Advertisement

NanoEthics

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 303–306 | Cite as

Ethical Issues in Cyborg Technology: Diversity and Inclusion

  • Enno Park
Critical Discussion Notes

Abstract

Progress has reached the point where cyborg technology is leaving the sphere of mere science fiction. Whereas society as a whole formed a symbiosis with technology long ago, individuals are now starting to merge with technology as well. The effects can already be studied by looking at the examples of smartphones, computers and the Internet. The idea of ‘repairing’ humans, medical implants more sensitive than our natural, human faculties and even non-medical implants raise a lot of ethical questions, and require the concept of inclusion to be re-thought.

Keywords

Transhumanism Cyborg Posthumanism Disability Inclusion Normalisation Body enhancement Body hacking Body modification Human enhancement Cochlea implant Open source Hacktivism Implants Protheses Ethics Naturalism Social determinism Biomedical systems 

References

  1. 1.
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (2011): Cochlear Implants, NIH Publication No. 11–4798, updated MarchGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clynes, Manfred E. and Kline, Nathan S. (1960)‘Cyborgs and Space’, Astronautics (September)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cf. Haraway, Donna: ‘A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century’, in Haraway, Donna: Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhiguang Zhu, Tsz Kin Tam, Fangfang Sun, Chun You, Zhang, Y.-H. Percival (2014): ‘A high-energy-density sugar biobattery based on a synthetic enzymatic pathway’, Nature Communications 5 http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2014/140121/ncomms4026/full/ncomms4026.html#figures
  5. 5.
    Galan F, Nuttin M, Lew E, Ferrez PW, Vanacker G, Philips J, Millan J, Del R (2008) ‘A brain-actuated wheelchair: asynchronous and non-invasive brain-computer interfaces for continuous control of robots’. Clin Neurophysiol 119:2159–2169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haraway D (1988) Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial Perspective’. Fem Stud 14(3):575–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gillette, Felix (2004): ‘Racing tall: A Paralympian stands accused of getting an illegal leg up’, Slate, 10 November 2004Google Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Cf. Ladd, Paddy: ‘Deaf culture’, Multilingual Matters, 2003Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sturley, Nick (2010): ‘Eight Resolutions’, milan1880.com, http://milan1880.com/milan1880congress/eightresolutions.html
  11. 11.
    Cf. Heffley, Holly: ‘Pediatric Cochlear Implants: Medical Miracle or Cultural Genocide?’, University of Kansas School of Nursing, http://archie.kumc.edu/bitstream/handle/2271/848/STT-JUNW_2010_Heffley_Pediatric-Cochlear-Implants.pdf?sequence=1

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cyborgs e. V.BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations