Advertisement

Contemporary Islam

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 117–138 | Cite as

Gender and sexuality online on Australian Muslim forums

  • Roxanne D. MarcotteEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper examines the e-religious discourse that Australian Muslims produce on the internet. The study of two online discussions on MuslimVillage forums—one of Australia’s largest online Muslim communities—about polygamy and homosexuality will illustrate how online interaction within virtual Islamic environments provides both greater and lesser fluidity to e-Islamic normative discourses associated with gender and sexuality. Muslim forums provide opportunities for members to display a variety of views and opinions: on the one hand, they allow Muslims to post views that may challenge, contest, or even transgress Islamic gender and sexuality norms, while equally allowing members, on the other hand, to reaffirm more authoritative normative Islamic views. The various voices that inhabit Australia’s Islamicyberspace’s new Muslim social and networked environments thus need to negotiate virtual normative representations.

Keywords

Internet Forums Gender Polygamy Homosexuality Australia 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank both the Centre for Critical and Cultural Studies, University of Queensland, and its director, Professor Graeme Turner, for the Faculty Visiting Fellowship (fall 2007) I received for the project “Prescription, Construction, and Contestation of Selves, Identities, and Representations of Muslim Women in Cyberspace” and Dr. Juliane Hammer, Visiting Professor at Princeton University who, together with Professor Cemil Aydın (also Visiting Professor at Princeton University), organized a very successful 2 day workshop entitled “Muslims and Media: Representation, Discourse, and Participation,” held at Princeton University (USA), May 1–2, 2008; they and the other participants of the workshop were most forthcoming with encouragements and feedback.41 I would also like to thank the Department of Religious Studies of Seoul National University, for their invitation to present part of this research at a departmental seminar on October 2, 2008, and which I subsequently presented at a seminar for the Centre for Critical and Cultural Studies, University of Queensland, October 21, 2008. Last but not least, I need to thank heartily anonymous reviewers whose suggestions for improving this paper have been invaluable.

References

  1. Ali, K. (2006). Sexual ethics and Islam. Feminist reflections on Qur’an, Hadith, and Jurisprudence. Oxford: Oneworld.Google Scholar
  2. Baumann, M. (1995). Conceptualizing Diaspora: the preservation of religious identity in foreign parts, exemplified by Hindu communities outside India. Temenos, 31, 19–35.Google Scholar
  3. Baumann, M. (2004). A diachronic view of Diaspora, the significance of religion and Hindu Trinidadians. In W. Kokot, K. Tölölyan & C. Alfonso (Eds.), Diaspora, identity and religion. New directions in theory and research (pp. 170–188). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bouhdiba, A. (1982). [1975] La sexualité en islam. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  6. Brouwer, L. (2004). Dutch-Muslims on the internet: a new discussion platform. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 24(1), 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bunt, G. R. (1999). Islam@Britain.net: ‘British Muslim’ identities in cyberspace. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 10(3), 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bunt, G. R. (2000). Virtually Islamic: Computer-mediated communication and cyber Islamic environments. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bunt, G. R. (2003). Islam in the digital age: E-Jihad, online Fatwas and cyber Islamic environments. Sterling: Pluto.Google Scholar
  10. Bunt, G. R. (2009). iMuslims: Rewriting the House of Islam. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell, H. (2004). Challenges created by online religious networks. Journal of Media and Religion, 3(2), 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Castells, M. (1996). The information age: Economy, society and culture (Vol. 1: The Rise of the Network Society). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Chebel, M. (1999). Le corps en islam. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  14. Dawson, L. L. (2001). Cyberspace and religious life: Conceptualizing the concerns and consequences. Paper presented at the CESNUR 2001 conference. London. Available online at http://www.cesnur.org/2001/london2001/dawson.htm. Accessed March 23, 2008.
  15. Fairclough, N. (2002). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Garcia, A. C., et al. (2009). Ethnographic approaches to the internet and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38(1), 52–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Helland, C. (2002). Surfing for salvation. Religion, 32, 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Hine, C. (2006). [2000] The virtual objects of ethnography, 6 vols. In D. Bell (Ed.), Cybercultures. Critical concepts in media and cultural studies. Thinking and doing cyberculture (Vol. 2, pp. 286–316). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Horrigan, J. B. (2001). Online communities: Networks that nurture long-distance relationships and local ties’ [Report]. Washington: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Online: www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/47/report_display.asp. Accessed July 26, 2008.Google Scholar
  21. Jacoby, S., & Ochs, E. (1995). Co-construction: an introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnstone, B. (2002). Discourse analysis. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Kabir, N. A. (2008). Are young Muslims adopting Australian values? Australian Journal of Education, 52(3), 229–241.Google Scholar
  24. Karaflogka, A. (2006). E-religion. A critical appraisal of religious discourse on the world wide web. Equinox: London.Google Scholar
  25. Kolig, E., & Kabir, N. A. (2008). Not friend, not foe: the rocky road of enfranchisement of Muslims into multicultural nationhood in Australia and New Zealand. Immigrants and Minorities, 26(3), 266–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kort, A. (2005). Dar al-cyber Islam: women, domestic violence, and the Islamic reformation on the world wide wed. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 25(3), 363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mafessoli, M. (1996). The time of the tribes. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Mandaville, P. (2002). Reimagining the Ummah? Information technology and the changing boundaries of political Islam. In A. Mohammadi (Ed.), Islam encountering globalization (pp. 61–90). London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
  29. Mandaville, P. (2004). [2001] Transnational Muslim politics: Reimagining the Umma. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Marranci, G. (2008). The anthropology of Islam. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  31. Mazrui, A., & Mazrui, A. (2001). The digital revolution and the new reformation: doctrine and gender in Islam. Harvard International Review, 23(1), 52–55.Google Scholar
  32. McCutcheon, R. T. (1999). The insider/outsider problem in the study of religion: A reader. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  33. Musallam, B. F. (1983). Sex and society in Islam: Birth control before the nineteenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Paltridge, B. (2006). Discourse analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  35. Rahimi, B. (2008). The politics of the internet in Iran. In M. Semati (Ed.), Media, culture and society in Iran: Living with globalization and the Islamic State (pp. 37–56). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Rotherford, J. (1990). The third space: Interview with Homi Bhabha. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 207–221). London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
  37. Rozario, S. (1998). On being Australian and Muslim: Muslim women as defenders of Islamic heritage. Women’s Studies International Forum, 21(6), 649–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shotter, J. (1993). Becoming someone: Identity and belonging. In N. Coupland & J. F. Nussbaum (Eds.), Discourse and lifespan identity (pp. 5–27). Sage: Newbury Park.Google Scholar
  39. Shotter, J. (1995). Dialogical psychology. In J. A. Smith, R. Harré & L. van Langanhove (Eds.), Rethinking psychology (pp. 160–178). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, M. A. (1999). Invisible crowds in cyberspace: Mapping the social structure of the Usenet. In M. A. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 195–221). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Tirado, F., & Gálvez, A. (2007). Positioning theory and discourse analysis: Some tools for social interaction analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(2), Article 31. Online: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-07/07-2-31-e.htm. Accessed July 11, 2008.
  42. Varisco, D. M. (2000). E-ethnography: on line but not out of sight. Anthropology News, 41(7), 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Varisco, D. M. (2002). September 11: Participant Webservation of the “war on terrorism”. American Anthropologist, 104(3), 934–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Varisco, D. M. (2007). Virtual Dasein: Ethnography in cyberspace. CyberOrient: Online Journal of the Virtual Middle East. Online: http://cyberorient.net. Accessed July 11, 2008.
  45. Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999). Virtual communities as communities: Net surfers don’t ride alone. In M. A. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 167–194). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Wilson, S. M., & Peterson, L. C. (2002). The anthropology of online communities. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 449–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Young, G. (2004). Reading and praying online: The continuity of religion online and online religion in internet Christianity. In L. Dawson & D. Cowan (Eds.), Religion online: Finding faith on the internet (pp. 93–106). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School HPRCThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations