An oral and maxillofacial navigation system for implant placement with automatic identification of fiducial points
- 41 Downloads
Surgical navigation system (SNS) has been an important tool in surgery. However, the complicated and tedious manual selection of fiducial points on preoperative images for registration affects operational efficiency to large extent. In this study, an oral and maxillofacial navigation system named BeiDou-SNS with automatic identification of fiducial points was developed and demonstrated.
To solve the fiducial selection problem, a novel method of automatic localization for titanium screw markers in preoperative images is proposed on the basis of a sequence of two local mean-shift segmentation including removal of metal artifacts. The operation of the BeiDou-SNS consists of the following key steps: The selection of fiducial points, the calibration of surgical instruments, and the registration of patient space and image space. Eight cases of patients with titanium screws as fiducial markers were carried out to analyze the accuracy of the automatic fiducial point localization algorithm. Finally, a complete phantom experiment of zygomatic implant placement surgery was performed to evaluate the whole performance of BeiDou-SNS.
Results and conclusion
The coverage of Euclidean distances between fiducial marker positions selected automatically and those selected manually by an experienced dentist for all eight cases ranged from 0.373 to 0.847 mm. Four implants were inserted into the 3D-printed model under the guide of BeiDou-SNS. And the maximal deviations between the actual and planned implant were 1.328 mm and 2.326 mm, respectively, for the entry and end point while the angular deviation ranged from 1.094° to 2.395°. The results demonstrate that the oral surgical navigation system with automatic identification of fiducial points can meet the requirements of the clinical surgeries.
KeywordsSurgical navigation Oral and maxillofacial surgery Automatic identification Target registration error Fiducial registration error
This work was supported by grants from National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFB1302903; 2017YFB1104100), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81828003), the Foundation of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (16441908400;18511108200), Shanghai Jiao Tong University Foundation on Medical and Technological Joint Science Research (YG2016ZD01; YG2015MS26), and SJTU-KTH Collaborative Research and Development Seed Grants.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 6.Balachandran R, Fritz MA, Dietrich MS, Danilchenko A, Mitchell JE, Oldfield VL, Lipscomb WW, Fitzpatrick JM, Neimat JS, Konrad PE, Labadie RF (2014) Clinical testing of an alternate method of inserting bone-implanted fiducial markers. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 9(5):913–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Kobler JP, Díaz JD, Fitzpatrick JM, Lexow GJ, Majdani O, Ortmaier T (2014) Localization accuracy of sphere fiducials in computed tomography images. Proc SPIE 9036:2–7Google Scholar
- 8.McRackan TR, Balachandran R, Blachon GS, Mitchell JE, Noble JH, Wright CG, Fitzpatrick JM, Dawant BM, Labadie RF (2013) Validation of minimally invasive, image-guided cochlear implantation using advanced bionics, cochlear, and medel electrodes in a cadaver model. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 8(6):989–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Zhang Y, Shen X, Hu Y (2017) Face registration and surgical instrument tracking for image-guided surgical navigation. In: International conference on virtual reality and visualization. IEEE, pp 65–71Google Scholar
- 19.Deng C, Li S, Bian F, Yang Y (2015) Remote sensing image segmentation based on mean shift algorithm with adaptive bandwidth. Commun Comput Inf Sci 482:179–185Google Scholar