Contemporary Islam

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 35–52 | Cite as

Manufacturing halal in Malaysia

  • Johan FischerEmail author


In Arabic, halal literally means ‘permissible’ or ‘lawful’. Halal is no longer an expression of an esoteric form of production, trade and consumption, but part of a huge and expanding globalized market in which certification, standards and technoscience play important roles. Over the past three decades, Malaysia has become a world leader in the global expansion of halal markets. This has come about in large part because the state and government of Malaysia have taken on the role of halal-certifying authority within the country. In effect, it has certified, standardized and bureaucratized halal production, trade and consumption. Based on fieldwork in Malaysia, this article explores how manufacturing companies understand and practise halal certification, standards and technoscience. I argue that while existing studies of halal overwhelmingly explore micro-social aspects such as the everyday consumption among Muslim groups, ‘the bigger institutional picture’ that frames such consumption production and regulation are not well understood. By studying halal production, I provide an ethnography of the overlapping technologies and techniques of production and regulation that together warrant a product as ‘halal’ and thereby help to format the market.


Malaysia Halal Certification Standards Technoscience Manufacturers 


  1. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. (2011). Global halal food market. Ottawa: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.Google Scholar
  2. Atighetchi, D. (2007). Islamic bioethics: problems and perspectives. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brunsson, N., & Jakobsson, B. (2000). The contemporary expansion of standardization. In N. Brunsson & B. Jakobsson (Eds.), A world of standards (pp. 1–20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cobett, E. (2011). The shaping of Islamic finance in South Africa: public Islam and Muslim publics. Journal for Islamic Studies, 31, 29–59.Google Scholar
  5. Denny, F. M. (2006). An introduction to Islam. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Fischer, J. (2008). Proper Islamic consumption: Shopping among the Malays in modern Malaysia. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies Press.Google Scholar
  7. Fischer, J. (2011). The halal frontier: Muslim consumers in a globalized market. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Funston, J. (2006). Malaysia. In G. Fealy & V. Hooker (Eds.), Voices of Islam in Southeast Asia: a contemporary sourcebook (pp. 51–61). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  9. Furlow, C. A. (2009). Malaysian modernities: cultural politics and the construction of Muslim technoscientific identities. Anthropological Quarterly, 82(1), 197–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Furlow, C. (2013). Secularism in Malaysia. In R. Ghosh (Ed.), Making sense of the secular: critical perspectives from Europe and Asia (pp. 171–181). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Gellner, D. N., & Hirsch, E. (2001). Introduction: Ethnography of organizations and organizations of ethnography. In D. N. Gellner & E. Hirsch (Eds.), Inside organizations: anthropologists at work (pp. 1–18). Oxford and New York: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Gomez, E. T. (2012). The politics and policies of corporate development: race, rents and distribution in Malaysia. In H. Hill, T. Yean, S. Tham, & R. H. M. Zin (Eds.), Malaysia’s development challenges: Graduating from the middle (pp. pp. 63–82)). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Henderson, J. C. (2003). Managing tourism and Islam in peninsular Malaysia. Tourism Management, 24(4), 447–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoodbhoy, P. (1991). Islam and science: religious orthodoxy and the struggle for rationality. London: Zed.Google Scholar
  15. Iqbal, M. (Ed.). (2012). Islam and science: historic and contemporary perspectives. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  16. Jomo, K. S., & Cheek, A. S. (1992). Malaysia’s Islamic movements. In J. S. Kahn & F. L. K. Wah (Eds.), Fragmented vision: culture and politics in contemporary Malaysia (pp. 162–193). North Sydney: Asian Studies Association of Australia in association with Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  17. Kipnis, A. (2008). Audit cultures: neoliberal governmentality, socialist legacy or technologies of governing. American Ethnologist, 35(2), 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liow, J. C. (2009). Piety and politics: Islamism in contemporary Malaysia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lotfalian, M. (2004). Islam, technoscientific identities, and the culture of curiosity. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  20. Maurer, B. (2002). Anthropological and accounting knowledge in Islamic banking and finance: rethinking critical accounts. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 8(4), 645–667.Google Scholar
  21. Maurer, B. (2005). Mutual life, limited. Islamic banking, alternative currencies, lateral reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mazzarella, W. (2003). Shoveling smoke: advertising and globalization in contemporary India. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mitchell, M. (1998). Employing qualitative methods in the private sector. Qualitative research methods series 42. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Miyazaki, H. (2013). Arbitraging Japan: dreams of capitalism at the end of finance. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Nagata, J. (1994). How to be Islamic without being an Islamic state. In A. S. Ahmed & D. Hastings (Eds.), Islam, globalization and postmodernity (pp. 63–90). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. New Straits Times 11 January (2001). Ajinomoto reassures Muslims its product is halalGoogle Scholar
  27. New Straits Times 12 April (2001). Ajinomoto is ‘halal’.Google Scholar
  28. New Straits Times 6 January (2001). Malaysian Ajinomoto is halal, says JAKIM.Google Scholar
  29. New Straits Times 9 January (2001). ‘Conduct tests to confirm Ajinomoto is halal’Google Scholar
  30. Ong, A., & Collier, S. J. (2005). Global assemblages, anthropological problems. In A. Ong & S. J. Collier (Eds.), Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems (pp. 3–21). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  31. Peletz, M. G. (2002). Islamic modern: religious courts and cultural politics in Malaysia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Power, M. (1999). The audit society: rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Riaz, M. N., & Chaudry, M. M. (2004). Halal food production. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  34. Rudnyckyj, D. (2010). Spiritual economies: Islam, globalization and the afterlife of development. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Simoons, F. J. (1994). Eat not this flesh: food avoidances from prehistory to the present. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  36. Strathern, M. (2000). Introduction: new accountabilities. In M. Strathern (Ed.), Audit cultures: anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy (pp. 1–18). London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thompson, E. C. (2003). Malay male migrants: negotiating contested identities in Malaysia. American Ethnologist, 30(3), 418–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Urciuoli, B. (2008). Skills and selves in the new workplace. American Ethnologist, 35(21), 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilk, R. (2006). Home cooking in the global village: Caribbean food from buccaneers to ecotourists. Oxford and New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  40. Williamson, T. (2002). Incorporating a Malaysian nation. Cultural Anthropology, 17(3), 401–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Society and GlobalisationRoskilde UniversityRoskildeDenmark

Personalised recommendations