Theoretical models of reaction times arising from simple-choice tasks
In this work we present a group of theoretical models for reaction times arising from simple-choice task tests. In particular, we argue for the inclusion of a shifted version of the Gamma distribution as a theoretical model based on a mathematical result on first hitting times. We contrast the goodness-of-fit of those models with the Ex-Gaussian distribution, using data from recently published experiments. The evidence of the results obtained highlights the convenience of proposing theoretical models for reaction times instead of models acting exclusively as quantitative distribution measurements.
KeywordsCognitive process Reaction times Quantitative distribution measurements Theoretical models Simple-choice task tests
This work is supported by funding from Project FONDECYT 1161023. We thank Carlos Velasco and David C. Osmon for providing us with the data sets featured here. The authors thank Professor Jeff Miller for assisting in clarifying definitions of simple-choice and 2AFC tasks. We also thank Nathan Leigh Jones and Amy K. Robinson for proofreading this manuscript. The authors acknowledge the unknown referees for their insightful suggestions.
- Donkin C, Brown S (2018) Response times and decision-making. In: Wixted JT (ed) Steven’s handbook of experimental psychology and cognitive science. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
- Massaro DW (1989) Experimental psychology: an information processing approach. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- Palmer EM, Horowitz Todd S, Torralba A, Wolfe JM (2011) What are the shapes of response time distributions in visual search? J Exp Psychol 37(1):58Google Scholar
- Rousselet G, Wilcox R (2018) Reaction times and other skewed distributions: problems with the mean and the median. bioRxiv preprint first posted online Aug. 2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1101/383935
- Wichmann F, Jäkel F (2018) Methods in psychophysics. In: Wixted JT (ed) Steven’s handbook of experimental psychology and cognitive science. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
- Woods DL, Wyma JM, Yund EW, Herron TJ, Reed B (2015) Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time. Front Human Neurosci 9:131Google Scholar