Trust in international organizations: An empirical investigation focusing on the United Nations

Article

Abstract

The literature on social capital has strongly increased in the last two decades, but there still is a lack of substantial empirical evidence about the determinants of international trust. This empirical study analyzes a cross-section of individuals, using micro-data from the World Values Survey, covering 38 countries, to investigate trust in international organizations, specifically in the United Nations. In line with previous studies on international trust we find that political trust matters. We also find that social trust is relevant, but contrary to previous studies the results are less robust. Moreover, the paper goes beyond previous studies investigating also the impact of geographic identification, corruption and globalization. We find that a higher level of (perceived) corruption reduces the trust in the UN in developed countries, but increases trust in developing and transition countries. A stronger identification with the world as a whole also leads to a higher trust in the UN and a stronger capacity to act globally in economic and political environment increases trust in the UN.

Keywords

International organizations United Nations International trust Political trust Social trust Corruption Globalization 

JEL

Codes Z130 D730 O190 

Notes

Acknowledgments

For advice and suggestions thanks are due to Doris Aebi and two anonymous referees.

References

  1. Abed, G. T., & Gupta, S. (Eds.) (2002). Governance, corruption and economic performance. Washington: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  2. Aldrich, J. H., Sullivan, J. L., & Borgida, E. (1989). Foreign affairs and issue voting: Do president candidates ‘waltz before a blind audience?’ American Political Science Review, 83, 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2002). Who trust others? Journal of Public Economics, 85, 207–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, G. M., & Tollison, R. D. (1992). Morality and monopoly: The constitutional political economy of religious rules. CATO Journal, 13, 373–391.Google Scholar
  5. Bartels, L. (1995). The American public’s defense spending preferences in the post-cold war era. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58, 479–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brewer, P. R., Aday, S., & Gross, K. (2005). Do Americans trust other nations? A panel study. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 36–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brewer, P. R., Gross, K., Aday, S., & Willnat, L. (2004). International trust and public opinion about world affairs. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brewer, P. R., & Steenbergen, M. R. (2002). All against all: How beliefs about human nature shape foreign policy opinions. Political Psychology, 23, 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1984). How people organize the political world: A schematic model. American Journal of Political Science, 28, 95–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dreher, A. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied Economics, 38, 1091–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dreher, A., & Schneider, F. (2006). Corruption and the shadow economy: An empirical analysis. CREMA Working Paper 2006–1, Basel.Google Scholar
  12. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. Economic Journal, 110, 918–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gambetta, D. (1988). Trust, making and breaking cooperative relations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Glaeser, E., Laibson, D., Scheinkman, J. A., & Soutter, C. L. (2000). Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 811–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hall, A., Rudebusch, G., & Wilcox, D. (1996). Judging instrument relevance in instrumental variable estimation. International Economic Review, 37, 283–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hardin, R. (1993). The street-level epistemology of trust. Politics and Society, 21, 505–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hartog, J., Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Jonker, N. (2002). Linking measured risk aversion to individual characteristics. Kyklos, 55, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hetherington, M. J. (1998). The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review, 92, 791–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hull, B. B., & Bold, F. (1994). Hell, religion, and cultural change. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 150, 447–464.Google Scholar
  20. Iannaccone, L. R. (2002). A marriage made in heaven? Economic theory and religious studies. In S. Grossbard-Shechtman, & C. Clague (Eds.), The expansion of economics (pp. 163–193). New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  21. Inglehart, R., et al. (2000). Codebook for world values survey. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  22. Jackman, R. W., & Miller, R. A. (1998). Social capital and politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 1, 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2003). Governance matters III: Governance indicators for 1996–2002. World Bank, June, 30.Google Scholar
  24. Knack, S. (1999). Social capital and the quality of government: Evidence from the U.S. States. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series: 2504.Google Scholar
  25. Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 4, 1251–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15, 222–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levin, M., & Satarov, G. (2000). Corruption and institutions in Russia. European Journal of Political Economy, 16, 13–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller, A. H. (1974). Political issues and trust in government: 1964–1970. American Political Science Review, 68, 951–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Schaltegger, C. A., & Torgler, B. (2007). Government accountability and fiscal discipline: A panel analysis with Swiss data. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shapiro, R. Y., & Jacobs, L. W. (2000). Who leads and who follows? U.S. presidents, public opinion, and foreign policy. In B. L. Nacos, R. Y. Shapiro, & P. Isernia (Eds.), Decision-making in a glass house: Mass media, public opinion, and American and European foreign policy in the 21st centruy (pp. 223–245). New York: Rowan and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  32. Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sniderman, P. M., & Citrin, J. (1971). Psychological sources of political beliefs: Self-esteem and insolationist attitudes. American Political Science Review, 65, 401–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tanzi, V. (2002). Corruption around the world: Causes, consequences, scope, and cures. In G. T. Abed & S. Gupta (Eds.), Governance, corruption and economic performance (pp. 19–58). Washington: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  35. Tittle, C. (1980) Sanctions and social deviance: The question of deterrence. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  36. Tittle, C., & Welch, M. (1983). Religiosity and deviance: Toward a contingency theory of constraining effects. Social Forces, 61, 653–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Torgler, B. (2007). Tax compliance and tax morale: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  38. Torgler, B., & García-Valiñas, M. A. (2007). The determinants of individuals’ attitudes towards preventing environmental damage. Ecological Economics.Google Scholar
  39. Treisman, D., (2000). The cause of corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76, 399–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundation of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27, 151–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zak, P. J., & Knack, S. (2001). Trust and growth. Economic Journal, 111, 295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and FinanceQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.CREMA—Center for Research in Economics, Management and the ArtsBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations