Abstract
The current literature on nanoethics focuses on a wide array of topics such as equity, privacy, military, environment, human enhancement, intellectual property, and security. The identification of those topics leads to the adoption of an ethical stance, which we call the in itself dimension. In this article we argue that even though it is correct to identify the areas where ethical problems are imperative to deal with (in itself dimension), it is a partial approach. This is because the in itself dimension pays no attention to another ethical stance; one that does not have anything to do with individual or collective responsibilities, but rather with the socio-economic system into which those responsibilities are embedded. We call this second issue the contextual dimension.
References
Bayer (2007) bayer position on nanotechnology. Retrieved August 20, 2008, from http://www.sustainability2007.bayer.com/en/Bayer-Position-on-Nanotechnology.pdf
Científica (2008) The nanotechnology opportunity report. 3rd Edition. Retrieved February 16, 2009, from http://cientifica.eu/index.php?option=com_virtuemart&page=shop.product_details&flypage=shop.flypage&product_id=34
Continental Western Insurance Group (2008) Nanotubes and nanotechnology exclusion. [Policy CW 33 69 06 08]
CTA (International Center for Technology Assessment) (2007) Broad international coalition issues principles for strong oversight of nanotechnology. Retrieved March 20, 2008, from http://www.icta.org/press/release.cfm?news_id=26
DuPont & Environmental Defense Fund (2007). Nano risk framework executive summary. dupont & environmental defense fund. Retrieved March 22, 2008, from http://www.nanoriskframework.com/content.cfm?contentID=6498
Ebbesen M, Andersen S, Besenbacher F (2006) Ethics in nanotechnology: starting from scratch? Bull Sci Technol Soc 26:451. doi:10.1177/0270467606295003
Group ETC (2005) Nanotech’s “second nature” patents: implications for the global south. March/April and May/June-2005. Communiqués No. 87 and 88. Retrieved September 1, 2006, from http://www.etcgroup.org/documents/Com8788SpecialPNanoMar-Jun05ENG.pdf.
Group ETC (2003) The big down: atomtech—technologies converging at the nano-scale. Retrieved July 27, 2006, from http://www.etcgroup.org/article.asp?newsid=375
ETUC (2008) ETUC resolution on nanotechnology and nanomateriales. Retrieved, June 26, 2008, from http://www.etuc.org/IMG/pdf_ETUC_resolution_on_nano_-_EN_-_25_June_08.pdf
FoE – A. (Friends of Earth – Australia) (2006) Nanomaterials, sunscreens and cosmetics: small ingredients big risks. FoE. Retrieved March 20, 2008, from http://nano.foe.org.au/node/125
FoE (Friends of Earth) (2008) Out of the laboratory and into the food chain: Nanotechnology in food and agriculture. Friends of Earth-Australia. Retrieved March 21, 2008, from http://nano.foe.org.au/node/220
Foladori G (2003) La privatización de la salud: el caso de la industria farmacéutica. Rev Int Sociol 34:33–64
Harper T (2008) Nanotechnologies in 2009. Creative destruction or credit crunch? White paper. Científica Ltd. Retrieved February 16, 2009, from http://www.cientifica.eu/files/Whitepapers/Nanotechnologies%20in%202009.pdf
IEHN (The Investor Environmental Health Network) (2008) Toxic stock syndrome: how corporate financial reports fail to apprise investors of the risks of product recalls and toxic liabilities. The investor environmental health network. [Lewis, Sanford; Liroff, Richard; Byrne, Margaret; Booth, Mary S.; Baue, Bill]. Retrieved May 3, 2008, from http://iehn.org/documents/IEHN%20Toxic%20Stock%20Report%203-08.pdf
Invernizzi N, Foladori G (2005) Nanotechnology and the developing world. Will nanotechnology overcome poverty or widen disparities. Nanotechnology Law Bus J 2(3):1–9
IUF (International Union of Food and Agricultural Workers) (2007) The IUF resolution. Retrieved March 20, 2007, from http://www.rel-uita.org/nanotecnologia/resolucion_uita_nano_eng.htm
Johnson D (2007) Ethics and technology ‘in the making’: an essay on the challenge of nanoethics. NanoEthics 1:21–30. doi:10.1007/s11569-007-0006-7
Juma C, Yee-Cheong L (coord.). Innovation: applying knowledge in development. London, Sterling, Va.: Earthscan, Millennium Project, 2005. www.unmillenniumproject.org/documents/Science-complete.pdf Retrieved September 13, 2005
Lewenstein BV (2005) What counts as a ‘social and ethical issue’ in nanotechnology? HYLE Int J Philos Chem 11(1):5–18
Mnyusiwalla A, Daar AS, Singer PA (2003) ‘Mind the gap’: science and ethics in nanotechnology. Nanotechnology 14:R9–R13. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/14/3/201
Moor J, Weckert J (2004) Nanoethics: assessing the nanoscale from na ethical point of view. In: Baird D, Normdann A, Chummer J (eds) Discovering the Nanoscale. IOS, Amsterdam
Robinson WL (2004) Nano-Ethics. In: Baird D, Nordmann A, Schummer J (eds) Discovering the Nanoscale. IOS, Amsterdam, p 299
Rusnano (Russian Corporation of Nanotechnology) (2008) Certification. Retrieved October 28, 2008, from http://en.rusnano.com/Rubric.aspx?RubricId=412
Salamanca-Buentello F, Persad DL, Court EB, Martin DK, Daar AS, Singer P (2005) Nanotechnology and the developing world. PLoS Med 2(5). http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020097. Accessed May 20, 2005. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020097
Swiss Reinsurance Company (2004) Nanotechnology. Small matter, many unknowns. Retrieved May 3, 2008, from http://www.swissre.com/resources/31598080455c7a3fb154bb80a45d76a0-Publ04_Nano_en.pdf
The Swiss Retailer’s Organisation & Innovation Society (2008). Code of conduct. Retrieved April 24, 2008, from http://www.innovationsgesellschaft.ch/media/archive2/publikationen/Factsheet_CoC_engl.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Foladori, G., Invernizzi, N. & Záyago, E. Two Dimensions of the Ethical Problems Related to Nanotechnology. Nanoethics 3, 121–127 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-009-0060-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-009-0060-4