Advertisement

Interactive patient-customized curvilinear reformatting for improving neurosurgical planning

  • Shin-Ting WuEmail author
  • Wallace Souza Loos
  • Dayvid Leonardo de Castro Oliveira
  • Fernando Cendes
  • Clarissa L. Yasuda
  • Enrico Ghizoni
Original Article
  • 55 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Visualizing a brain in its native space plays an essential role during neurosurgical planning because it allows the superficial cerebral veins and surrounding regions to be preserved. This paper describes the use of a visualization tool in which single gadolinium contrast-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging was applied in nondefective and nonresective skulls to promote visualization of important structures.

Methods

A curvilinear reformatting tool was applied on the supratentorial compartment to peel the tissues to the depth of the dura mater and thereby revealing cortical and vascular spatial relationships. The major advantage of our proposed tool is that it does not require coregistration of anatomical and vascular volumes.

Results

The reliability of this technique was supported by comparisons between preoperative images and digital photographs of the brain cortical surface obtained after the dura mater was removed in 20 patients who underwent surgery in the Clinics Hospital of the University of Campinas from January 2017 to April 2018.

Conclusion

Single fat-suppressed GAD contrast-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance scans provide accurate preoperative 3D views of cortical and vascular relationships similar to neurosurgeons’ intraoperative views. In developing countries with limited access to state-of-the-art health technologies, this imaging approach may improve the safety of complex neurosurgeries.

Keywords

Neurosurgical planning Curvilinear reformatting Exploratory visualization Vascular landmarks 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Alisson V. S. Lima for helping with the exhaustive validation tests. This study was supported by a CNPq-Brazil fellowship (305785/2012-5, 308764/2015-3), a CNPq-Brazil scholarship (165777/2014-1), a Fapesp Individual Project Grant (#2011/02351-0), a Fapesp-Brazil Grant (#2013/07559-3) to the BRAINN Research, Innovation and Dissemination Center of the University of Campinas, and a SAE-Unicamp scholarship.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Informed consent

The volunteers enrolled in the present study signed an informed consent form approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Campinas.

Supplementary material

11548_2018_1878_MOESM1_ESM.docx (4.6 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 4662 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Bastos AC, Comeau RM, Andermann F, Melanson D, Cendes F, Dubeau F, Fontaine S, Tampieri D, Olivier A (1999) Diagnosis of subtle focal dysplastic lesions: curvilinear reformatting from three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 46(1):88–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bi WL, Brown PA, Abolfotoh M, Al-Mefty O, Mukundan S, Dunn IF (2015) Utility of dynamic computed tomography angiography in the preoperative evaluation of skull base tumors. J Neurol 123(1):1–8Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gering DT, Nabavi A, Kikinis R, Hata N, O’Donnell LJ, Grimson WE, Jolesz FA, Black PM, Wells WM (2001) An integrated visualization system for surgical planning and guidance using image fusion and an open MR. J Magn Reson Imaging 13(6):967–975.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hamid OA, Hasaballah MS, Hamdy TAH (2014) The lower border of the zygomatic arch could be a better landmark for the middle fossa dura: Cadaveric dissection study. Egypt J Ear Nose Throat Allied Sci 15(3):177–181.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejenta.2014.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huempfner-Hierl H, Bohne A, Schaller A, Wollny G, Hierl T (2015) Does facial soft tissue protect against zygomatic fractures? Results of a finite element analysis. Head Face Med.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-015-0078-5 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huppertz HJ, Kassubek J, Altenmüller DM, Breyer T, Fauser S (2008) Automatic curvilinear reformatting of three-dimensional MRI data of the cerebral cortex. NeuroImage 39(1):80–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Iglesias JE, Liu CY, Thompson PM, Tu Z (2011) Robust brain extraction across datasets and comparison with publicly available methods. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 30(9):1617–1634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Loos WS, Yasuda CL, Cendes F, Wu ST (2017) Cortical envelope modeling for interactive patient-customized curvilinear reformatting in the native space. In: Cardoso M et al (eds) Imaging for patient-customized simulations and systems for point-of-care ultrasound (BIVPCS 2017, POCUS 2017), lecture notes in computer science, vol 10549. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mäntylä M (1987) An introduction to solid modeling. Computer Science Press Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moringlane JR, Bartylla K, Hagen T, Waziri A (1997) Stereotactic neurosurgery planning with 3-D spiral CT-angiography. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 40:83–86.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1053422 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nowell M, Sparks R, Zombori G, Miserocchi A, Rodionov R, Diehl B, Wehner T, White M, Ourselin S, McEvoy A, Duncan J (2016) Resection planning in extratemporal epilepsy surgery using 3D multimodality imaging and intraoperative MRI. Br J Neurosurg 31(4):468–470.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2016.1265086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sellers G, Wright RS, Haemel N (2015) OpenGL superbible: comprehensive tutorial and reference, 7th edn. Addison-Wesley, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith SM (2002) Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 17(3):143–155.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.10062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tubbs RS, O’Neil JT, Key CD, Zarzour JG, Fulghum SB, Kim EJ, Lyerly M, Shoja MM, Salter EG, Oakes WJ (2007) Superficial temporal artery as an external landmark for deeper-lying brain structures. Clin Anat 20:498–501.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Weiskopf D, Engel K, Ertl T (2003) Interactive clipping techniques for texture-based volume visualization and volume shading. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 9(3):298–312.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2003.1207438.3,8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu ST, Valente AC, de Souza Watanabe L, Yasuda CL, Coan AC, Cendes F (2014) Pre-alignment for co-registration in native space. In: 2014 27th SIBGRAPI conference on graphics, patterns and images, pp 41–48Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wu ST, Yasuda CL, Cendes F (2012) Interactive curvilinear reformatting in native space. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 18(2):299–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© CARS 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of CampinasCampinasBrazil
  2. 2.School of Medical SciencesUniversity of CampinasCampinasBrazil
  3. 3.BRAINN - Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and NeurotechnologyResearch, Innovation and Dissemination CentersCampinasBrazil

Personalised recommendations