The internationalization of production and the politics of compliance in WTO disputes
- 215 Downloads
In this paper we seek to advance the debate on the conditions under which the WTO Dispute Settlement Body can bring about trade-liberalizing policy change in WTO members. Under what conditions do WTO members change domestic policies or measures that are challenged in WTO litigation? Starting from the assumption that policymakers are political-support maximizers who seek to avoid the mobilization of political enemies, we argue that the degree of integration in Global Value Chains (GVCs) of the economic sectors affected by a WTO dispute influences members’ propensity to change domestic policies when targeted in WTO litigation. The initiation of a WTO dispute against sectors highly integrated in GVCs engenders the emergence of a domestic coalition of pro-trade liberalization groups composed of exporters seeking to avoid the imposition of retaliatory measures and import-dependent firms wishing to exploit the opportunity to access cheaper imports. Under these circumstances, trade-liberalizing responses to WTO legal challenges are therefore more likely. We test this hypothesis by estimating a Cox proportional hazard model and find that GVCs positively impact states’ propensity to comply with the WTO dispute settlement panel rulings.
KeywordsInternational institutions World trade organization Global value chains Compliance
We are grateful to the attendees of the 9th Political Economy of International Organizations (PEIO) conference held in Salt Lake City, Utah. We extend our thanks to Leonardo Baccini, for his valuable comments. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Research Fund of the University of Antwerp.
- Amador, J., & Cabra S. (2014). Global Value Chains Surveying Drivers and Measures. Working Paper 1739 (2014). Frankfurt: European Central Bank (ECB). https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1739.en.pdf?13f6d86f40a3c60325f27cbc08a18742. Accessed 22 March 2016.
- Antràs, P. (2010). International trade and organizations. Vol. 2. National Bureau of Economic Research. Reporter 2010, 2, 7-10.Google Scholar
- Baccini, L., Dür, A., & Elsig, M. (2015). Intra-industry trade, global value chains, and the political economy of Preferential trade liberalization. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
- Bagwell, K., Mavroidis, P., & Staiger, R. (2004). The case for tradable remedies in WTO dispute settlement. Discussion paper no. 0405-05. New York: Department of Economics, Columbia University.Google Scholar
- Baldwin, R. (2012). Global supply chains: Why they emerged, why they matter, and where they are going. In Working Paper 2012–01. Hong Kong: Fung Global Institute.Google Scholar
- Bernard, A., Jensen, B. and Schott, P. K. (2009). Importers, exporters, and multinationals: A portrait of firms in the U.S. that trade goods. In Producer Dynamics edited by Timothy Dunne, J. Bradford Jensen and Mark J. Roberts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Bown, C. (2009). Self-enforcing trade: Developing countries and WTO dispute settlement. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Bown, C., & Reynolds, K. (2015). Trade flows and trade disputes. The Review of International Organizations, 10, 145–177. doi: 10.1007/s11558-014-9208-2.
- Brewster, R., & Chilton, A. (2014). Supplying Complinace: Why and when the United States complies with WTO rulings. Yale Journal of International Law, 39(2), 201–246.Google Scholar
- Burch, D., & Lawrence, G. (2005). Supermarket own brands, supply chains and the transformation of the agri-food system. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 13(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
- Busch, M. (2000). Bargaining in the shadow of the law: Early settlement in GATT/WTO disputes. Fordham International Law Journal, 24, 158–172.Google Scholar
- Busch, M., & Reinhardt, E. (2003). Transatlantic trade conflicts and GATT/ WTO dispute settlement. In Dispute Prevention and Dispute Settlement in the Transatlantic Partnership (eds) Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann and Mark Pollack. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Chaudoin, S., Kucik, J., & Pelc K., (2016). Do WTO disputes actually increase trade? International Studies Quarterly, 0, 1–13 – Advanced online publication. Accessible via: http://isq.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/04/15/isq.sqw009.
- Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2002). The European Commission’s strategy to respond to the US decision to impose protectionist duties on steel imports. MEMO/02/59, 18 March.Google Scholar
- Davey, W. J. (2005). Implementation in WTO dispute settlement: An Introduction to the problems and possible solutions. In Research paper 05–16. Chicago: College of Law, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
- Davis, C. (2012). Why adjudicate: Enforcing trade rules in the WTO. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Davis, C., & Pelc, K. (2015). Cooperation in hard Times: Self-Restraint of Trade Protection. Journal of Conflict Resolution. doi: 10.1177/0022002715595699.
- De Bièvre, D., Poletti, A., Hanegraff, M., & Beyers, J. (2016). International institutions and interest mobilization: The WTO and lobbying in EU and US trade policy. Journal of World Trade, 50(2), 289–312.Google Scholar
- De Bièvre, D., Poletti, A., & Yildirim, A. (2017). About the melting of icebergs: Discovering the political-economic determinants of dispute initiation and resolution in the WTO. In M. Elsig, B. Hoekman, & J. Pauwelyn (Eds.), In Assessing the World Trade Organisation: Fit for Purpose? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Dür, A. (2010). Protection for exporters: Power and discrimination in Transatlantic trade relations, 1930–2010. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Eckhardt, J. (2011). Firm lobbying and EU trade policy making: Reflections on the anti-dumping case against Chinese and Vietnamese shoes (2005-2011). Journal of World Trade, 45(5), 965–991.Google Scholar
- Eckhardt, J. (2013). ‘EU unilateral trade policy-making: What role for import-dependent firms?’. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(6), 989–1005.Google Scholar
- Elms, D. & Low, P. (2013). “Global value chains in a changing world”, Introduction, Switzerland: World Trade Organization. Accessible via: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/aid4tradeglobalvalue13_e.pdf. Accessed 30 March 2017.
- Goldstein, J., & Steinberg, R. (2008). Negotiate or litigate? Effects of WTO judicial delegation on US trade politics. Law and Contemporary Problems, 71(1), 257–282.Google Scholar
- Grossman, G., & Helpman, E. (1994). Protection for sale. The American Economic Review, 84(4), 833–850.Google Scholar
- Grossman, G., & Helpman, E. (2001). Special interest politics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Henisz, W. J. (2011). Political constraints database. Data and codebook accessed via; http://www-management.wharton.upenn.edu/henisz/.
- Hoffman, T., & Kim, S. Y. (2009). The political economy of compliance in WTO disputes. Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
- Horn, H., Nordström, H., & Mavroidis, P. (1999). Is the use of the WTO dispute settlement system biased? Discussion paper 2340. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
- Horn, H., Johannesson, L., & Mavroidis, P. (2011). The WTO dispute settlement system 1995-2010: Some descriptive statistics. Journal of World Trade, 45(6), 1107–1138.Google Scholar
- Hudec, R. E. (1993). Enforcing international trade law: The evolution of the modern GATT legal system. Salem: Butterworth Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
- Jacobs, M. (2016). Smart threats and success in WTO dispute settlement: The bush steel tariffs. E-International Relations, March 24, 2016. http://www.e-ir.info/2016/03/24/smart-threats-and-success-in-wto-dispute-settlement-the-bush-steel-tariffs/. Accessed 1 November 2016.
- Keohane, R. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Kim, S. Y. (2012). Protectionism during recession: Is this time different? The Political Economist, 9(2), 6–8.Google Scholar
- Kim, S. Y. (2015). Regionalization in search of regionalism: Production networks and deep integration commitments in Asia’s PTAs. In In The Purpose, Design, and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements, (eds) Andreas Dür and Manfred Elsig. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Kropko, J., & Harden, J. (n.d.). Beyond the hazard ratio: Generating expected durations from the cox proportional hazards model. Working Paper. International Methods Colloquium. http://media.wix.com/ugd/13cbcb_c74861dcbc8448cf99da5c01de6f53d1.pdf. Accessed 12 April 2016.
- Krugman, P. (1981). “Intraindustry specialization and the gains from trade”. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 959–73.Google Scholar
- Lanz, R., & Miroudot, S. (2011). Intra-firm trade: Patterns, determinants and policy implications. Working paper 114. Trade policy papers. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) publishing. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/trade/intra-firm-trade_5kg9p39lrwnn-en. Accessed 12 April 2016.
- Magee, S., Brock, W. A., & Young, L. (1989). Black hole tariff and endogenous policy theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Mansfield, E., Milner, H., & Rosendorff, P. (2002). ‘Why democracies cooperate more: Electoral control and international trade agreements’. International Organization, 56(3), 477–513.Google Scholar
- Marshall, M., & Jaggers, K. (2002). Polity IV Project: Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2007. http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm. Accessed 12 April 2016.
- Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (1993). Glossary for Industrial Organisation Economics and Competition Law. https://www.oecd.org/regreform/sectors/2376087.pdf. Accessed 15 February 2016.
- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2014) Global Value Chains, Challenges, Opportunities, and Implications for Policy, Report prepared and submitted for the G-20 Trade Minister's Meeting, Sydney, Australia, July 2014. https://www.oecd.org/tad/gvc_report_g20_july_2014.pdf. Accessed 12 April 2016.
- Peritz, L. (2016). When are international institutions effective? The impact of domestic veto players on compliance with WTO rulings. Paper presented at the 9th annual meeting of the political economy of international organizations. Salt Lake City, Utah.Google Scholar
- Poletti, A., & De Bièvre, D. (2016). Judicial politics and international cooperation: From disputes to deal-making at the World Trade Organization. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
- Read, R. (2005). The EU-US WTO steel dispute: Political economy of protection and the efficacy of the WTO dispute settlement understanding. In N. Perdikis & R. Read (Eds.), The WTO and the regulation of international trade: Recent trade disputes between the European Union and the United States (pp. 135–175). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Schattschneider, E. E. (1935). Politics, pressures and the tariff. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Shaffer, G. (2003). Defending interests: Public-private partnerships in WTO litigation. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Spilker, G. (2012). Compliance with WTO dispute rulings. Working paper 2011-25. Zurich: Switzerland: National Centre of competence in research trade regulation.Google Scholar
- Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto players: How political institutions work. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- United States International Trade Commission (USITC) (2003). Steel-Consuming Industries: Competitive Conditions With Respect to Steel Safeguard Measures (Investigation No. 332–452).Google Scholar
- Von Stein, J. (2012). The Engines of Compliance. In Synthesizing Insights from International Law and International Relations, (eds) Jeffrey Dunoff and Mark Pollack. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Weiss, E., & Jacobson, H. K. (1998). Engaging countries: Strengthening compliance with international environmental accords. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- World Trade Organization. (2004). Handbook on the WTO dispute settlement system. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar