Women’s rights INGO shaming and the government respect for women’s rights

  • Amanda Murdie
  • Dursun Peksen


How effective are women’s rights international non-governmental organizations (WROs) in improving government respect for women’s rights? In this paper, we argue that WROs can be powerful actors in advancing women’s status, especially when they adopt a specific advocacy strategy: “naming and shaming” of governments or non-governmental agents. We assert that a targeted “naming and shaming” publicity strategy is necessary to exert pressure on the government to enforce women’s internationally recognized rights. Using a new dataset on the advocacy activities of over 1,595 WROs, we test the implications of our argument in a global statistical model from 1991 to 2005. The results indicate that WRO shaming is likely to improve women’s economic and social rights while having no discernible impact on women’s political rights. We also find that the mere presence of WROs is unlikely to have a significant impact on women’s rights. One major implication of the findings is that any significant improvement in respect for women’s rights partly requires a strong voice in advocacy. The findings also suggest that governments that face pressure from advocacy groups are more inclined to promote and enforce only the rights that do not threaten their own political power and status, such as women’s social and economic rights.


Women’s rights INGOs Shaming Human rights 

JEL Classifications

F53 L31 

Supplementary material (1.9 mb)
ESM 1 (ZIP 1.87 mb)


  1. Afsharipour, A. (1999). Empowering ourselves: the role of Women’s NGOs in the enforcement of the Women’s convention. Columbia Law Review, 99(1), 129–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avdeveya, O. (2007). When Do states comply with international treaties? policies on violence against women in post‐communist countries. International Studies Quarterly, 51(4), 877–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barry, C. M., Chad Clay, K., & Flynn, M. E. (2013). Avoiding the spotlight: human rights shaming and foreign direct investment. International Studies Quarterly, 57(3), 532–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beer, C. (2009). Democracy and gender equality. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44(3), 212–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhagwati, J. (2004). In defense of globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bob, C. (2005). The marketing of rebellion: Insurgents, media, and international activism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Boli, J. & Thomas, G.M. (1999). INGOs and the Organization of World Culture. In J. Boli and G. M. Thomas (Ed.), Constructing World Culture: International Non-governmental Organizations Since 1875 (pp. 13–49). Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bond, D., Bond, J., Oh, C., Jenkins, J. C., & Taylor, C. L. (2003). Integrated Data for Events Analysis (IDEA): an event typology for automated events data development. Journal of Peace Research, 40(6), 733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyle, E. H. (2005). Female genital cutting: Cultural conflict in the global community. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brysk, A. (1993). From above and below social movements, the international system, and human rights in Argentina. Comparative Political Studies, 26(3), 259–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bush, S. S. (2011). International politics and the spread of quotas for women in legislatures. International Organization, 65(1), 103–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caprioli, M., Hudson, V. M., Mcdermott, R., Ballif-Spanvill, B., Emmett, C. F., & Stearmer, S. M. (2009). The WomanStats project database: advancing an empirical research agenda. Journal of Peace Research, 46(6), 839–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cardenas, S. (2007). Conflict and compliance: State responses to international human rights pressure. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  14. Chenoweth, E. & Stephan, M.J. (2011). Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Cherif, F. M. (2010). Culture, rights and norms: women’s rights reform in Muslim countries. Journal of Politics, 72(4), 1144–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cingranelli, D. L. & Richards, D.L. (2012). The Cingranelli-Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Data Project Coding Manual. http:
  17. Clark, C., Sprenger, E., & VeneKlasen, L. (2006). Where is the Money for Women’s Rights. Association for Women’s Rights in Development. Last Accessed: July 14, 2014.
  18. Coe, A. (2009). ‘Being in the spaces where decisions are made’: reproductive rights advocacy and policy influence in two regions of Peru. Social Movement Studies, 8(4), 427–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cole, W. M. (2012). Government respect for gendered rights: the effect of the convention on the elimination of discrimination against women on Women’s rights outcomes, 1981–2004. International Studies Quarterly, 57(2), 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davis, D. R., Murdie, A., & Garnett, C. (2012). Makers and shapers: human rights INGOs and public opinion. Human Rights Quarterly, 34(1), 199–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. DeMeritt, J. H. R. (2012). International organizations and government killing: does naming and shaming save lives? International Interactions, 38(5), 597–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Donnelly, J. (2003). Universal human rights in theory and practice. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Donno, D., & Russett, B. (2004). Islam, authoritarianism, and female empowerment: what are the linkages? World Politics, 56(4), 582–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Drury, A. C., & Peksen, D. (2014). Women and economic statecraft: the negative impact economic sanctions visit on women. European Journal of International Relations, 20(2), 2463–2490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Enloe, C. (2000). Maneuvers: The international politics of militarizing Women’s lives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Fábián, K., (Ed.). (2010). Domestic Violence in Postcommunist States: Local Activism, National Policies, and Global Forces. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Frankel, J., & Romer, P. (1999). Does trade cause growth? American Economic Review, 89(3), 379–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Franklin, J. C. (2008). Shame on you: the impact of human rights criticism on political repression in Latin America. International Studies Quarterly, 52(1), 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Friedman, E. J. (2003). Gendering the agenda: the impact of the transnational women’s rights movement at the UN conferences of the 1990s. Women’s Studies International Forum, 26(4), 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goldstein, J. S. (1992). A conflict-cooperation scale for WEIS events data. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 36(2), 369–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hafner-Burton, E. M., & Ron, J. (2009). Seeing double: human rights impact through qualitative and quantitative eyes. World Politics, 61(2), 360–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hausmann, R., Tyson, L. D., & Zahidi, S. (2007). The global gender Gap report 2007. Geneva: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  33. Hawkins, D. G. (2002). International human rights and authoritarian rule in Chile.Vol. 6. University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hedeker, D., & Gibbons, R. D. (1994). A random-effects ordinal regression model for multilevel analysis. Biometrics, 50(4), 933–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hendrix, C. S., & Wong, W. H. (2014). Knowing your audience: How the structure of international relations and organizational choices affect amnesty International’s advocacy. The Review of International Organizations, 9(1), 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hill, D. W. (2010). Estimating the effects of human rights treaties on state behavior. Journal of Politics, 72(4), 1161–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Htun, M., & Weldon, S. L. (2012). The civic origins of progressive policy change: combating violence against women in global perspective, 1975–2005. American Political Science Review, 106(3), 548–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Human Rights Watch. (2013). Russia: Free Pussy Riot Members. Last Accessed: July 14, 2014.
  39. Isgandarova, N. (2013). NGOs’ expectations of the CSW57 and national governments. Today’s Zamen. March 14. Last Accessed: July 14, 2014.
  40. Jafar, A. (2011). Women’s NGOs in Pakistan. Palgrave Macmillian.Google Scholar
  41. Joachim, J. (2003). Framing issues and seizing opportunities: the UN, NGOs, and women’s rights. International Studies Quarterly, 47(2), 247–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Keck, M E. & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  43. King, G., & Lowe, W. (2003). An analysis automated information extraction tool for international conflict data with performance as good as human coders: a rare events evaluation design. International Organization, 57(3), 617–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. King, G., Tomz, M., & Wittenberg, J. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Krain, M. (2012). J’accuse! does naming and shaming perpetrators reduce the severity of genocides or politicides? International Studies Quarterly, 56(3), 574–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Marshall, M. G. & Jaggers, J. (2000). Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2003.
  47. McCammon, H. J. (2003). ‘Out of the parlors and into the Streets’: the changing tactical repertoire of the US Women’s suffrage movements. Social Forces, 81(3), 787–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McDougall, G. J. (2004). A decade in human rights law: decade of NGO struggle. Human Rights Brief, 11(3), 12–67.Google Scholar
  49. Meernik, J., Aloisi, R., Sowell, M., & Nichols, A. (2012). The impact of human rights organizations on naming and shaming campaigns. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(2), 233–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Meintjes, S., Pillay, A., & Tursher, M. (Eds.). (2001). The aftermath: women in post-conflict transformation. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  51. Mitchell, N. J., & McCormick, J. (1988). Economic and political explanations of human rights violations. World Politics, 40(4), 476–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Moser, C. O. N., & Clarke, F. C. (Eds.). (2001). Victims, perpetrators, and actors? gender, armed conflict and political violence. New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  53. Murdie, A. (2009). Signals without borders: The conditional impact of INGOs. Ph.D. Dissertation. Emory University.Google Scholar
  54. Murdie, A., & Davis, D. R. (2012). Shaming and blaming: using events data to assess the impact of human rights INGOs. International Studies Quarterly, 56(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Murdie, A., & Peksen, D. (2013). The impact of human rights INGO shaming on sanctions. The Review of International Organizations, 8(1), 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Murdie, A., & Peksen, D. (2014). More than just Hot Air: the impact of human rights INGO shaming on humanitarian interventions. Journal of Politics, 76(1), 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Murdie, A. & Urpelainen, J. (2014). Why Pick on Us? Environmental INGOs and State Shaming as a Strategic Substitute. Political Studies.Google Scholar
  58. Neumayer, E., & De Soysa, I. (2007). Globalization, Women’s economic rights and forced labour. World Economy, 30(10), 1510–1535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2001). Women and democracy: cultural obstacles to equal representation. Journal of Democracy, 12(3), 126–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Osirim, M. J. (2001). Making good on commitments to grassroots women: NGOs and empowerment for women in contemporary Zimbabwe. Women’s Studies International Forum, 24(2), 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Paxton, P., Hughes, M. M., & Green, J. L. (2006). The international women’s movement and women’s political representation, 1893–2003. American Sociological Review, 71(6), 898–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Peksen, D. (2011). Foreign military intervention and Women’s rights. Journal of Peace Research, 48(4), 455–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Poe, S. C., & Tate, C. N. (1994). Repression of human rights and personal integrity in the 1980s: a global analysis. American Political Science Review, 88(4), 852–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Poe, S. C., Tate, N., & Keith, L. C. (1999). Repression of the human right to personal integrity revisited. International Studies Quarterly, 43(2), 291–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Richards, D. L., & Gelleny, R. (2007). Women’s status and economic globalization. International Studies Quarterly, 51(4), 855–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Risse, T. (2002). Transnational Actors and World Politics. In T. Risse, W. Carlsenaes & B. Simmons (Ed.), Handbook of International Relations, Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  67. Risse, T., Ropp, S.C., & Sikkink, K. (Eds.). (1999). The power of human rights: International norms and domestic change. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Ron, J., Ramos, H., & Rodgers, K. (2005). Transnational informational politics: NGO human rights reporting, 1986–2000. International Studies Quarterly, 49(3), 557–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Simmons, B. A. (2009). Mobilizing for human rights: international law in domestic politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Smith-Cannoy, H. (2012). Insincere Commitments: Human Rights Treaties, Abusive States, and Citizen Activism. Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Strand, H., Carlsen, J., Gleditsch, N.P., Hegre, H., Ormhaug, C., & Wilhelmsen, L. (2005). Armed Conflict Dataset Codebook, version 3. International Peace Research Institute, Oslo.
  72. Tickner, A. J. (2001). Gendering world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Tomz, M., Wittenberg, J., & King, G. (2001). CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results (20th ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  74. True, J., & Mintrom, M. (2001). Transnational networks and policy diffusion: the case of gender mainstreaming. International Studies Quarterly, 45(1), 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ulrich, L. (2007). Well-behaved women seldom make history. Knopf.Google Scholar
  76. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2006). Human development report 2006: beyond scarcity: power, poverty and the global water crisis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  77. Wotipka, C.M., & Ramirez, F.O. (2008). World society and human rights: an event history analysis of the convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. The global diffusion of markets and democracy, 303–343.Google Scholar
  78. Yoo, E. (2011). International human rights regime, neoliberalism, and women’s social rights, 1984–2004. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 52(6), 503–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.University of MemphisMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations