Advertisement

Contemporary Islam

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 53–67 | Cite as

Cyber-Islamophobia? The case of WikiIslam

  • Göran Larsson
Article

Abstract

A large amount of academic research has analysed and documented the fact that Muslims are often presented in a negative or stereotypical way in Western media and popular culture. This article focuses on how the Internet can also be used in spreading and publishing anti-Islamic and anti-Muslim opinions. Although the Internet is significant in the development of contemporary society, no studies have focused on the importance of information and communication technologies in spreading Islamophobic opinions. However, the new technologies can also be used for monitoring and combating Islamophobia, and many Muslim organisations are today using the Internet for these purposes. The article is based on an indepth analysis of both anti-Muslim and pro-Muslim homepages that can be related to the debate over Islamophobia.

Keywords

Internet Islam Islamophobia Reactive identities 

References

  1. Allievi, S. (2003). The media. In B. Maréchal, et al. (Eds.), Muslim in the enlarged Europe: Religion and society. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.Google Scholar
  2. Allievi, S. (2006). How and why “Muslims” became “Muslims.” In ISIM Review, No. 18.Google Scholar
  3. Berg, M. (1998). Hudud: Ett resonemang om populärorientalismens bruksvärde och världsbild. Stockholm: Carlsson.Google Scholar
  4. Brasher, B. (2001). Give me that online religion. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Brückner, M. (2001). Fatwas zum Alkohol unter dem Einfluss neuer Medien in 20 Jhdt. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. Bunt, G. R. (2000). Virtually Islamic: Computer-mediated communication and cyber Islamic environments. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bunt, G. R. (2003). Islam in the digital age: E-jihad, online fatwas and cyber Islamic environments. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  8. Chryssides, G. D. (2005). “Come on up, and I will show thee”: Heaven’s gate as a postmodern group. In J. R. Lewis & J. A. Petersen (Eds.), Controversial new religions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dawson, L. L. (2004). Religion on the Internet: Presence, problems, and prospects. In P. Antes, A. W. Geertz, & R. R. Warne (Eds.), New approaches to the study of religion: Volume 1: Regional, critical, and historical approaches. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  10. Dawson, L. L., & Hennebry, J. (2004). New religions and the Internet: Recruiting in a new public space. In L. L. Dawson & D. E. Cowan (Eds.), Religion online: Finding faith on the Internet. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. EUMC (2006). Muslims in the European union: Discrimination and Islamophobia. Vienna: European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia.Google Scholar
  12. Helland, C. (2002). Religion online/online religion and virtual communitas. In J. K. Hadden & D. E. Cowan (Eds.), Religion on the Internet: Research prospects and promises. London: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  13. Helland, C. (2005). Online religion as lived religion: Methodological issues in the study of religious participation on the Internet. Online – Heidelberg Journal of Religions on the Internet, 1(1).Google Scholar
  14. Højsgaard, M. T. (2006). Connecting without belonging: Interfaith dialogue and religious conflicts within online settings. In G. Larsson (Ed.), Religious communities on the Internet. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
  15. Jones, S. (Ed.) (1999). Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the net. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Kendall, L. (1999). Recontextualizing “Cyberspace”: methodological considerations for on-line research. In S. Jones (Ed.), Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the net. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. O’Leary, S. (2005). Utopian and dystopian possibilities of networked religion in the new millennium. In M. T. Højsgaard & M. Warburg (Eds.), Religion and cyberspace. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Runnymede Trust (1997) Islamophobia: A challenge for us all. London: The Runnymede Trust.Google Scholar
  19. Said, E. W. (1981). Covering Islam: How the media and the experts determine how we see the rest of the world. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Shaheen, J. (2001). Reel bad Arabs: How Hollywood vilifies a people. Northampton: Interlink.Google Scholar
  21. Siddiqi, M. Z. (1993). Hadith literature: Its origin, development and special features. Cambridge: Islamic Text Society.Google Scholar
  22. Wiegers, G. (2002). Muslim discussions on organ donations to adherents of other religions. In W. A. R. Shadid & P. S. van Koningsveld (Eds.), Intercultural relations and religious authorities: Muslims in the European Union. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Religious Studies and TheologyGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations