Orchestration and transnational climate governance

Article

Abstract

With multilateral efforts to mitigate climate change in gridlock, attention has turned to transnational climate governance initiatives, through which sub- and non-state actors seek to reduce greenhouse gases. These initiatives include networks of cities committed to lowering their carbon footprints, voluntary corporate reduction targets and disclosure processes, and many of the rules that govern carbon markets. The paper considers the role of “traditional” actors in world politics—states and intergovernmental organizations—in orchestrating such initiatives. This strategy accounts for nearly a third of transnational climate governance initiatives, we find, and upends the conventional dichotomy between “top down” and “bottom up” solutions to global collective action problems. We develop a theory to explain when states and intergovernmental organizations are likely to engage in orchestration, and we provide initial support for this theory with a new dataset of transnational climate governance initiatives and case studies of two of the most active orchestrators, the World Bank and the United Kingdom.

Keywords

Climate policy Transnational governance International organizations Orchestration Environmental politics 

JEL

Q54 

Supplementary material

11558_2013_9174_MOESM1_ESM.docx (147 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 147 kb)

References

  1. Abbott, K. (2012). “The transnational regime complex for climate change.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, pp. 571–590.Google Scholar
  2. Abbott, K., & Snidal, D. (1998). Why States Act through formal international organisations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42(1), 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abbott, K., & Snidal, D. (2009). Strengthening international regulation through transnational governance: overcoming the orchestration deficit. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 42, 501–578.Google Scholar
  4. Abbott, K., & Snidal, D. (2010). International regulation without international government: improving IO performance through orchestration. Review of International Organizations, 5(3), 315–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Abbott, K. W., Genschal, P., et al. (2012). “Orchestration: Global governance through intermediaries.” Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
  6. Andonova, L., Betsill, M., et al. (2009). Transnational climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 9(2), 52–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Andonova, L. (2010). Public-private partnerships for the earth: politics and patterns of hybrid authority in the multilateral system. Global Environmental Politics, 10(2), 25–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Avant, D. D., Finnemore, M., & Sell, S. K. (Eds.). (2010). Who governs the globe? (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Birdsall, N. (2012). “The World Bank and Climate Change: Forever a Big Fish in a Small Pond?” Centre for Global Development Policy Paper 007. July 2012. Available at: http://www.cgdev.org/sites/default/files/1426335_file_Birdsall_Big_Fish_Small_Pond_final_0.pdf
  11. Börzel, T., & Risse, T. (2005). Public-private partnerships: Effective and legitimate tools of transnational governance. In Grande & Pauly (Eds.), Complex sovereignty: Reconstituting political authority in the twenty-first century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  12. Brende, B. (2001). “Fighting poverty and pollution with energy.” Side event on international initiative on reduced flaring of natural gas, Marrakech, 8 November. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTGGFR/64199955-1103819378762/20298988/MarNor.pdf
  13. Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L., et al. (2012). Governing climate change transnationally: assessing the evidence from a database of sixty initiatives. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(4), 591–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dalton, R. (2006). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies (4th ed.). Washington: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  15. Falkner, R., Stephan, H., et al. (2010). International climate policy after Copenhagen: towards a ‘Building Blocks’ approach. Global Policy, 1(3), 252–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fenno, R. (1986). Observation, context, and sequence in the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 80(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gilpin, R. (1971). The politics of transnational economic relations. International Organization, 25, 398–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Green, J. (2014). Rethinking private authority: Agents and entrepreneurs in global environmental governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Green, J. F. (2010). Private authority on the rise: A century of delegation in multilateral environmental treaties. Transnational actors in global governance. Jönsson and Tallberg. Houndmills, U.K., Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Green, J. F. (2013). Order out of chaos: public and private rules for managing carbon. Global Environmental Politics, 13(2), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greenwood, J., Pyper, R., et al. (2002). New public administration in Britain (3rd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Hafner-Burton, E., Kahler, M., et al. (2009). Network analysis for international relations. International Organization, 63(3), 559–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hale, T. (2011). “A Climate Coalition of the Willing.” The Washington Quarterly(Winter), pp. 89–101.Google Scholar
  24. Hale, T., & Held, D. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of transnational governance: Institutions and innovations. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  25. Hawkins, D., Lake, D., et al. (2006). Delegation and agency in international organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoffmann, M. (2011). Climate governance at the crossroads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Keohane, R. (1984). After hegemony. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Keohane, R., & Nye, J. (1974). Transgovernmental relations and international organizations. World Politics, 27(1), 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keohane, R., & Victor, D. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Koenig-Archibugi, M. (2005). Introduction: Institutional diversity in global governance. In Koenig-Archibugi & Zurn (Eds.), New modes of governance in the global system. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krasner, S. (Ed.). (1983). International regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lake, D. (2009). Hierarchy in international relations. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Lee, T. (2013). Global cities and transnational climate change networks. Global Environmental Politics, 13(1), 108–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marschinski, R., & Behrle, S. (2009). The World Bank: Making the business case for the environment. In N. O. Biermann & N. O. Siebenhüner (Eds.), Managers of global change. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  35. Meckling, J. (2011). Carbon coalitions: Business, climate politics and the rise of emissions trading. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. Michaelowa, A. and Michaelowa, K. (2011). Climate business for poverty reduction? The role of the World Bank. Review of International Organizations, 6(3–4).Google Scholar
  37. Nielsen, D., & Tierney, M. (2003). Delegation to international organizations: agency theory and world bank environmental reform. International Organization, 57(2), 241–276.Google Scholar
  38. Pattberg, P. (2007). Private institutions and global governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  39. Pattberg, P., & Stripple, J. (2008). Beyond the public and private divide: remapping transnational climate governance in the 21st century. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 8(4), 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Slaughter, A.-M. (2004). A new world order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Stone, R. (2011). Controlling Institutions. International organizations and the global economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Toly, N. (2008). Transnational municipal networks and climate politics: from global governance to global politics. Globalizations, 5(3), 341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Victor, D. (2011). Global warming gridlock: Creating more effective strategies for protecting the planet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wara, M. and Victor, D. (2008). A Realistic Policy on International Carbon Offsetting. PESD Working Paper Number 74. Available at: http://iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/22157/wp74_final_final.pdf
  45. Weaver, C. (2007). The World’s Bank and the Bank’s World. Global Governance, 13(4), 493–512.Google Scholar
  46. Weller, P. & Xu Y.-C. (2010). Agents of influence: country directors at the World Bank. Public Administration, 88(1), 211–231.Google Scholar
  47. World Bank (2001). Global gas flaring initiative: Report on consultations with stakeholders, Report Number 1. Washington DC.Google Scholar
  48. World Bank (2004). A voluntary standard for global gas flaring and venting reduction: Report Number 4. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Blavatnik School of GovernmentOxford UniversityOxfordUK
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations