Conditions for reliable grip force and jaw angle estimation of da Vinci surgical tools
- 94 Downloads
This work presents an estimation technique as well as corresponding conditions which are necessary to produce an accurate estimate of grip force and jaw angle on a da Vinci surgical tool using back-end sensors alone.
This work utilizes an artificial neural network as the regression estimator on a dataset acquired from custom hardware on the proximal and distal ends. Through a series of experiments, we test the effect of estimation accuracy due to change in operating frequency, using the opposite jaw, and using different tools. A case study is then presented comparing our estimation technique with direct measurements of material response curves on two synthetic tissue surrogates.
We establish the following criteria as necessary to produce an accurate estimate: operate within training frequency bounds, use the same side jaw, and use the same tool. Under these criteria, an average root mean square error of 1.04 mN m in grip force and 0.17 degrees in jaw angle is achieved. Additionally, applying these criteria in the case study resulted in direct measurements which fell within the 95% confidence bands of our estimation technique.
Our estimation technique, along with important training criteria, is presented herein to further improve the literature pertaining to grip force estimation. We propose the training criteria to begin establishing bounds on the applicability of estimation techniques used for grip force estimation for eventual translation into clinical practice.
KeywordsGrip force estimation Surgical robotics Artificial neural network
Research was sponsored in part by the Army Research Laboratory and was accomplished under Cooperative Agreement No. W911NF-14-2-0035. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Army Research Laboratory or the US Government. The US Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation herein. Additionally, this material is based upon work supported in part by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. 00039202. Any opinion, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
This article does not contain patient data.
- 1.Anooshahpour F, Polushin IG, Patel RV (2014) Quasi-static modeling of the da Vinci instrument. In: International conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS). IEEE, pp 1308–1313Google Scholar
- 5.Dockter R, O’Neill J, Stephens T, Kowalewski T (2016) Feasibility of tissue classification via da Vinci endowrist surgical tool. In: Hamlyn symposium on medical robotics, pp 64–65Google Scholar
- 7.Foresee FD, Hagan MT (1997) Gauss–Newton approximation to Bayesian learning. IEEE Int Conf Neural Netw 3:1930–1935Google Scholar
- 8.Hecht-Nielsen R (1987) Kolmogorov’s mapping neural network existence theorem. In: Proceedings of the international conference on neural networks. IEEE Press, pp 11–14Google Scholar
- 9.Holoborodko P (2008) Smooth noise robust differentiators. http://HrBwww.holoborodko.com/pavel/numerical-methods/numerical-deriHrBvative/smooth-low-noise-differentiators/
- 11.Kehoe B, Kahn G, Mahler J, Kim J, Lee A, Lee A, Nakagawa K, Patil S, Boyd WD, Abbeel P, Goldberg K (2014) Autonomous multilateral debridement with the raven surgical robot. In: International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp 1432–1439Google Scholar
- 13.Kim U, Kim YB, Seok DY, So J, Choi HR (2016) A new type of surgical forceps integrated with three-axial force sensor for minimally invasive robotic surgery. In: 2016 13th international conference on ubiquitous robots and ambient intelligence (URAI). IEEE, pp 135–137Google Scholar
- 14.Kong NJ, Stephens TK, ONeill JJ, Kowalewski TM (2017) Design of a portable dynamic calibration instrument for da Vinci Si tools. In: 2017 design of medical devices conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp V001T11A023–V001T11A023Google Scholar
- 15.Kong NJ, Stephens TK, Kowalewski TM (2018) Da Vinci tool torque mapping over 50,000 grasps and its implications on grip force estimation accuracy. In: 2018 international symposium on medical robotics (ISMR). IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
- 20.Li Y, Miyasaka M, Haghighipanah M, Cheng L, Hannaford B (2016) Dynamic modeling of cable driven elongated surgical instruments for sensorless grip force estimation. In: International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp 4128–4134Google Scholar
- 23.Nakai A, Kuwana K, Saito K, Dohi T, Kumagai A, Shimoyama I (2017) Mems 6-axis force-torque sensor attached to the tip of grasping forceps for identification of tumor in thoracoscopic surgery. In: 2017 IEEE 30th international conference on micro electro mechanical systems (MEMS). IEEE, pp 546–548Google Scholar
- 27.Stephens TK, Meier ZC, Sweet RM, Kowalewski TM (2015) Tissue identification through back end sensing on da Vinci endowrist surgical tool. J Med Dev Tech Brief 9(3):030939Google Scholar
- 28.Yamamoto T, Vagvolgyi B, Balaji K, Whitcomb LL, Okamura AM (2009) Tissue property estimation and graphical display for teleoperated robot-assisted surgery. In: International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp 4239–4245Google Scholar