Mycological Progress

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 187–199 | Cite as

The Exobasidiales: An evolutionary hypothesis

  • Dominik Begerow
  • Robert Bauer
  • Franz Oberwinkler


To gain insight in the phylogenetic relationships within the Exobasidiales, septal pore apparatus, host-parasite interactions, sori, hymenia, basidia, and nucleotide sequences from the 5′ terminal domain of the nuclear large subunit rRNA gene were studied and compared.

The results of our molecular phylogenetic analyses correlate well with the morphological data and both reflect the distribution of parasites on several host groups. Thus, the Exobasidiales seem to be divided into four groups, which are distinguishable by basidial morphology and host range as follows: (i) the Exobasidiaceae parasitizing mainly Ericanae are characterized by an abaxial orientation of the hilar appendices of the ballistosporic basidiospores on the elongate basidia, (ii) the Cryptobasidiaceae occurring mainly on Lauraceae sporulate inside the host tissue with elongate gastroid basidia, (iii) the Brachybasidiaceae living on monocots are characterized by elongate basidia bearing two ballistosporic basidiospores with adaxially oriented hilar appendices, and (iv) the Graphiolaceae occurring on palms produce chains of gastroid basidia in distinct basidiocarps. The arrangement of the four groups and the tree topology within Exobasidium derived from the molecular analyses essentially parallel phylogenetic host relationships, suggesting cospeciation. Based on our results, however, the radiation of Exobasidium on Vaccinioideae cannot be explained by cospeciation alone.


Tree Topology Large Subunit Morphological Data Terminal Domain Evolutionary Hypothesis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Apg (1998) An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. — Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 531–553.Google Scholar
  2. Bandoni RJ, Johri BN (1975) Observation on the genus Exobasidiellum. — Canadian Journal of Botany 53: 2561–2564.Google Scholar
  3. Bauer R, Begerow D, Oberwinkler F (1998) Fortschritte in der Systematik der Brandpilze. — Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz 105: 224–238.Google Scholar
  4. Bauer R, Oberwinkler F, Vánky K (1997) Ultrastructural markers and systematics in smut fungi and allied taxa. — Canadian Journal of Botany 75: 1273–1314.Google Scholar
  5. Bauer R, Vánky K, Begerow D, Oberwinkler F (1999) Ustilaginomycetes on Selaginella. — Mycologia 91: 475–484.Google Scholar
  6. Bauer R, Begerow D, Oberwinkler F, Piepenbring M, Berbee ML (2001a) Ustilaginomycetes. In McLaughlin DJ, McLaughlin EG, Lemke PA (eds) Mycota VII Part B. Systematics and evolution, pp. 57–83. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Bauer R, Begerow D, Nagler A, Oberwinkler F (2001b) The Georgefischeriales: a phylogenetic hypothesis. — Mycological Research 105: 416–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Begerow D, Bauer R, Boekhout T (2000) Phylogenetic placements of ustilaginomycetous anamorphs as deduced from nuclear LSU rDNA sequences. — Mycological Research 104: 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Begerow D, Bauer R, Oberwinkler F (1997) Phylogenetic studies on large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences of smut fungi and related taxa. — Canadian Journal of Botany 75: 2045–2056.Google Scholar
  10. Begerow D, Bauer R, Oberwinkler F (2001) Muribasidiospora: Microstromatales or Exobasidiales? — Mycological Research 105: 798–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berndt R, Sharma ND (1998) Dicellomyces calami sp. nov. from India. — Mycological Research 102: 1484–1486.Google Scholar
  12. Blanz P, Döring H (1995) Taxonomic relationships in the genus Exobasidium (Basidiomycetes) based on ribosomal DNA analysis. — Studies in Myology 38: 119–128.Google Scholar
  13. Blanz P, Oberwinkler F (1983) A contribution to the species definition in the genus Exobasidium (Basidiomycetes). — Systematic and Applied Microbiology 4: 199–206.Google Scholar
  14. Brooks DR (1988) Macroevolutionary comparisons of host and parasite phylogenies. — Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19: 235–259.Google Scholar
  15. Brooks DR, Bandoni SM (1988) Coevolution and relicts. — Systematic Zoology 37: 19–33.Google Scholar
  16. Cole GT (1983) Graphiola phoenicis: a taxonomic enigma. — Mycologia 75: 93–116.Google Scholar
  17. Cunningham JL, Bakshi BK, Lentz PL (1976) Two new genera of leaf-parasitic fungi (Basidiomycetidae: Brachybasidiaceae). — Mycologia 68: 640–654.Google Scholar
  18. Derx HG (1930) Étude sur les Sporobolomycètes. — Annales Mycologici 28: 1–23.Google Scholar
  19. Donk MA (1956) The generic names proposed for hymenomycetes-VI. Brachybasidiaceae, Cryptobasidiaceae, Exobasidiaceae. — Reinwardtia 4: 113–118.Google Scholar
  20. Döring H, Blanz P (2000) 18S rDNA-Analysen bei der Gattung Exobasidium. — Hoppea 61: 85–100.Google Scholar
  21. Fischer E (1921) Zur Kenntnis von Graphiola and Farysia. — Annales Mycologici 18: 118–197.Google Scholar
  22. Fischer E (1922) Weitere Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Gattung Graphiola. — Annales Mycologici 20: 228–237.Google Scholar
  23. Gäumann E (1922) Über die Gattung Kordyana Rac. — Annales Mycologici 20: 257–271.Google Scholar
  24. Hendrichs M, Bauer R, Oberwinkler F (2002) The Cryptobasidiaceae of the new world. Sydowia (subm.).Google Scholar
  25. Hennings P (1900) Exobasidiineae. In: Engler A, Prantl K (eds) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 1,1, pp. 103–105. Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  26. Ingold CT (1985) Dicellomyces scirpi: its conidial stage and taxonomic position. — Transactions of the British Mycological Society 84: 542–545.Google Scholar
  27. Ingold CT (1995) Products of teliospore germination in Tilletia hyalospora. — Mycological Research 99: 1247–1248.Google Scholar
  28. Jeannmougin F, Thompson JD, Gouy M, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1998) Multiple sequence alignment with Clustal X. — Trends in Biochemical Sciences 23: 403–405.Google Scholar
  29. Kron KA, Chase MW (1993) Systematics of the Ericaceae, Empetraceae, Epacridaceae and related taxa based upon rbcL sequence data. — Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 735–741.Google Scholar
  30. Kron KA, Powell EA, Luteyn JL (2002) Phylogenetic relationships within the blueberry tribe (Vaccinieae, Ericaceae) based on sequence data from MATK and nuclear ribosomal ITS regions, with comments on the placements of Satyria. — American Journal of Botany 89: 327–336.Google Scholar
  31. Lendner A (1920) Un champignon parasite sur une Lauracée du genre Ocotea. — Bulletin de l’Herbier Boissier Genève 12: 122–128.Google Scholar
  32. Malençon G (1953) Le Coniodyctium chevalieri Har. et Pat., sa nature et ses affinités. — Bulletin de la Société Mycologique de France 69: 77–100.Google Scholar
  33. Maublanc MA (1914) Les genres Drepanoconis Schr. et Henn. et Clinoconidium Pat.: leur structure et leur place dans la classification. — Bulletin de la Société Mycologique de France 30: 444–446.Google Scholar
  34. Mendgen K, Welter K, Scheffold F, Knauf-Beiter G (1991) High pressure freezing of rust infected plant leaves. In Mendgen K, Lesemann, DE (eds) Electron microscopy of plant pathogens, pp. 31–42. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Mims CW, Richardson EA, Roberson RW (1987) Ultrastructure of basidium and basidiospore development in three species of the fungus Exobasidium. — Canadian Jounal of Botany 65: 1236–1244.Google Scholar
  36. Nannfeldt JA (1981) Exobasidium, a taxonomic reassessment applied to the European species. — Symbolae Botanicae Upsalienses 23/2: 1–71.Google Scholar
  37. Oberwinkler F (1977) Das neue System der Basidiomyceten. In Frey W, Hurka H, Oberwinkler F (eds) Beiträge zur Biologie der niederen Pflanzen, pp. 59–105. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, Jena, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Oberwinkler F (1978) Was ist ein Basidiomycet? — Zeitschrift für Mykologie 44: 13–29.Google Scholar
  39. Oberwinkler F (1982) The significance of the morphology of the basidium in the phylogeny of basidiomycetes. In Wells K, Wells EK (eds) Basidium and basidiocarp, pp. 9–35. Springer Verlag, New York, Heidelberg, Berlin.Google Scholar
  40. Oberwinkler F (1987) Heterobasidiomycetes with ontogenetic yeast stages-systematic and phylogenetic aspects. — Studies in Mycology 30: 61–74.Google Scholar
  41. Oberwinkler F (1993) Diversity and phylogenetic importance of tropical heterobasidiomycetes. In Isaac S, Frankland JC, Watling R, Whalley AJS (eds) Aspects of tropical mycology, pp. 121–147. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Oberwinkler F, Bandoni RJ, Blanz P, Deml G, Kisimova-Horovitz L (1982). Graphiolales: basidiomycetes parasitic on palms. — Plant Systematics and Evolution 140: 251–277.Google Scholar
  43. Olive LS (1945) A new Dacrymyces-like parasite of Arundinaria. — Mycologia 37: 543–552.Google Scholar
  44. Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. — Bioinformatics 14: 817–818.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Rajendren RB (1968) Muribasidiospora-a new genus of the Exobasidiaceae. — Mycopathology 36: 218–222.Google Scholar
  46. Roy BA (2001) Patterns of association between crucifers and their flowering-mimic pathogenes: host jumps are more common than coevolution or cospeciation. — Evolution 55: 41–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Savile DBO (1959a) Notes on Exobasidium. — Canadian Journal of Botany 37: 641–656.Google Scholar
  48. Savile DBO (1959b) The Botany of Sommerset Island, district of Franklin. — Canadian Journal of Botany 37: 959–1002.Google Scholar
  49. Swofford DL, Olsen GJ, Waddell PJ, Hillis DM (1996) Phylogenetic inference. In Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK (eds) Molecular systematics, pp 407–514. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  50. Swofford DL (1998) PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  51. Sydow H (1926) Fungi in itinere costaricensi collecti. Pars secunda. — Annales Mycologici 24: 283–288Google Scholar
  52. Vánky, K, Bauer R (1996) Ingoldiomyces, a new genus of Ustilaginales. — Mycotaxon 59: 277–287.Google Scholar
  53. Welter K, Müller M, Mendgen K (1988) The hyphae of Uromyces appendiculatus within the leaf tissue after high pressure freezing and freeze substitution. — Protoplasma 147: 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© DGfM 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dominik Begerow
    • 1
  • Robert Bauer
    • 1
  • Franz Oberwinkler
    • 1
  1. 1.Botanisches Institut, Lehrstuhl Spezielle Botanik und MykologieUniversität TübingenTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations