NanoEthics

, 3:185

Moral Imagination, Trading Zones, and the Role of the Ethicist in Nanotechnology

  • Michael E. Gorman
  • Patricia H. Werhane
  • Nathan Swami
Original Paper

Abstract

The societal and ethical impacts of emerging technological and business systems cannot entirely be foreseen; therefore, management of these innovations will require at least some ethicists to work closely with researchers. This is particularly critical in the development of new systems because the maximum degrees of freedom for changing technological direction occurs at or just after the point of breakthrough; that is also the point where the long-term implications are hardest to visualize. Recent work on shared expertise in Science & Technology Studies (STS) can help create productive collaborations among scientists, engineers, ethicists and other stakeholders as these new systems are designed and implemented. But collaboration across these disciplines will be successful only if scientists, engineers, and ethicists can communicate meaningfully with each other. The establishment of a trading zone coupled with moral imagination present one method for such collaborative communication.

Keywords

Nanotechnology Moral imagination Mental models Interdisciplinary collaboration Trading zones Interactional expertise 

References

  1. 1.
    Berne R (2005) Nanotalk: Conversations with scientists and engineers about ethics, meaning, and belief in the development of nanotechnogy. Erlbaum, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Collins H (2004) Gravity’s shadow: The search for gravitational waves. University of Chicago Press, Chicago xxiii, 870, [16] of platesGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Collins HM, Evans R, Gorman M (2007) Trading zones and interactional expertise. Stud Hist Phil Sci 38(4):657–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Collins HM, Evans R (2002) The third wave of science studies. Soc Stud Sci 32(2):235–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Conant J (2002) Tuxedo Park: A Wall Street tycoon and the secret palace of science that changed the course of World War II. Simon & Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ebbesen M, Andersen S, Besenbacher F (2006) Ethics in nanotechnology: starting from scratch? Bulletin of science. Technol Soc 26(6):451–464Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fisher E (2007) Ethnographic invention: probing the capacity of laboratory decisions. NanoEthics 1(2):155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Galison P (1997) Image & logic: A material culture of microphysics. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Galison P (2009) Trading with the enemy. In: Gorman ME (ed) Trading zones and interactional expertise: Creating new kinds of collaboration. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Geertz C (1983) Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gentner D, Whitley EW (1997) Mental models of population growth. In: Bazerman MH, Messick DM, Tenbrunsel AE, Wade-Benzoni KA (eds) Environment, ethics and behavior. New Lexington, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gorman ME (1997) Mind in the world: cognition and practice in the invention of the telephone. Soc Stud Sci 27(4):583–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gorman ME (1981) Pre-war conformity research in social psychology: the approaches of Floyd H. Allport and Muzafer Sherif. J Hist Behav Sci 17:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gorman ME (1998) Transforming nature: Ethics, invention and design. Kluwer Academic, BostonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gorman ME et al (2008) A framework for using nanotechnology to improve water quality. In: Savage N et al (eds) Nanotechnology applications: Solutions for improving water quality. William Andrew, Applied Science, NorwichGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gorman ME, Groves JF, Shrager J (2004b) Societal dimensions of nanotechnology as a trading zone: Results from a pilot project. In: Baird D, Nordmann A, Schummer J (eds) Discovering the nanoscale. IOS, Amsterdam, pp 63–73Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gorman ME, Groves JF, Catalano RK (2004a) Societal dimensions of nanotechnology. IEEE Technol Soc Mag 29(4):55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gorman M, Hertz M, Louis G, Magpili L, Mauss M, Mehalik M et al (2000) Integrating ethics & engineering: a graduate option in systems engineering, ethics, and technology studies. J Eng Educ 89(4):461–470Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Helmke BP, Thakker DB, Goldman RD, Davies PF (2001) Spatiotemporal analysis of flow-induced intermediate filament displacement in living endothelial cells. Biophysics Journal 80:184–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hutchins E (1983) Understanding micronesian navigation. In: Gentner D, Stevens AL (eds) Mental models. Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Holton G (1973) Thematic origins of scientific thought. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Johnson DG (2007) Ethics and technology ‘in the making’: An essay on the challenge of Nanoethics. Nanoethics 1(1)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Johnson M (1993) Moral imagination. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Johnson-Laird PN (1983) Mental models. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khushf G (2003) The ethics of nanotechnology: Vision and values for a new generation of science and engineering. In: Johnson D et al (eds) Emerging technologies and ethical issues in engineering. National Academies, Washington, pp 29–55Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kuhn TS (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Latour B, Woolgar S (1986) Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nair LS, Laurencin CT (2007) Silver nanoparticles: synthesis and therapeutic applications. Nanotech 2007(3):301–316Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Norman DA (1983) Some observations on mental models. In: Gentner D, Stevens AL (eds) Mental models. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 7–14Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    van de Poel I (2008) How should we do nanoethics? A network approach for discerning ethical issues in nanotechnology. NanoEthics 2:25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (eds) (2002) Converging technologies for improving human performance: Nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Senge P (1990) The fifth discipline: The art & practice of learning organizations. Currency Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sherif CW (1976) Orientation in social psychology. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tian J, Wong KKY, Ho C, Lok C, Yu W, Che C, Chiu J, Tam PKH (2007) Topical delivery of silver nanoparticles promotes wound healing. Chem Med Chem 2:129–136Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Van de Belt H, Neut D, Schenk W, van Horn JR, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ (2001) Infection of orthopedic implants and the use of antibiotic-loaded bone cements: a review. Acta Orthopaedica 72:557–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Werhane PH (1999) Moral imagination and management decision making. In: Freeman RE (ed) The Ruffin series in business ethics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zwart SD, van de Poel I, Mit H, Brumsen M (2006) A network approach for distinguishing ethical issues in research and development. Sci Eng Ethics 12:663–684Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fisher E, Mahajan R (2009) Embedding the humanities in engineering: Art, dialogue, and a laboratory. In: ME Gorman (ed) Trading zones and interactional expertise: Creating new kinds of collaboration. MITGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael E. Gorman
    • 1
  • Patricia H. Werhane
    • 2
  • Nathan Swami
    • 3
  1. 1.Science, Technology & Society, School of Engineering and Applied ScienceUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Institute for Business and Professional EthicsDePaul UniversityChicagoUSA
  3. 3.School of Engineering and Applied ScienceUniversity of VirginiaThornton Hall, CharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations