Advertisement

Mycological Progress

, Volume 16, Issue 8, pp 811–821 | Cite as

Hodophilus (Clavariaceae, Agaricales) species with dark dots on the stipe: more than one species in Europe

  • Slavomír AdamčíkEmail author
  • Soňa Jančovičová
  • Brian P. Looney
  • Katarína Adamčíková
  • Gareth W. Griffith
  • Thomas Læssøe
  • Pierre-Arthur Moreau
  • Alfredo Vizzini
  • P. Brandon Matheny
Original Article

Abstract

Hodophilus atropunctus is traditionally defined as the only species of this genus with dark brown or black dots on the stipe. Multi-locus phylogenetic reconstruction recognised two distinct clades morphologically corresponding to this species concept. The limited morphological description in the protologue of H. atropunctus and absence of a type specimen were limitations in an assignment of this name to one of the recognised phylogenetic species. The emended species concept and the selection of a neotype are based on careful analyses of the colour of the basidiomata and how this changes during maturation and drying. The name H. atropunctus is assigned to the paler of the two species which also shows colour change across the pileus and along the length of the stipe when dry. The second darker species is described here as new, H. variabilipes, but only seven out of 14 collections examined belonging to this taxon had distinct dark coloured dots on the stipe surface.

Keywords

Agaricoid Camarophyllopsis Multi-locus phylogeny Morphology Type studies 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Matúš Adamčík, Katarína Devánová, David Harries, Juraj Hermann, Christophe Lécuru, Paul Pirot and Václav Kautman for their contribution of specimens, photographs and/or assistance with field work. We also thank the staff and curators of the herbarium at K for a loan of herbarium material. The research of SA, KA and SJ was granted by the national grant Vega 02/0075/14 and a grant from Slovak-American Foundation to SA. The research of SA and GG was supported by Stapledon fellowship and Natural Resources Wales Grant REF Project: GU9433. TL was supported by a grant to the Danish Atlas Project from Aage V. Jensens Naturfond.

Supplementary material

11557_2017_1318_MOESM1_ESM.docx (66 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 65 kb)

References

  1. Adamčík S, Looney BP, Birkebak JM, Jančovičová S, Adamčíková K, Marhold K, Matheny PB (2016) Circumscription of species of Hodophilus (Clavariaceae, Agaricales) in North America with naphthalene odours. Botany 94:941–956. doi: 10.1139/cjb-2016-0091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adamčík S, Jančovičová S, Looney BP, Adamčíková K, Birkebak JM, Moreau P-A, Vizzini A, Matheny PB (2017) Circumscription of species in the Hodophilus foetens complex (Clavariaceae, Agaricales) in Europe. Mycol Prog 16:47–62. doi: 10.1007/s11557-016-1249-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnolds E (1990) Camarophyllopsis. In: Bas C, Kuyper TW, Noordeloos ME, Vellinga EC (eds) Flora Agaricina Neerlandica, vol 2. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 111–115Google Scholar
  4. Birkebak JM, Mayor JR, Ryberg M, Matheny PB (2013) A systematic, morphological, and ecological overview of the Clavariaceae (Agaricales). Mycologia 105:896–911. doi: 10.3852/12-070 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Birkebak JM, Adamčík S, Matheny PB (2016) Multilocus phylogenetic reconstruction of the Clavariaceae (Agaricales) reveals polyphyly of the agaricoid members. Mycologia 108(5):860–868. doi: 10.3852/15-370 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Boertmann D (2012) Camarophyllopsis Herink. In: Knudsen H, Vesterholt J (eds) Funga Nordica, 2nd edn. Nordsvamp, Copenhagen, pp 242–244Google Scholar
  7. Bon M (1977) Clé analytique des Hygrophoraceae (suite). Le Genre Hygrophorus Fr. Doc Mycol 7(27–28):25–51Google Scholar
  8. Bresadola G (1928) Iconographia mycologica, vol. 6. Societa botanica italiana. Museo civico di storia naturale di Trento, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooke MC (1884) Illustrations of British fungi, vol 3. Williams and Norgate, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Fries EM (1821) Systema Mycologicum 1. Lundae, Ex Officina BerlinoianaGoogle Scholar
  11. Fries EM (1874) Hymenomycetes europaei. Ed. Berling, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  12. Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes - application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2:113–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gouy M, Guindon S, Gascuel O (2010) SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol Biol Evol 27:221–224. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp259 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Heim R (1969) Les champignons d’Europe: Généralités – Ascomycètes – Basidiomycètes, 2nd edn. N. Boubée, ParisGoogle Scholar
  15. Hesler LR, Smith AH (1963) North American species of Hygrophorus. The University of Tennessee Press, KnoxvilleCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Horak E (2005) Röhrlinge und Blätterpilze in Europa. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  17. Kornerup A, Wanscher JH (1967) Methuen handbook of colour, 2nd edn. Methuen Co., LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Kovalenko AE, Malysheva EF, Morozova OV (2012) The genus Camarophyllopsis in Russia: new records and new species C. albofloccipes. Mikol Fitopatol 46:54–66 [In Russian]Google Scholar
  19. Lanfear R, Calcott B, Kainer D, Mayer C, Stamatakis A (2014) Selecting optimal partitioning schemes for phylogenomic datasets. BMC Evol Biol 14:82. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-14-82 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Lange JE (1938) Studies in the agarics of Denmark, part XII. Dan Bot Ark 9(6):1–105Google Scholar
  21. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23(21):2947–2948. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Larsson A (2014) AliView: a fast and lightweight alignment viewer and editor for large datasets. Bioinformatics 30(22):3276–3278. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu531 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Matheny PB (2005) Improving phylogenetic inference of mushrooms with RPB1 and RPB2 nucleotide sequences (Inocybe; Agaricales). Mol Phylogenet Evol 35:1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.11.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Moser M (1978) Keys to agarics and Boleti. Roger Phillips, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Persoon CH (1801) Synopsis methodica fungorum, vol 2. Apud Henricum Dieterich, GottingaeGoogle Scholar
  26. Phillips W (1878) Hygrophorus foetens Nov. Spec. Grevillea 7(42):74–76Google Scholar
  27. Printz P, Læssøe T (1986) Vokshatteslægten Camarophyllopsis i Danmark. Svampe 14:83–92Google Scholar
  28. Quélet L (1877) Quelques especes de champignons nouvellement observées dans le Jura, dans les Vosges et aux environs de Paris. B Soc Bot Fr 24:317–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Quélet L (1898) Quelques espèces critiques ou nouvelles de la flore mycologique de la France. CR Assoc Fr Sci 26:446–453Google Scholar
  30. Ronquist F, Huelsenback J, Teslenko M (2011) MrBayes version 3.2. http://mrbayes.sourceforge.net/. Accessed 11 Mar 2016
  31. Silvestro D, Michalak I (2012) raxmlGUI: a graphical front-end for RAxML. Org Divers Evol 12:335–337. doi: 10.1007/s13127-011-0056-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith WG (1875) New and rare Hymenomycetous fungi. J Bot 13:97–99Google Scholar
  33. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J (2008) A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst Biol 57:758–771. doi: 10.1080/10635150802429642 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Vellinga EC (1988) Glosary. In: Bas C, Kuyper TW, Noordeloos ME, Vellinga EC (eds) Flora Agaricina Neerlandica, vol 1. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 54–69Google Scholar
  35. White TJ, Bruns T, Taylor LS (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and application. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, pp 322–315Google Scholar

Copyright information

© German Mycological Society and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Slavomír Adamčík
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Soňa Jančovičová
    • 3
  • Brian P. Looney
    • 2
  • Katarína Adamčíková
    • 4
  • Gareth W. Griffith
    • 5
  • Thomas Læssøe
    • 6
  • Pierre-Arthur Moreau
    • 7
  • Alfredo Vizzini
    • 8
  • P. Brandon Matheny
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Botany, Plant Science and Biodiversity CenterSlovak Academy of SciencesBratislavaSlovakia
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolution BiologyUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Botany, Faculty of Natural SciencesComenius University in BratislavaBratislavaSlovakia
  4. 4.Branch for Woody Plants Biology, Institute of Forest EcologySlovak Academy of Sciences ZvolenNitraSlovakia
  5. 5.IBERSAberystwyth UniversityAberystwythUK
  6. 6.Natural History Museum of Denmark/Department of BiologyKøbenhavn ØDenmark
  7. 7.Université de Lille, Fac. Pharma. Lille, Laboratoire IMPECSLilleFrance
  8. 8.Department of Life Sciences and Systems BiologyUniversity of TurinTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations