Advertisement

Mycological Progress

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 769–774 | Cite as

Craterellus indicus sp. nov., a new species associated with Cedrus deodara from the western Himalayas, India

  • Deepika Kumari
  • R. C. Upadhyay
  • M. S. Reddy
Original Article

Abstract

Craterellus indicus is proposed here as a new species, resulting from a morphological and molecular study on the diversity of Cantharellaceae in the western Himalayan region of India. The species is characterized by a pale brownish to creamish pileus and a smooth to folded hymenium that is distinctly detached from the stipe apex. There are no clamp connections. The combination of characters makes this species distinct from other known species of Craterellus. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of partial large subunit (LSU) and the ITS region of the nuclear ribosomal operon supports its position as a new species.

Keywords

Cantharellaceae Cantharellus Internal transcribed spacer (ITS) Large subunit (LSU) of rDNA 

References

  1. Akaike H (1981) Likelihood of a model and information criteria. J Econometrics 16:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bigelow HE (1978) The Cantharelloid fungi of New England and adjacent area. Mycologia 70:704–755Google Scholar
  3. Corner EJH (1966) A monograph of Cantharelloid fungi. Oxford University Press, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  4. Dahlman M, Danell E, Spatafora JW (2000) Molecular systematics of Craterellus cladistic analysis of nuclear LSU rDNA sequence data. Mycol Res 104:388–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feibelman T, Bayam P, Cibula WG (1994) Length variation in the internal transcribed spacer of ribosomal DNA in Cantharallae. Mycol Res 98:614–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hall TA (1999) Bio Edit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98Google Scholar
  7. Hibbett DS, Pine EM, Langer E, Langer G, Donoghue MJ (1997) Evolution of gilled mushrooms and puffballs inferred from ribosomal DNA sequences. USA: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 94:12002–12006Google Scholar
  8. Kirk PM, Cannon PF, Minter DW, Stalpers JA (2008) Dictionary of the fungi, 10th edn. CAB International, Wallingford, p 640Google Scholar
  9. Kumari D, Upadhyay RC, Reddy MS (2009) New records of family Cantharellaceae from India. Mushroom Res 18:47–50Google Scholar
  10. Mearz A, Paul MA (1930) A Dictionary of Colour. Mc Graw-Hill Book Company Inc, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Moncalvo JM, Nilsson RH, Koster B, Dunham SM, Bernauer T, Matheny PB, Porter TM, Margaritescu S, Weiß M, Garnica S, Danell E, Langer G, Langer E, Larsson E, Larsson KH, Vilgalys R (2006) The cantharelloid clade: dealing with incongruent gene trees and phylogenetic reconstruction methods. Mycologia 98:937–948PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nylander JAA (2004) MrModeltest, version 2.3. Available from http://www.abc.se/~nylander/
  13. Page RD (1996) TreeView: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput Appl Biosci 12:357–358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Petersen RH (1976) Notes on Cantharelloid fungi. IX. Illustrations of new or poorly understood taxa. Nova Hedwigia 31:1–23Google Scholar
  15. Pilz D, Norvell L, Danell E, Molina R (2003) Ecology and management of commercially harvested Chanterelle mushrooms. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-576. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, p 83Google Scholar
  16. Rambaut A, Drummond AJ (2007) Tracer -- MCMC Trace Analysis Tool Version v1.4. Available from: http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer
  17. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Singer R (1986) The Agaricales in modern taxonomy, 4th edn. Koeltz Scientific Books, KoenigsteinGoogle Scholar
  19. Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  20. Thind KS, Rattan SS (1972) Thelephoraceae of India. V Trans Brit Mycol Soc 59:123–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Van Kan JAL, Van den Ackerveken GFJM, de Wit PJGM (1991) Cloning and characterization of the cDNA of avirulence avr9 of the fungal pathogen Cladosporium fulvum the casual agent of tomato leaf mold. Mol Plant Microbe Int 4:52–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vilgalys R, Hester M (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriol 172:4238–4246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. White T, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 315–322Google Scholar

Copyright information

© German Mycological Society and Springer 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deepika Kumari
    • 1
    • 2
  • R. C. Upadhyay
    • 2
  • M. S. Reddy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiotechnologyThapar UniversityPatialaIndia
  2. 2.Directorate of Mushroom ResearchSolanIndia

Personalised recommendations