The Review of International Organizations

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 265–290 | Cite as

“The silent revolution:” How the staff exercise informal governance over IMF lending

  • Jeffrey M. ChwierothEmail author


This paper examines how the staff exercise informal governance over lending decisions of the International Monetary Fund (IMF or Fund). The essential component of designing any IMF program, assessing the extent to which a borrowing country is likely to fulfill its policy commitments, is based partly on informal staff judgments subject to informal incentives and normative orientations not dictated by formal rules and procedures. Moreover, when country officials are unable to commit to policy goals of the IMF, the IMF staff may bypass the formal channel of policy dialogue through informal contacts and negotiations with more like-minded actors outside the policymaking process. Exercising informal governance in these ways, the staff are motived by informal career advancement incentives and normative orientations associated with the organization’s culture to provide favorable treatment to borrowers composed of policy teams sympathetic toward their policy goals. The presence of these sympathetic interlocutors provides the staff both with greater confidence a lending program will achieve success and an opportunity to support officials who share their policy beliefs. I assess these arguments using a new dataset that proxies shared policy beliefs based on the professional characteristics of IMF staff and developing country officials. The evidence supports these arguments: larger loan commitments are extended to countries where government officials and the Fund staff share similar professional training. The analysis implies informal governance operates in IOs not just via state influence but also through the evolving makeup, incentive structure, and normative orientations of their staffs.


IMF Organizational culture Professional training 


F53 F33 

Supplementary material

11558_2012_9154_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (156 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 155 kb)
11558_2012_9154_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (108 kb)
ESM 2 (PDF 108 kb)
11558_2012_9154_MOESM3_ESM.dta (159 kb)
ESM 3 (DTA 159 kb)


  1. Babb, S. (2003). The IMF in sociological perspective: a tale of organizational slippage. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(2), 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baltagi, B., & Wu, P. X. (1999). Unequally spaced panel data regressions with AR(1) disturbances. Econometric Theory, 15, 814–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bank for International Settlements. (2007). Historical time series. Accessed 9 January 2007.
  4. Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, N. (2011). Of fixed-effects and time-invariant variables. Political Analysis, 19(2), 119–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, N., Katz, J. N., & Tucker, R. (1998). Taking time seriously: Time-series-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 1260–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Best, J., & Widmaier, W. (2006). Micro- or macro-moralities? Economic discourses and policy possibilities. Review of International Political Economy, 13(4), 609–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bird, G. (2004). Over-optimism and the IMF. World Economy, 28(9), 1355–1373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boughton, J. (2001). Silent revolution: The international monetary fund, 1979–1989. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  10. Braumoeller, B. F. (2004). Hypothesis testing and multiplicative interaction terms. International Organization, 58(4), 807–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Broz, J. L., & Hawes, M. B. (2006). Congressional politics of financing the international monetary fund. International Organization, 60(2), 367–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carter, D., & Signorino, C. (2010). Back to the future: modeling time dependence in binary data. Political Analysis, 18(3), 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Christiansen, T., & Neuhold, C. (Eds.). (2012). International handbook of informal governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Christiansen, T., & Piattoni, S. (Eds.). (2003). Informal governance in the European union. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Chwieroth, J. (2010a). The IMF and the rise of financial liberalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Chwieroth, J. (2010b). How do crises lead to change?: liberalizing capital controls in the early years of new order Indonesia. World Politics, 62(3), 496–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Colander, D. (2008). The making of an economist, redux. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Colander, D., & Klamer, A. (1987). The making on an economist. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Copelovitch, M. (2010). The international monetary fund in the global economy: Banks, bonds, and bailouts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Vries, M. G. (1985). The international monetary fund 1972–1978, cooperation on trial, volume II: Narrative and analysis. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  21. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Drazen, A. (2002). Conditionality and ownership in IMF lending: a political economy approach. IMF Staff Papers, 49, 36–67.Google Scholar
  23. Dreher, A., & Vaubel, R. (2004). The causes and consequences of IMF conditionality. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 40(3), 26–54.Google Scholar
  24. Fang, S., & Stone, R. W. (2012). International organizations as policy advisors. International Organiation, 66:537–569.Google Scholar
  25. Finch, C. D. (1989). The IMF: The record and the prospect. Princeton, NJ: Department of Economics, Princeton University.Google Scholar
  26. Fischer, S. (1997). Applied economics in action: IMF programs. American Economic Review, 87(2), 23–27.Google Scholar
  27. Fourcade, M. (2009). Economists and societies: Discipline and profession in the United states, Britain, and France, 1890 s to 1990s. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Haggard, S. (1985). The politics of adjustment: lessons from the IMF’s extended fund facility. International Organization, 39(3), 157–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ho, D., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. (2007). Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis, 15(3), 199–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. IMF. (1998). IMF code of conduct for staff. Accessed 22 June 2012.
  31. IMF. (1999). External evaluation of IMF surveillance: Report by a group of independent experts. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  32. IMF. (2004). Biennial review of the implementation of the fund’s surveillance and of the 1977 surveillance decision modalities of surveillance. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  33. IMF. (2012). Factsheet: The IMF at a glance. Accessed 1 April 2012.
  34. Independent Evaluation Office (IEO). (2003). The IMF and recent capital account crises: Indonesia, Korea, Brazil. Washington, DC: IEO.Google Scholar
  35. Independent Evaluation Office (IEO). (2009). IMF interactions with member countries. Washington, DC: IEO.Google Scholar
  36. Ivanova, A., Mayer, W., Mourmouras, A., & Anayiotos, G. (2003). What determines the success or failure of IMF programs? IMF working paper 03/08. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  37. James, H. (1996). International monetary cooperation since Bretton woods. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  38. Kahler, M. (1992). External influence, conditionality, and the politics of adjustment. In S. Haggard & R. R. Kaufman (Eds.), The politics of economic adjustment (pp. 89–136). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Kahler, M. (1993). Bargaining with the IMF: Two-level strategies and developing countries. In P. B. Evans, H. K. Jacobsen, & R. D. Putnam (Eds.), Double-edged diplomacy: International bargaining and domestic politics (pp. 363–394). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  40. Kaufman, R. R. (1989). The politics of economic adjustment policy in Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico: experiences in the 1980s and challenges for the future. Policy Sciences, 22, 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Klamer, A., & Colander, D. (1990). The making of an economist. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  42. Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., & Snidal, D. (2001). The rational design of international institutions. International Organization, 55(4), 761–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Martin, L. (2006). Distribution, information, and delegation to international organizations: The case of IMF conditionality. In D. A. Lake, D. L. Nielson, & M. J. Tierney (Eds.), Delegation and agency in international organizations (pp. 140–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Momani, B. (2005). IMF Staff: missing link in fund reform proposals. Review of International Organizations, 2(1), 39–57.Google Scholar
  45. Mussa, M., & Savastano, M. (1999). The IMF approach to economic stabilization. IMF working paper WP/99/104. Washingto: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  46. Nelson, S. (2009). Creating credibility: The international monetary fund and the neoliberal revolution in the developing world. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University, Department of Government.Google Scholar
  47. Oatley, T., & Yackee, J. (2004). American interests and IMF lending. International Politics, 41(3), 41–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Plümper, T., & Troeger, V. (2007). Efficient estimation of time-invariant and rarely changing variables in panel data analysis with unit effects. Political Analysis, 15(2), 124–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reinhart, C., & Rogoff, K. (2008). This time is different: Eight centuries of financial folly. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Southard, F. A. (1979). The evolution of the international monetary fund. Princeton, NJ: Department of Economics, Princeton University.Google Scholar
  51. Steinwand, M., & Stone, R. W. (2008). The international monetary fund: a review of the recent evidence. Review of International Organizations, 3(2), 123–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stone, R. W. (2002). Lending credibility: The international monetary fund and the post-communist transition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Stone, R. W. (2008). The scope of IMF conditionality. International Organization, 62(4), 589–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stone, R. W. (2011). Controlling institutions: International organizations and the global economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Strange, S. (1988). States and markets. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  56. Teichman, J. A. (2001). The politics of freeing markets in Latin America: Chile, Argentina, and Mexico. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  57. Vaubel, R. (1996). Bureaucracy at the IMF and the World Bank. World Economy, 19(2), 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vreeland, J. (2003). The IMF and economic development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Willett, T. D. (2002). Toward a broader public-choice analysis of the international monetary fund. In D. M. Andrews, C. R. Henning, & L. Pauly (Eds.), Governing the world’s money (pp. 60–77). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Woods, N. (2006). The globalizers: The IMF, the world bank, and their borrowers. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of International RelationsLondon School of EconomicsLondonUK

Personalised recommendations