Abbott, K., & Snidal, D. (1998). Why states act through formal international organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42
, 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2010). International regulation without international government: Improving IO performance through orchestration. The Review of International Organizations, 5(3), 315–344.
Aberbach, J., & Rockman, B. (2002). Conducting and coding elite interviews. Political Science & Politics, 35
(4), 673–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, R. J. (2009). Global intelligence co-operation versus accountability: new facets to an old problem. Intelligence and National Security, 24
(1), 26–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allegret, J.-P., & Dulbecco, P. (2006). The institutional failures of International Monetary Fund conditionality. The Review of International Organizations, 2
(4), 309–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argote, L. (2011). Organizational learning research: Past, present and future. Management Learning, 42
(4), 439–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerswald, D. P., & Saideman, S. M. (2014). NATO in Afghanistan
. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avant, D. (2016). Netting the empire: Relationships and US roles governing small arms and military and security services. In D. Avant & O. Westerwinter (Eds.), The New Power Politics: Networks and Transnational Security Governance
. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avant, D., & Sigelman, L. (2010). Private security and democracy: Lessons from the US in Iraq. Security Studies, 19
(2), 230–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, R., & Borzutzky, S. (2006). NATO and the war on terror: the organizational challenges of the post 9/11 world. The Review of International Organizations, 1
(3), 293–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R. (2016). The World Trade Organization and the future of multilateralism. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30
(1), 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the world
. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Benner, T., Mergenthaler, S., & Rotmann, P. (2011). The new world of UN peace operations
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, S. (2012). Ideational theorizing in the social sciences since “policy paradigms, social learning, and the state.” Governance, 26(2), 217–237.
Blease, D. (2010). Lessons from NATO’s military missions in the western Balkans. Connect, 9
(3), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, D. M., et al. (2014). Ideology, learning, and policy diffusion: Experimental evidence. American Journal of Political Science, 59
(4), 37–49.Google Scholar
Campbell, S. P. (2008). When process matters: The potential implications of organisational learning for peacebuilding success. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 4(2), 20–32.
Cilliers, J., Boshoff, H., & Aboagye, F. (2010). Somalia: The intervention dilemma. Pretoria: Institute for Security Studies.
Clair, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2007). A “total” responsibility management approach to crisis management and signal detection in organizations. In International Handbook of Organizational Crisis Management (pp. 299–313). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Daalder, I. H., & Lindsay, J. M. (2003). America unbound. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Dafoe, A., Renshon, J., & Huth, P. (2014). Reputation and status as motives for war. Annual Review of Political Science, 17
(1), 371–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, P. H. (2001). Spies as Informants: Triangulation and the Interpretation of Elite Interview Data in the Study of the Intelligence and Security Services. Politics, 21
(1), 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, H. (2012). Efficiency versus sovereignty: Delegation to the UN secretariat in peacekeeping. International Peacekeeping, 19
(5), 581–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, H. (2015). Functionalism, multiple principals and the reform of the NATO secretariat after the Cold War. Cooperation and Conflict, 50(1), 128–145.
Domke, D., et al. (2000). Elite messages and source cues: moving beyond partisanship. Political Communication, 17
(4), 395–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dragojlovic, N. (2013). Leaders without Borders: Familiarity as a moderator of transnational source cue effects. Political Communication, 30(2), 297–316.
Dreher, A., Sturm, J. E., & Vreeland, J. R. (2009). Global horse trading: IMF loans for votes in the United Nations Security Council. European Economic Review, 53(7), 742–757.
Druckman, J. N. (2001). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? The Journal of Politics, 63
(4), 1041–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes
. Fort Worth: Harcourt, Brace and Janovich.Google Scholar
Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of power
. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Faleg, G. (2017). The EU's Common Security and Defence policy: Learning communities in international organizations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Findley, M. G., Nielson, D. L., & Sharman, J. C. (2013). Using field experiments in international relations: a randomized study of anonymous incorporation. International Organization, 67
(04), 657–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, R., MacFarlane, S. N., & Mastanduno, M. (Eds.). (2003). US hegemony and international organizations: The United States and multilateral institutions
. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fortna, V. P., & Howard, L. M. (2008). Pitfalls and prospects in the peacekeeping literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 11
(1), 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallup. (2003). Many Europeans oppose war in Iraq. USA Today
. Available at: http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/world/2003-02-14-eu-survey.htm
George, A., Hall, D., & Simons, W. (1971). The limits of coercive diplomacy. Boston: Little Brown & Co.
Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2012). Field experiments. New York: W W Norton & Company.
Gherardi, S. (2009). Organizational knowledge. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Goldsmith, B. E., & Horiuchi, Y. (2009). Spinning the globe? U.S. public diplomacy and foreign public opinion. The Journal of Politics, 71
(03), 863–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourlay, C. (2004). European Union procedures and resources for crisis management. International Peacekeeping, 11
(3), 404–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gribble, R., et al. (2014). British public opinion after a decade of war: Attitudes to Iraq and Afghanistan. Politics, 35(2), 128–150.
Gutner, T., & Thompson, A. (2010). The politics of IO performance: A framework. Review of International Organizations, 5, 227–248.
Haas, E. (1990). When knowledge is power
. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Habyarimana, J., Humphreys, M., Posner, D., & Weinstein, J. (2009). Coethnicity. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Hafner-Burton, E., & Montgomery, A. (2008). Power or plenty: How do international trade institutions affect economic sanctions? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52(2), 213–242.
Hafner-Burton, E. M., Hughes, D. A., & Victor, D. G. (2013). The cognitive revolution and the political psychology of elite decision making. Perspectives on Politics, 11
(02), 368–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, E. M., et al. (2014). Decision maker preferences for international legal cooperation. International Organization, 68
(04), 845–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardt, H. (2013). Keep friends close but colleagues closer: Efficiency in the establishment of peace operations. Global Governance, 19, 377–399.
Hardt, H. (2014). Time to react: The efficiency of international organizations in crisis response. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hardt, H. (2016a). From states to secretariats: Delegation in the African Union Peace and Security Council. African Security, 9
(3), 161–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardt, H. (2016b). How NATO remembers: Explaining institutional memory in NATO crisis management. European Security, 25
(5), 1–29.Google Scholar
Harnisch, S. (2011). Conceptualizing in the minefield: Role theory and foreign policy learning. Foreign Policy Analysis, 8
(1), 47–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, D., & Guardino, M. (2011). The influence of foreign voices on U.S. public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 55
(4), 831–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, R., & Choi, J. K. (2007). From prediction to learning: Opening experts’ minds to unfolding history. International Security, 31
(4), 132–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschmann, G. (2012). Organizational learning in United Nations' peacekeeping exit strategies. Cooperation and Conflict, 47
(3), 368–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, L. M. (2008). UN peacekeeping in civil wars
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hurd, I. (2008). After anarchy: Legitimacy and power in the United Nations security Council. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Johnson, T. (2014). Organizational progeny. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kang, H., et al. (2011). Source cues in online news: Is the proximate source more powerful than distal sources? Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(4), 719–736.
Kay, S., & Kahn, S. (2008). NATO and counter-insurgency: Strategic liability or tactical asset? Contemporary Security Policy, 28
(1), 163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khong, Y. F. (1992). Analogies at war
. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Knopf, J. (2003). The importance of international learning. Review of International Studies, 29
, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollars, N. (2014). Military innovation’s dialectic: Gun trucks and rapid acquisition. Security Studies, 23(4), 787–813.
Kuklinski, J. H., & Hurley, N. L. (1994). On hearing and interpreting political messages: A cautionary tale of citizen cue-taking. The Journal of Politics, 56(3), 729–751.
LaPalombara, J. (2003). The underestimated contributions of political science to organizational learning. In M. Easterby-Smith & M. Lyles (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge (p. 137–160). New York: Oxford University Press.
Layne, C. (2000). US hegemony and the perpetuation of NATO. Journal of Strategic Studies, 23
(3), 59–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebovic, J. H., & Voeten, E. (2006). The politics of shame: The condemnation of country human rights practices in the UNCHR. International Studies Quarterly, 50
(4), 861–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebow, R. N. (2006). The memory of politics in postwar europe. In R. Lebow, W. Kansteiner & C. Fogu (Eds.), The politics of memory in postwar Europe (p. 1–39). Durham: Duke University Press.
Levy, J. S. (1994). Learning and foreign policy: Sweeping a conceptual minefield. International Organization, 48(02), 279–312.
Lipson, M. (2010). Performance under ambiguity: International organization performance in UN peacekeeping. Review of International Studies, 5(3), 249–284.
MacPhail, L., & Edmondson, A. (2011). Learning domains: The importance of work context in organizational learning from error. In D. Hofmann & M. Frese (Eds.), Errors in Organizations (p. 177–198). New York: Routledge.
McDermott, R. (2011). New directions for experimental work in International Relations. International Studies Quarterly, 55, 503–520.
Mintz, A., Redd, S. B., & Vedlitz, A. (2006). Can we generalize from student experiments to the real world in political science, military affairs, and international relations? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50
(5), 757–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintz, A., Yang, Y., & McDermott, R. (2011). Experimental approaches to international relations. International Studies Quarterly, 55
(2), 493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorman, C., & Miner, A. S. (1998). Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. The Academy of Management Review, 23
, 698–723.Google Scholar
NATO. (2011). The NATO lessons learned handbook. Second Edition. Lisbon: NATO.
NATO. (2015). Defence expenditures data for 2014 and estimates for 2015, Available at: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_120866.htm
Nicholson, S. P. (2011). Dominating cues and the limits of elite influence. The Journal of Politics, 73
(04), 1165–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249–273.
Pillar, P. R. (2011). Intelligence and U.S. Foreign Policy: Iraq, 9/11, and Misguided Reform. New York: Columbia University Press.
Pouliot, V. (2010). International security in practice: The politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renshon, J. (2015). Losing face and sinking costs: experimental evidence on the judgment of political and military leaders. International Organization, 69
(3), 659–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rynning, S. (2012). NATO in Afghanistan: The liberal disconnect
. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sagan, S. D. (1994). Organized for accidents. Security Studies, 3
(3), 509–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagan, S. D. (1995). The limits of safety
. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shellman, S. (2006). Process matters: Conflict and cooperation in sequential government-dissident interactions. Security Studies, 15(4), 563–599.
Smith, H. (1994). Intelligence and UN peacekeeping. Survival, 36
(3), 174–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, J. (2007). The Somali Model? The National Interest, 90
, 41–45.Google Scholar
Tansey, O. (2007). Process tracing and elite interviewing: A case for non-probability sampling. PS: Political Science and Politics, 4(4), 765–772.
Weaver, C. (2010). The politics of performance evaluation: Independent evaluation at the International Monetary Fund. The Review of International Organizations,
Weiss, T. G., & Thakur, R. (2010). Global Governance and the UN
. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Yost, D. S. (2014). NATO’s balancing act. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.