Advertisement

Mycological Progress

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 41–49 | Cite as

Taxon-specific fungal primers reveal unexpectedly high diversity during leaf decomposition in a stream

  • Liliya G. Nikolcheva
  • Felix Bärlocher
Article

Abstract

Traditional techniques for studying the fungal community composition in streams favour the detection and identification of aquatic hyphomycetes. Our objective was to use molecular techniques to determine the presence and contributions of other fungal groups. We designed primers specific for the ITS regions in Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Chytridiomycota, Zygomycota and Oomycota. The primers were used to amplify DNA from linden, maple, and beech leaves, and birch wood submerged in a stream for 4 weeks in summer, autumn, winter and spring. The amplification products were separated by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Ascomycota were present in large phylotype numbers (up to 21) on all substrates and all dates and represented ≥ 75 % of the fungal biomass. Basidiomycota were the second most abundant group in summer and autumn (up to 13 % on wood) and were absent only on linden and maple in spring. There were consistently large numbers of phylotypes from Chytridiomycota and their relative contribution to the microbial community peaked in winter on all substrates. Oomycota were present in summer and abundant only on wood. Zygomycota were present in low numbers and their estimated contribution to fungal biomass was ≤ 1%. Using primers to target individual groups facilitates a more balanced approach to studying fungal diversity in freshwater ecosystems.

Keywords

Microbial Community Fungal Community Fungal Biomass Freshwater Ecosystem Balance Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexopoulos CJ, Mims CW, Blackwell M (1996) Introductory Mycology. Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Allan JD (1995) Stream ecology: structure and function of running waters. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  3. Bago B, Picke Y, Simon L (1998) Fluorescently-primed in situ PCR in arbuscular mycorrhizas. — Mycological Research 102: 761–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bärlocher F (1987) Aquatic hyphomycete spora in 10 streams in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. — Canadian Journal of Botany 65: 76–79.Google Scholar
  5. Bärlocher F (1992a) Community organization. In Bärlocher F (ed) The ecology of aquatic hyphomycetes, pp. 38–76. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  6. Bärlocher F (1992b) Seasonal occurrence and movements of fungi in streams. In Khulbe RD (ed) Microbial Activity in the Himalaya, pp. 3–29. Shree Almora Book Depot, U.P. Himalaya, India.Google Scholar
  7. Bärlocher F, Kendrick B (1974) Dynamics of the fungal population on leaves in a stream. — Journal of Ecology 62: 761–791.Google Scholar
  8. Baschien C, Manz W, Neu TR, Szwezyk U (2001) Fluorescence in situ hybridization of freshwater fungi. — International Review of Hydrobiology 86: 371–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Belliveau M (2003) Molecular phylogeny of aquatic hyphomycetes. Honours thesis, Mt. Allison University, Sackville, Canada.Google Scholar
  10. Bermingham S, Maltby L, Dewey FM (1996) Monoclonal antibodies as tools to quantify mycelium of aquatic hyphomyetes. — New Phytologist 132: 593–601.Google Scholar
  11. Bruns TD (2001) ITS reality. — Inoculum 52: 2–3.Google Scholar
  12. Buchan A, Newell SY, Moreta JIL, Moran MA (2002) Analysis of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions of rRNA genes in fungal communities in a southeastern U. S. salt marsh. — Microbial Ecology 43: 329–340.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Buchan A, Newell SY, Butler M, Biers EJ, Hollibaugh JT, Moran MA (2003) Dynamics of bacterial and fungal communities on decaying salt marsh grass. — Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69: 6676–6687.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooke WB (1976) Fungi in sewage. In Jones EBG (ed) Recent advances in aquatic mycology, pp. 389–434. Paul Elek, London.Google Scholar
  15. Corpet F (1988) Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. — Nucleic Acids Research 16: 10881–10890.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes — application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. — Molecular Ecology 2: 113–118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gessner MO, Bärlocher F, Chauvet E (2003) Qualitative and quantitative analyses of aquatic hyphomycetes in streams. — Fungal Diversity Research Series 10: 127–157.Google Scholar
  18. Goh TK, Hyde KD (1996) Biodiversity of freshwater fungi. — Journal of Industrial Microbiology 17: 328–345.Google Scholar
  19. Head IM, Sanders JR, Pickup RW (1998) Microbial evolution, diversity and ecology: a decade of ribosomal analysis of uncultivated organisms. — Microbial Ecology 35: 1–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaushik NK, Hynes HBN (1971) The fate of the dead leaves that fall into streams. — Archiv für Hydrobiologie 68: 465–515.Google Scholar
  21. Larena I, Salazar O, Gonzales V, Julian MC, Rubio V (1999) Design of a primer for ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer with enhanced specificity for ascomycetes. — Journal of Biotechnologoy 75: 187–194.Google Scholar
  22. Lee SB, Taylor JW (1992) Phylogeny of the five fungus-like protoctistan Phytophthora species, inferred from the internal transcribed spacers of ribosomal DNA. — Molecular Biology and Evolution 9: 636–653.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. McArthur FA, Baerlocher MO, Maclean NAB, Hiltz MD, Bärlocher F (2001) Asking probing questions: can fluorescent in situ hybridization identify and localise aquatic hyphomycetes on leaf litter? — International Review of Hydrobiology 86: 429–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Muyzer GE, De Waal C, Uitterlinden AG (1993) Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction — amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. — Applied and Environmental Microbiology 59: 695–700.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nikolcheva LG (2003) Fungal diversity on plant litter in streams: traditional and molecular approaches. MSc thesis, Mt. Allison University, Sackville, Canada.Google Scholar
  26. Nikolcheva LG, Cockshutt AM, Bärlocher F (2003) Diversity of freshwater fungi on decaying leaves —comparing traditional and molecular approaches. — Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69: 2548–2554.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Park D (1972) Methods of detecting fungi in organic detritus in water. — Transactions of the British Mycological Society 58: 281–290.Google Scholar
  28. Powell MJ (1993) Looking at mycology with a Janus face: a glimpse at Chytridiomycetes active in the environment. — Mycologia 85: 1–20.Google Scholar
  29. Rossi L, Fano EA, Bassett A, Fanelli C, Fabri AA (1983) An experimental study of a microfungal community on plant detritus in a mediterranean woodland stream. — Mycologia 75: 887–896.Google Scholar
  30. Shearer CA (1992) The role of woody debris. In Bärlocher F (ed) The ecology of aquatic hyphomycetes, pp. 77–98. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  31. Shearer CA (1993) The freshwater Ascomycetes. — Nova Hedwigia 56: 1–33.Google Scholar
  32. Shearer CA, Von Bodman SB (1983) Patterns of occurrence of Ascomycetes associated with decomposing twigs in a mid-western stream. — Mycologia 75: 518–530.Google Scholar
  33. Suberkropp K, Klug MJ (1976) Fungi and bacteria associated with leaves during processing in a woodland stream. — Ecology 57: 707–719.Google Scholar
  34. Suberkropp K, Weyers H (1996) Application of fungal and bacterial production methodologies to decomposing leaves in streams. — Applied and Environmental Microbiology 62: 1610–1615.Google Scholar
  35. Waterhouse GM (1942) Some water moulds of the Hogsmill River collected from 1937–1939. — Transactions of the British Mycological Society 25: 315–325.Google Scholar
  36. Webster J (1959) Experiments with spores of aquatic hyphomycetes. I Sedimentation, and impaction on smooth surfaces. — Annals of Botany 23: 595–611.Google Scholar
  37. Webster J (1992) Anamorph-teleomorph relationships. In Bärlocher F (ed) The ecology of aquatic hyphomycetes, pp. 99–117. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  38. Webster J, Davey RA (1984) Sigmoid conidial shape in aquatic fungi. — Transactions of the British Mycological Society 83: 43–52.Google Scholar
  39. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications, pp. 315–322. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Willoughby LG, Redhead K (1973) Observations on the utilization of soluble nitrogen by aquatic fungi in nature. — Transactions of the British Mycological Society 60: 598–601.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© DGfM 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. BiologyMt. Allison UniversitySackvilleCanada

Personalised recommendations