Advertisement

NanoEthics

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 153–170 | Cite as

The Narratology of Lay Ethics

  • Jean-Pierre DupuyEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The five narratives identified by the DEEPEN-project are interpreted in terms of the ancient story of desire, evil, and the sacred, and the modern narratives of alienation and exploitation. The first three narratives of lay ethics do not take stock of what has radically changed in the modern world under the triple and joint evolution of science, religion, and philosophy. The modern narratives, in turn, are in serious need of a post-modern deconstruction. Both critiques express the limits of humanism. They do not imply, however, that these narratives should not be taken seriously. In particular, the enduring presence of three ancient narratives in laypeople’s symbolic thought is highly significant in terms of the role that the logic of the sacred keeps playing in the workings of modern societies. Lay people’s implicit understanding of how modern technology tends towards catastrophe and apocalypse provides the strongest argument for taking these narratives seriously.

Keywords

Lay ethics Narrative Nanotechnology Catastrophism Violence and the Sacred 

Notes

Acknowledgement

I am deeply grateful to Alfred Nordmann who accepted to shorten significantly a previous version of my text for the sake of this publication, and who managed to do so while preserving the full meaning of my analysis.

References

  1. 1.
    Anders G (1982) Hiroshima ist überall. C. H. Beck, MunichGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anders G (1991) Die atomare Drohung: Radikale Überlegungen. C. H. Beck, MunichGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arendt H (1958) The human condition. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arendt H (1991) On revolution. Penguin Classics, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arthur WB (1988) Competing technologies: an overview. In: Dosi R et al (eds) Technical change and economic theory. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Atlan H (1999) Les Etincelles de hasard. Tome 1: Connaissance spermatique. Seuil, ParisGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ball P (2007) Meanings of ‘life’: synthetic biology provides a welcome antidote to chronic vitalism. Nature 447:1031–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bénichou P (1948) Morales du Grand Siècle. Gallimard, ParisGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bloch E (1986) The principle of hope. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Broderick D (2001) The spike: how our lives are being transformed by rapidly advancing technologies. Forge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brodie B (1973) War and politics. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cayley D (ed) (2005) The rivers north of the future: the testament of Ivan Illich. House of Anansi, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Christ R (1969) The narrow act: Borges’ art of allusion. New York University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Crisp R, Slote M (eds) (1996) Virtue ethics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Davies S, Macnaghten P (2010) Narratives of mastery and resistance: lay ethics of nanotechnology. NanoEthics 4:2, doi: 10.1007/s11569-010-0096-5
  16. 16.
    Davies S, Kearnes M, Macnaghten P (2009) All things weird and scary: nanotechnology, theology and cultural resources. Cult Relig Interdiscip J 10(2):201–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dupuy J-P (1992) Le sacrifice et l’envie: Le libéralisme aux prises avec la justice sociale. Calmann-Lévy, ParisGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dupuy J-P (2002) Pour un catastrophisme éclairé. Seuil, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dupuy J-P (2006) Retour de Tchernobyl: Journal d’un homme en colère. Seuil, ParisGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dupuy J-P (2007) Some pitfalls in the philosophical foundations of nanoethics. In: Khushf G (ed) Special issue on the NBIC convergence. J Med Philos 32:237–261Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dupuy J-P (2009) La marque du sacré. Carnets Nord, ParisGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dupuy J-P (2009) On the origins of cognitive science. MIT, BostonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fan H et al (2007) Modulus density scaling behaviour and framework architecture of nanoporous self-assembled silicas. Nat Mater 6:418–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Girard R (1965) Deceit, desire, and the novel. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Girard R (1977) Violence and the sacred. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Girard R (1986) The scapegoat. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Girard R (1987) Things hidden since the foundation of the world. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grimm J, Grimm W (2008) The classical works of the Brothers Grimm. Jerome PaulGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hayek F (1944) The road to Serfdom. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hayek F (1988) The fatal conceit: the errors of socialism. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Heidegger M (1966) Nur ein Gott kann uns noch retten. Der Spiegel 23 1976, 213Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Heidegger M (1977) Letter on humanism. In: Krell DF (ed) M. Heidegger Basic writings. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Heller A (2006) European master-narratives about freedom. In: Delanty G (ed) Handbook of European social theory. Routledge, London, pp 257–265Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jonas H (1984) The imperative of responsibility: in search of ethics for the technological age. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kavka G (1987) Moral paradoxes of nuclear deterrence. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kelly K (2010) Will spiritual robots replace humanity by 2100? In: Kelly K (ed) What technology wants. Viking, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kubrick S (1964) Dr. Strangelove or: how I learned to stop worrying and love the bomb. Columbia Pictures, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lévi-Strauss C (1969) The raw and the cooked. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lévi-Strauss C (1973) From honey to ashes. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lévi-Strauss C (1978) The origin of table manners. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lévi-Strauss C (1981) The naked man. Jonathan Cape, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lewis DK (1981) Finite counterforce. In: Shue H (ed) Nuclear deterrence and moral restraint. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lumet S (1964) Fail-Safe. Columbia Pictures, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Molière (1998) Dom Juan. Flammarion, ParisGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Neiman S (2002) Evil in modern thought. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rachels J (ed) (1998) Ethical Theory 2, theories about how we should live. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Schelling T (1960) The strategy of conflict. Harvard University Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Schwarz A, Nordmann A (2010) The political economy of technoscience. In: Carrier M, Nordmann A (eds) Science in the context of application. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Valéry P (1910) Cahier B. NRF, ParisGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Velleman JD (1991) Well-being and time. Pac Philos Q 72:48–77Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Velleman JD (2003) Narrative explanation. Philos Rev 112:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    von Trier L (1996) Breaking the waves. Zentropa, HvidovreGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy and Literature GroupStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations