Radiation-free methods for navigated screw placement in slipped capital femoral epiphysis surgery
- 58 Downloads
For orthopedic procedures, surgeons utilize intra-operative medical images such as fluoroscopy to plan screw placement and accurately position the guide wire with the intended trajectory. The number of fluoroscopic images needed depends on the complexity of the case and skill of the surgeon. Since more fluoroscopic images lead to more exposure and higher radiation dose for both surgeon and patient, a solution that decreases the number of fluoroscopic images would be an improvement in clinical care.
This article describes and compares three different novel navigation methods and techniques for screw placement using an attachable Inertial Measurement Unit device or a robotic arm. These methods provide projection and visualization of the surgical tool trajectory during the slipped capital femoral epiphysis procedure.
These techniques resulted in faster and more efficient preoperative calibration and set up times compared to other intra-operative navigation systems in our phantom study. We conducted an experiment using 120 model bones to measure the accuracy of the methods.
As conclusion, these approaches have the potential to improve accuracy of surgical tool navigation and decrease the number of required X-ray images without any change in the clinical workflow. The results also show 65% decrease in total error compared to the conventional manual approach.
KeywordsSlipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery Computer-aided intervention Inertial measurement unit
This research was internally funded by the Sheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation at Children’s National Health System.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Supplementary material 1 (MP4 5836 kb)
- 1.Rohilla R, Singh R, Magu N, Devgan A, Siwach R, Sangwan S (2011) Simultaneous use of cannulated reamer and schanz screw for closed intramedullary femoral nailing. ISRN Surg (published online)Google Scholar
- 5.Walti J, Jost GF, Cattin PC (2014) A new cost-effective approach to pedicular screw placement. Augment Environ Comput Assist Interv Lect Notes Comput Sci 8678(2014):90–97Google Scholar
- 7.Diotte B, Fallavollita P, Wang L, Weidert S, Thaller P, Euler E, Navab N (2012) Radiation-free drill guidance in interlocking of intramedullary nails. In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, Berlin, pp 18–25Google Scholar
- 18.Koutenaei BA, Guler O, Wilson E, Thoranaghatte RU, Oetgen M, Navab N, Cleary K (2014) Improved screw placement for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) using robotically-assisted drill guidance. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, vol 17, no. 01, pp 488–495Google Scholar
- 21.Madgwick SOH, Harrison AJL, Vaidyanathan R (2011) Estimation of IMU and MARG orientation using a gradient descent algorithm. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics (ICORR), pp 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/icorr.2011.5975346
- 22.Koutenaei BA, Guler O, Wilson E, Oetgen M, Grimm P, Navab N, Cleary K (2015) Inertial measurement unit for radiation-free navigated screw placement in slipped capital femoral epiphysis surgery. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, Cham, pp 355–362Google Scholar