (1998). Law, language and community: some preconditions of criminal liability. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 18(2), 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s empire. London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hudson, B. (2003). Victims and offenders. In A. Von Hirsch, J. Roberts, & A. Bottoms (Eds.), Restorative justice and criminal justice. Competing or reconcilable paradigms? Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Lacey, N. (2005). Criminalisation as regulation. In Chr. Parker, C. Scott, & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Regulating law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Katholieke Unversiteit LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations