Transcranial direct current stimulation influences bilingual language control mechanism: evidence from cross-frequency coupling
- 22 Downloads
How to better suppress the interference from the non-target language when switching from one language to the other in bilingual production? The current study applied transcranial direct current stimulation over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex to modulate language control measured by cross-frequency coupling. We found that switching to L2 was more modulated by F4–F3 alpha–beta phase-amplitude compared to switching to L1 after receiving the anodal stimulation at the language task schema phase. These findings suggest that anodal stimulation affects the selection of the target language task schema by enhancing the activation of frontal areas and facilitating the coordination between the left and the right frontal hemispheres.
KeywordsLanguage control Transcranial direct current stimulation Language switching Cross-frequency coupling
This research was supported by a Grant from National Natural Science Foundation of China Youth Fund (31700991), Liaoning Natural Science Foundation of China (20170540579), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M621158), and Open Fund of Beijing Key Lab of Applied Experimental Psychology.
- Allan D (1995) Oxford placement test. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Baus C, Branzi F, Costa A (2015) On the mechanism and scope of language control in bilingual speech production. In: Cambridge handbook of bilingual processing, pp. 508–526Google Scholar
- Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodological) 57(1):289–300Google Scholar
- Blanco-Elorrieta E, Pylkkänen L (2016) Bilingual language control in perception versus action: MEG reveals comprehension control mechanisms in anterior cingulate cortex and domain-general control of production in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 36(2):290–301PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brunoni AR, Nitsche MA, Bolognini N, Bikson M, Wagner T, Merabet L, Edwards DJ, Valero-Cabre A, Rotenberg A, Pascual-Leone A, Ferrucci R (2012) Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions. Brain Stimul 5(3):175–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Keser Z, Hasan KM, Francisco GE, Yozbatiran N (2017) Effects of combined transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and robotic-assisted arm training (RAT) on the main motor, sensory and cerebellar tracts in spinal cord injury. Brain Stimul Basic Transl Clin Res Neuromodul 10(1):e10Google Scholar
- Oppenheim AV (1999) Discrete-time signal processing. Pearson Education India, BengaluruGoogle Scholar
- Zhang QF, Yang YF (2003) The determiners of picture naming latency. Acta Psychol Sin 35(4):447–454Google Scholar