Development of a shoulder-mounted robot for MRI-guided needle placement: phantom study
- 5 Downloads
This paper presents new quantitative data on a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) study, distortion study, and targeting accuracy phantom study for our patient-mounted robot (called Arthrobot). Arthrobot was developed as an MRI-guided needle placement device for diagnostic and interventional procedures such as arthrography.
We present the robot design and inverse kinematics. Quantitative assessment results for SNR and distortion study are also reported. A respiratory motion study was conducted to evaluate the shoulder mounting method. A phantom study was conducted to investigate end-to-end targeting accuracy. Combined error considering targeting accuracy, respiratory motion, and structure deformation is also reported.
The SNR study showed that the SNR changes only 2% when the unpowered robot was placed on top of a standard water phantom. The distortion study showed that the maximum distortion from the ground truth was 2.57%. The average error associated with respiratory motion was 1.32 mm with standard deviation of 1.38 mm. Results of gel phantom targeting studies indicate average needle placement error of 1.64 mm, with a standard deviation of 0.90 mm.
Noise and distortion of the MR images were not significant, and image quality in the presence of the robot was satisfactory for MRI-guided targeting. Combined average total error, adding mounting stability errors and structure deformation errors to targeting error, is estimated to be 3.4 mm with a standard deviation of 1.65 mm. In clinical practice, needle placement accuracy under 5 mm is considered sufficient for successful joint injection during shoulder arthrography. Therefore, for the intended clinical procedure, these results indicate that Arthrobot has sufficient positioning accuracy.
KeywordsMRI-compatible robot Percutaneous procedures Patient-mounted
This work was partially supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Grants R01EB020003 and R21EB020700.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were IRB-approved and were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Gopinathan A, Peh WCG (2011) Image-guided facet joint injection. Biomed Imaging Interv J 7(1):e4Google Scholar
- 10.Wu FY, Torabi M, Yamadak A, Golden A, Fischer GS, Tuncali K, Frey DD, Walsh C (2013) An MRI coil-mounted multi-probe robotic positioner for cryoablation. In: Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Portland, Oregon, USA, pp 1–9Google Scholar
- 14.Song SE, Tokuda J, Tuncali K, Yamada A, Torabi M, Hata N (2013) Design evaluation of a double ring RCM mechanism for robotic needle guidance in MRI-guided liver interventions. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Tokyo, Japan, pp 4078–4083Google Scholar
- 16.Franco E, Brujic D, Rea M, Gedroyc WM, Ristic M (2015) Needle-guiding robot for laser ablation of liver tumors under MRI guidance. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron PP(99):1–14Google Scholar
- 19.Monfaredi R, Sze R, Safdar N, Sharma K, Cleary K (2013) Patient mounted CT and MRI-compatible shoulder arthrography robot for needle guidance in pediatric interventional procedures. The Hamlyn Symposium on Medical Robotics, London, pp 117–118Google Scholar
- 20.Monfaredi R, Seifabadi R, Iordachita I, Sze R, Safdar NM, Sharma K, Fricke S, Krieger A, Cleary K (2014) A prototype body-mounted MRI-compatible robot for needle guidance in shoulder arthrography. In: Proceedings of IEEE RAS & EMBS Int. Conf. Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), Sao Paulo, Brazil, pp 40–45Google Scholar
- 21.Monfaredi R, Wilson E, Sze R, Sharma K, Azizi B, Iordachita I, Cleary K (2015) Shoulder-mounted robot for MRI-guided arthrography: accuracy and mounting study. In: International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Italy, pp 3643–3646Google Scholar
- 22.Churchill E, McConville JE (1976) Sampling and data gathering strategies for future USAF Anthropometry. Webb Associates, Inc. A/F Aerospace Medical Res 2-76, OHIO, AMRL-TR-74-102 1976Google Scholar
- 23.National Aeronautics and Space Administraion (2018). https://msis.jsc.nasa.gov/sections/section03.htm
- 24.Patricia Rieser (2018) Andorra pediatrics. http://www.andorrapediatrics.com/ap_folders/hand-outs/knowledge/growth.htm