The Review of International Organizations

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 163–203 | Cite as

Multilateral determinants of regionalism revisited

Article

Abstract

The idea that some features of the multilateral trading system create incentives for countries to join preferential trade agreements (PTAs) is among the first and most influential explanations for the wave of regionalism in the last decades. Until recently, only a few empirical studies have explored this hypothesis and their results have been accepted by many researchers and policy-makers to be a fact. In this study we revisit the question of whether multilateral events are important determinants of regionalism. We use an extended dataset and implement several empirical specifications in the analysis. Unlike previous work, our results provide little support for the relevance of variables such as the number of GATT/WTO members, ongoing trade negotiation rounds, and trade disputes as predictors of PTA formation.

Keywords

Free trade agreements World trade organization Regionalism 

JEL Classifications

F13 F53 

Supplementary material

11558_2014_9193_MOESM1_ESM.7z (15.5 mb)
(7z 15.5 MB)

References

  1. Anderson, J.E., & van Wincoop, E. (2004). Trade costs. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(3), 691–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagwell, K., & Staiger, R.W. (2004). Multilateral trade negotiations, bilateral opportunism and the rules of GATT/WTO . Journal of International Economics, 63(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin, R. (1995). A domino theory of regionalism In Baldwin, R., Haaparanta, P., Kiander, J. (Eds.), Expanding membership of the European Union, (pp. 25–47).Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baldwin, R. (2008). Big-think regionalism: A critical survey, NBER Working Papers,14056.Google Scholar
  5. Baldwin, R., & Jaimovich, D. (2012). Are free trade agreements contagious?Journal of International Economics, 88(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbieri, K., & Keshk, O. (2012). Correlates of war project trade data set codebook,Version 3.0, Discussion paper.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, N., Katz, J. N., Tucker, R. (1998). Taking time seriously: Time-series-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 1260—1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhagwati, J., & Panagariya, A. (1999). Preferential trading areas and multilateralism: Strangers, friends or foes? In Bhagwati, J., Krishna, P., Panagariya, A. (Eds.), Trading blocs: Alternative approaches to analyzing preferential trade agreements.MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Carter, D., & Signorino, C. (2011). Back to the future: Modeling time dependence in binary data. Political Analysis, 18(3), 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chamberlain, G. (1980). Analysis of covariance with qualitative data. Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 225–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, M.X., & Joshi, S. (2010). Third-country effects on the formation of free trade agreements. Journal of International Economics, 82(2), 238–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Egger, P., & Larch, M. (2008). Interdependent preferential trade agreement memberships: An empirical analysis. Journal of International Economics, 76(2), 384–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ethier, W. J. (1998). Regionalism in a multilateral world. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1214–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fernandez, R., & Portes, J. (1998). Returns to regionalism: An evaluation of non-traditional gains from RTAs. World Bank Economic Review, 12(2), 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freund, C. (2000). Multilateralism and the endogenous formation of preferential trade agreements. Journal of International Economics, 52(2), 359–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freund, C., & Ornelas, E. (2010). Regional trade agreements. Annual Review of Economics, 2(1), 139–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fugazza, M., & Robert-Nicoud, F. (2010). The ’emulator effect’ of the uruguay round on US regionalism. CEPR Discussion Papers, 7703.Google Scholar
  18. Gibler, D.M. (2009). International Military Alliances from 1648 to 2008, CQ Press,Washington.Google Scholar
  19. Guzman, A.T, & Simmons, B. (2005). Power plays and capacity constraints: The selection of defendants in WTO disputes. The Journal of Legal Studies, 34(2), 557–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harvie, C., Kimura, F., Lee, H.-H. (2005). New East Asian regionalism: Causes, progress and country perspectives, Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Hudec, R.E. (1993). Enforcing international trade law: The evolution of the modern GATT legal system, Butterworth Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Hufbauer, G., & Schott, J. (2008). Fitting Asia-Pacific agreements into the WTO system In Baldwin, R., & Low, P. (Eds.), Multilateralising regionalism: Challenges for the global trading system.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Javorcik, B.S., & Narciso, G. (2008). Differentiated products and evasion of import tariffs. Journal of International Economics, 76(2), 208–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krugman, P. (1991). The move toward free trade zones. Economic Review, 76(6), 6–25.Google Scholar
  25. Lester, S., & M. Bryan (2009). Bilateral and regional trade agreements: Commentary and analysis, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Liu, X., & Ornelas, E. (2013). Free trade agreements and the consolidation of democracy. CEPR Discussion Papers, 9279.Google Scholar
  27. Mansfield, E.D., Milner, H.V., Rosendorff, P.B. (2002). Replication, realism, and robustness: Analyzing political regimes and international trade. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 167–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mansfield, E.D., & Reinhardt, E. (2003). Multilateral determinants of regionalism: The effects of GATT/WTO on the formation of preferential trading arrangements. International Organization, 57(4), 829–862.Google Scholar
  29. Martin, P., Mayer, T., Thoenig, M. (2012). The geography of conflicts and free trade agreements. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 4(4), 1–35.Google Scholar
  30. McCalman, P. (2002). Multi-lateral trade negotiations and the most favored nation clause. Journal of International Economics, 57(1), 151–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Michalopoulos, C. (1999). The participation of the developing countries in the WTO. The World Economy, 22(1), 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reinhardt, E. (2001). Adjudication without enforcement in GATT disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45(2), 174–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. WTO (2012a). Dispute Settlement Gateway WTO.Google Scholar
  34. WTO (2012b). GATT analytical index - guide to GATT law and practice WTO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied Econometrics and International Economic PolicyGoethe UniversityFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations