The Review of International Organizations

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 177–202 | Cite as

Looking in the mirror: Comparing INGO networks across issue areas

Article

Abstract

International Relations scholarship has begun to focus a great deal of attention on social networks and their influence on political outcomes. In this paper, we contribute to this effort by examining the network relationships of international non-governmental organizations (INGOs) across four issues areas: the environment, health, human rights, and development. Using originally coded data on over 4000 INGOs, we find that the characteristics of network relations across the four areas are in fact quite different. Further, we find that these differences are driven in part by the characteristics of the INGOs, including whether they are located in the global North or South and their ties to intergovernmental organizations. Finally, we highlight the crucial “bridge” role of organizations that focus on a “hybrid” of multiple issue-areas within the overall network.

Keywords

INGO Non-governmental organizations Networks Human rights Development Environment Health 

Supplementary material

11558_2011_9134_MOESM1_ESM.zip (367 kb)
ESM1 (ZIP 366 kb)

References

  1. Abelson, A. (2003). Ngo networks: strength in numbers. Office of Private and Voluntary Cooperation. US AID.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed, S., & Potter, D. M. (2006). NGOs in international politics. Bloomfield: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aldashev, G., & Verdier, T. (2010). Goodwill bazaar: NGO competition and giving to development. Journal of Development Economics, 91(1), 48–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alger, C. (2002). The emerging roles of the NGOs in the un system: from article 71 to a people’s millennium assembly. Global Governance, 8(1), 93.Google Scholar
  5. Anheier, H., & Katz, H. (2004). Network approaches to global civil society. Global Civil Society, 5, 206–221.Google Scholar
  6. Boli, J., & Brewington, D. (2007). Religious international nongovernmental organizations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, New York, New York City, Aug 11, 2007.Google Scholar
  7. Boli, J., & Thomas, G. (1999). INGOs and the Organization of World Culture. In Boli and Thomas (Eds.), Constructing world culture: international non-governmental organizations since 1875, (pp 107–123). Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Borgatti, SP, MG Everett and LC Freeman. 2006. UCINET 6 Social Network Analysis Software v. 6.125.Google Scholar
  9. Breitmeier, H., & Rittberger, V. (2000). Environmental NGOs in an emerging global civil society. In The global environment in the twenty-first century: Prospects for international cooperation (pp. 130–163). United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Caniglia, B. S. (2001). Informal alliances vs. institutional ties: The effects of elite alliance on environmental TSMO networks. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 6(1), 37–54.Google Scholar
  11. Carapico, S. (2000). NGOs, INGOs, GO-NGOs and DO-NGOs: Making Sense of NonGovernmental Organizations. Middle East Report, 30(1), 12–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chiang, P. (1981). Non-governmental organizations at the United Nations: Identity, role, and function. Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Cho, W. K. T., & Fowler, J. H. (2010). Legislative success in a small world: social network analysis and the dynamics of congressional legislation. Journal of Politics, 72(1), 124–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark, A. M., Friedman, E. J., & Hochstetler, K. (1998). The sovereign limits on global civil society: a comparison of NGO participation in UN world conferences on the environment, human rights, and women. World Politics, 51(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clark, C., Sprenger, E., & VeneKlasen, L. (2006). Where is the money for women's rights? URL:http://awid.org/eng/About-AWID/AWID-Initiatives/Where-is-the-Money-for-Women-s-Rights
  16. Cliff, A.D., & Ord, J.D. (1973). Spatial Autocorrelation. Pion.Google Scholar
  17. Cooley, A., & Ron, J. (2002). The NGO scramble: Organizational insecurity and the political economy of transnational action. International Security, 27(1), 3–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Covey, J. G. (1995). Accountability and effectiveness in NGO policy alliances. Journal of International Development, 7, 857–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DeMars, W. E. (2005). NGOs and transnational networks: Wild cards in world politics. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  20. Dieng, A. (2001). The contribution of NGOs to the prevention of human rights violations. In L. A. Sicilanos (Ed.), The prevention of human rights violations. The Hague: Kluwar Law International.Google Scholar
  21. Ebrahim, A. (2005). NGOs and organizational change: Discourse, reporting and learning. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Eccleston, B. (1996). Does north-south collaboration enhance NGO influence on deforestation policies in Malaysia and Indonesia? Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 34(1), 66–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (1996). Too close for comfort? the impact of official aid on nongovernmental organizations. World Development, 24(6), 961–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elliot, C. (1987). Some aspects of relations between the north and south in the ngo sector. World Development, 15(1), S57–S68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fisher, J. (1998). Nongovernment: NGOs and the political development of the third world. Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  26. Fisher, W. F. (1997). Doing good? the politics and antipolitics of NGO practices. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 439–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fowler, A. (1992). Distant obligations: Speculations of NGO funding and the global market. Review of African Political Economy, 19(55), 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Glasius, M. (2002). Expertise in the cause of justice: Global civil society influence of the statute for an international criminal court. Global Civil Society pp. 137–168.Google Scholar
  29. Glasius, M. (2006). The International Criminal Court: a global civil society achievement. Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Hamdani, A. (2006). Lack of coordination between INGO's regarding schulter kits during Pakistan earthquake. Sphere Project. URL: http://www.sphereproject.org/content/view/176/83/lang,english/
  31. Hanneman, R.A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to Social Network Methods. Published in digital form at http://faculty.ucr.edu/ hanneman/ed. University of California, Riverside.
  32. Hulme, D., & Edwards, M. (1997). NGOs, states and donors: Too close for comfort? Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  33. James, R. (1994). Strengthening the capacity of southern NGO partners. INTRAC: The International NGO Training and Research Centre. Occasional Paper Series Number 5.Google Scholar
  34. Kaiser, M. (2008). Mean clustering coefficients: The role of isolated nodes and leafs on clustering measures for small-world networks. New Journal of Physics, 10, 83042–83053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kamran, A.Z. (2009). Human security networks in the Indian Ocean tsunami. Political Networks Paper Archive. Working Papers. Southern Illinois University Carbondale.Google Scholar
  36. Katz, H. (2006). Gramsci, hegemony, and global civil society networks. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 17(4), 332–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Keck, M.E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kelly, R.E. (2005).’A lot more than the NGOs seem to think': The impact of non-governmental organizations on the Bretton Woods Institutions. Dissertation. Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  39. Kogut, B., & Walker, G. (2001). The small world of Germany and the durability of national networks. American Sociological Review, 66(3), 317–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lake, D.A., & Wong, W. (2009). The politics of networks: Interests, power, and human rights norms. In Kahler, M. (Ed), Networked politics: Agency, power, governance. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Landman, T. (2005). Protecting human rights: A comparative study. Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Lazer, D., & Friedman, A. (2006). The dark side of the small world: How efficient information diffusion drives out diversity and lowers collective problem solving ability. Harvard Program on Networked Governance Working Paper No. 06–001.Google Scholar
  43. Manji, F. (1997). Collaboration with the South: Agents of aid or solidarity? Development in Practice, 2(2), 175–178.Google Scholar
  44. Manji, F., & O’Coill, C. (2002). The missionary position: NGOs and development in Africa. International Affairs, 78(3), 567–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mawdsley, E., Townsend, J. G., & Porter, J. (2005). Trust, accountability, and face-to-face interaction in North-South NGO relations. Development in Practice, 15(1), 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mercer, A., Khan, M. H., Daulatuzzaman, M., & Reid, J. (2004). Effectiveness of an NGO primary health care programme in rural Bangladesh: evidence from the management information system. Health Policy Plan, 19(4), 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Milgram, S. (1967). The small world problem. Psychology today, 2(1), 60–67.Google Scholar
  48. Murdie, A. (2009). Signals without borders: The conditional impact of INGOs. PhD Thesis. Emory University.Google Scholar
  49. Najam, A. (1996). NGO accountability: A conceptual framework. Development Policy Review, 14(4), 339–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nelson, P.J., & Dorsey, E. (2008). New rights advocacy: changing strategies of development and human rights NGOs. Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Neumayer, E. (2005). Do international human rights treaties improve respect for human rights? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(6), 925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Newman, M.E.J., Barabasi, A.L., & Watts, D.J. (2006). The structure and dynamics of networks. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Nunnenkamp, P., & Öhler, H. (2010). Funding, competition and the efficiency of NGOs: An empirical analysis of non-charitable expenditure of US NGOs engaged in foreign aid. Courant Research Centre: Poverty, Equity and Growth - Discussion Papers 38, Courant Research Centre PEG.Google Scholar
  54. Okafor, O.B. (2006). Legitimizing human rights Ngos: Lessons from Nigeria. Africa World Press.Google Scholar
  55. Otto, D. (1996). Nongovernmental organizations in the United Nations system: The emerging role of international civil society. Human Rights Quarterly, 18, 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Petras, J. (1999). NGOs: In the service of imperialism. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 29(4), 429–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Price, R. (2003). Reversing the gun sights: Transnational civil society targets land mines. International Organization, 52(3), 613–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Raustiala, K. (1997). States, NGOs, and international environmental institutions. International Studies Quarterly, 41(4), 719–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Risse, Thomas & Steven C. Ropp. (1999). International human rights norms and domestic change. In Risse, T., Ropp, S.C., Sikkink, K. (Eds), The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (pp. 234–278). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Rutherford, K. R. (2000). The evolving arms control agenda: Implications of the role of NGOs in banning antipersonnel landmines. World Politics, 53(1), 74–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Salm, J. (1999). Coping with globalization: A profile of the northern NGO sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(suppl 1), 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: the power of organizing without organizations. Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  63. Siegel, D. A. (2009). Social networks and collective action. American Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 122–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Simmons, P.J. (1998). Learning to live with NGOs. Carnegie Endowment for International PeaceGoogle Scholar
  65. Sinani, E., Stafsudd, A., Thomsen, S., Edling, C., & Randøy, T. (2008). Corporate governance in Scandinavia: comparing networks and formal institutions. European Management Review, 5(1), 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Smith, J. (2002). Bridging global divides?: Strategic framing and solidarity in transnational social movement organizations. International Sociology, 17(4), 505–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Smith, J. (2005). Building bridges or building walls? explaining regionalization among transnational social movement organizations. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 10(2), 251–269.Google Scholar
  68. Smith, J., & Wiest, D. (2005). The uneven geography of global civil society: National and global influences on transnational association. Social Forces, 84(2), 621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stroup, S. (2008). Varieties of activism: The national origins of international NGOs. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  70. Taylor, R. (2002). Interpreting global civil society. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 13(4), 339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. UIA. 2001/2002. Yearbook of International Organizations. CD-Rom. K.G. Saur.Google Scholar
  72. UN. (2008). Consultative status with the UN. URL: http://www.un.org/esa/coordination/ngo/
  73. UN ECOSOC. (2009). Report of the commit of non-governmental organizations on its 2009 regular session. E/2009/32. March 4.Google Scholar
  74. Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. (2005). Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2), 447–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Van Tuijl, P. (2000). Entering the global dealing room: reflections on a rights-based framework for NGOs in international development. Third World Quarterly, 21(4), 617–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wamai, R. (2008). Reforming health systems: the role of NGOs in decentralization: lessons from Kenya and Ethiopia. URL: http://www.istr.org/conferences/barcelona/WPVolume/Wamai.pdf
  77. Warkentin, C. (2001). Reshaping World Politics: NGOs, the Internet, and Global Civil Society. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  78. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Watts, D. J. (2004). The new science of networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 243–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Small world. Nature, 393, 440–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Watts, D.J., & Strogatz, S.H. (2006). Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Wieczorek-Zeul, H. (Ed). (2005). UN system engagement with NGOs, civil society, the private sector, and other actors. UN Non-Governmental Liaison Service.Google Scholar
  83. Willetts, P. (2000). From ‘consultative arrangements’ to ‘partnership’: The changing status of NGOs in diplomacy at the UN. Global Governance, 6(2), 191–212.Google Scholar
  84. Willetts, P. (2002). What is a non-governmental organization? UNESCO encyclopedia of life support systems. URL: http://www.sta_.city.ac.uk/p.willetts/CS-NTWKS/NGO-ART.HTM
  85. Wong, W. (2008). Centralizing principles: How Amnesty International shapes human rights politics through its transnational network. PhD thesis. UCSD.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  2. 2.Emory UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations