Advertisement

NanoEthics

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 103–112 | Cite as

From “Safe by Design” to Scientific Changes: Unforeseen Effects of Controversy Surrounding Nanotechnology in France

  • Marie-Gabrielle SuraudEmail author
Original Research Paper
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Based on fieldwork, this article highlights the unexpected effects of controversies about nanotechnology in France. These controversies stem in particular from a strong challenge to the field by civil society protests and criticism concerning environmental and health risks. One reason for this challenge is the specific difficulties in assessing the toxicity and ecotoxicity of nanomaterials. Civil society organizations have pushed for strictly controlling or stopping academic, industrial, or even basic research. They were not successful in this regard but their activities prompted researchers to think about “safe by design” solutions and this led to new interdisciplinary cooperation. Furthermore, the uncertainty about the risks assessment resulted in a reconfiguration of the relationship between academic research and industrial companies. Researchers have become essential to the shaping of safe products. The risks of nanomaterials have thus been a driving force for new research and innovation practices.

Keywords

Nanotechnology Nanomaterials Risks Safe by design Research Controversies 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments which helped be to improve this text.

References

  1. 1.
    Kelty C (2009) Beyond implications and applications: the story of ‘safety by design’. NanoEthics 3(2):79–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johansson M, Boholm Å (2017) Scientists’ understandings of risk of nanomaterials: disciplinary culture through the ethnographic lens. Nanoethics 11(3):229–242.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-017-0297-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schwarz-Plaschg C, Kallhoff A, Eisenberger I (2017) Making nanomaterials safer by design? NanoEthics 11(3):277–281.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-017-0307-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang X (2015) Revisiting upstream public engagement: from a Habermasian perspective. NanoEthics 10(1):63–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Suraud MG, Barrey S, Chaskiel P, Crivellari P, Debailly R, Morena E, Pucheu E (2011) Les nanoactivités à l’épreuve de leur légitimation. Research report, Programme REPERE, Ministère de l’Ecologie, du Développement Durable, des transports et du logement and ANR Nano-InnovGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    ANSES (2014) Évaluation des risques liés aux nanomatériaux. Enjeux et mise à jour des connaissances. Rapport d’expertise collective, https://www.anses.fr/en/system/files/AP2012sa0273Ra.pdf. Accessed 13 July 2019
  7. 7.
    Van de Poel I, Robaey Z (2017) Safe-by-design: from safety to responsibility. Nanoethics 11(3):297–306.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-017-0301-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (eds) (2002) Converging technologies for improving human performance. Nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. National Science Foundation, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vinck D, Hubert M (2017) Nanotechnologies, l’invisible révolution - Au-delà des idées reçues, 2nd edn. Le Cavalier Bleu, ParisGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Laurent B (2013) Les espaces politiques des substances chimiques. Définir des nanomatériaux internationaux, européens et français. Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances 7(19):195–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chateauraynaud F (2005) Nanosciences et technoprophéties. Le nanomonde dans la matrice des futurs. 30 avril, http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/11/19/98/PDF/nanotechnos_FC.pdf. Accessed 13 July 2019
  12. 12.
    Chateauraynaud F, Doury M, Trabal P (2012) Chimères, promesses et prophéties dans les controverses autour des nanosciences et des nanotechnologies. Journées nationales nanosciences et nanotechnologies, 7–9 Novembre, BordeauxGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Suraud MG (2014) L’espace public des risques; Concertation et communication. Revue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication 4/2014. URL: http://rfsic.revues.org/883. Accessed 13 July 2019
  14. 14.
    Chaskiel P (2013) Syndicalisme et nanotechnologies. De l’espace des relations professionnelles à l’espace public des risques. Sociologie du travail 55(4):474–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    DGCIS (2012) Les réalités industrielles dans le domaine des nanomatériaux en France. Analyse du poids des nanomatériaux dans la filière industrielle concernée. http://www.entreprises.gouv.fr/files/files/guides/realites-industrielles-nanomateriaux-france.pdf. Accessed 13 July 2019
  16. 16.
    Cao C, Appelbaum R, Parker R (2013) Research is high and the market is far away: commercialization of nanotechnology in China. Technol Soc 35(1):55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chaskiel P, Suraud MG (2014) Nanotechnologies, l’espace civique des risques redimensionnés. Nature, Sciences et Société, 22:93–102Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Suraud MG (2013) La contestation des nanos: redéfinir la notion de politisation de la science. Les Enjeux de l’Information et de la Communication, http://w3.u-grenoble3.fr/les_enjeux/2013/09Suraud. Accessed 13 July 2019
  19. 19.
    Camguilhem S (2015) La constitution de l’ITAV en Midi-Pyrénées: les nanobiotechnologies comme levier de la transformation de la recherche publique. Thèse de doctorat, Université de ToulouseGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    De Kerorguen Y (2006) Les nanotechnologies, espoir, menace ou mirage? Editions Lignes de Repères, ParisGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jouvenet M (2012) Nanosciences et nanotechnologies: une coopération modèle? Terrain 58 (March). URL: http://journals.openedition.org/terrain/14645. Accessed 13 July 2019;  https://doi.org/10.4000/field.14645

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CERTOP-CNRS (Centre d’Etude et de Recherche Travail, Organisation, Pouvoir)University Paul Sabatier-Toulouse 3Toulouse CEDEX 4France

Personalised recommendations