Who matters for memory: Sources of institutional memory in international organization crisis management

Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11558-017-9281-4

Cite this article as:
Hardt, H. Rev Int Organ (2017). doi:10.1007/s11558-017-9281-4

Abstract

Scholarship on organizational learning has explored how international organizations (IOs) reform but has paid little attention to the origins of institutional memory. For IOs engaged in crisis management operations, acquiring knowledge about strategic errors is necessary for adopting reforms that could save lives. This study seeks to identify the sources that affect whether or not IO elites will contribute knowledge to an IO’s institutional memory in crisis management. The study employs a survey experiment in the field on 120 NATO elites who decide on and plan operations. Findings indicate that when the United States introduces knowledge of a strategic error, NATO elites are significantly less likely to share it. This deterrent effect on knowledge-sharing illustrates an unexpected way in which the US influences international crisis management. The study also finds that an IO’s secretariat can somewhat increase elites’ likelihood of contributing to the IO’s institutional memory.

Keywords

Institutional memory NATO Crisis management International security Organizational learning United States International organization 

Supplementary material

11558_2017_9281_MOESM1_ESM.docx (3.5 mb)
ESM 1(DOCX 3555 kb)
11558_2017_9281_MOESM2_ESM.do (14 kb)
ESM 2(DO 13 kb)
11558_2017_9281_MOESM3_ESM.dta (16 kb)
ESM 3(DTA 15 kb)

Funding information

Funder NameGrant NumberFunding Note
Fulbright Commission

    Copyright information

    © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. 1.Department of Political Science, School of Social SciencesUniversity of California, IrvineIrvineUSA

    Personalised recommendations