Topography, independent component analysis and dipole source analysis of movement related potentials
- 209 Downloads
The objective of this study was to test, in single subjects, the hypothesis that the signs of voluntary movement-related neural activity would first appear in the prefrontal region, then move to both the medial frontal and posterior parietal regions, progress to the medial primary motor area, lateralize to the contralateral primary motor area and finally involve the cerebellum (where feedback-initiated error signals are computed). Six subjects performed voluntary finger movements while DC coupled EEG was recorded from 64 scalp electrodes. Event-related potentials (ERPs) averaged on the movements were analysed both before and after independent component analysis (ICA) combined with dipole source analysis (DSA) of the independent components. Both a simple topographic analysis of undecomposed ERPs and the ICA/DSA analysis suggested that the original hypothesis was inadequate. The major departure from its predictions was that, while activity over many brain regions did appear at the expected times, it also appeared at unexpected times. Overall, the results suggest that the neuroscientific ‘standard model’, in which neural activity occurs sequentially in a series of discrete local areas each specialized for a particular function, may reflect the true situation less well than models in which large areas of brain shift simultaneously into and out of common activity states.
KeywordsBereitschaftspotential Readiness Potential Motor Related Cortical Potential Independent Component Analysis Dipole Source Analysis Scale-free Small-world
Thanks to Professor Robert T. Knight for access to hardware, Clay Clayworth for help setting it up and Christina Karns for assistance with stimulus software. Thanks also to Associate Professor Gary Bold for support during the analysis phase of the project.
- Bell AJ, Sejnowsky TJ (1995) An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comp 7:1129–1159Google Scholar
- Damasio AR, Tranel D, Damasio H (1991) Somatic markers and the guidance of behavior: theory and preliminary testing. In: Levin HS, Eisenberg HM, Benton AL (eds) Frontal lobe function and dysfunction. Oxford UP, New York, pp 217–229Google Scholar
- Freeman WJ (2007) Scale-free neocortical dynamics. Scholarpedia pp 8780Google Scholar
- Hilgetag CC, Burns GAPC, O’Neill MA, Scannell JW (2000) Anatomical connectivity defines the organization of clusters of cortical areas in the macaque and the cat. Phil Trans Roy Soc B 273:503–511Google Scholar
- Jensen HJ (1998) Self-organized criticality: emergent behavior in physical and biological systems. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Kornhuber HH, Deecke L (1964) Hirnpotentialänderungen beim Menschen vor und nach Willkürbewegungen, dargestellt mit Magnetbandspeicherung und Rückwärtsanalyse. Pflügers Arch ges Physiol 281:52Google Scholar
- Makeig S et al (2002) Frequently asked questions about ICA applied to EEG and MEG data. WWW Site, Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, http://sccn.ucsd.edu/%7Escott/tutorial/icafaq.html
- Pockett S (2006) The neuroscience of movement. In: Pockett S, Banks WP, Gallagher S (eds) Does consciousness cause behavior? MIT Press, Cambridge MassGoogle Scholar