Surgical skills: Can learning curves be computed from recordings of surgical activities?
Surgery is one of the riskiest and most important medical acts that are performed today. The need to improve patient outcomes and surgeon training, and to reduce the costs of surgery, has motivated the equipment of operating rooms with sensors that record surgical interventions. The richness and complexity of the data that are collected call for new methods to support computer-assisted surgery. The aim of this paper is to support the monitoring of junior surgeons learning their surgical skill sets.
Our method is fully automatic and takes as input a series of surgical interventions each represented by a low-level recording of all activities performed by the surgeon during the intervention (e.g., cut the skin with a scalpel). Our method produces a curve describing the process of standardization of the behavior of junior surgeons. Given the fact that junior surgeons receive constant feedback from senior surgeons during surgery, these curves can be directly interpreted as learning curves.
Our method is assessed using the behavior of a junior surgeon in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery over his first three years after residency. They revealed the ability of the method to accurately represent the surgical skill evolution. We also showed that the learning curves can be computed by phases allowing a finer evaluation of the skill progression.
Preliminary results suggest that our approach constitutes a useful addition to surgical training monitoring.
KeywordsSurgical data science Surgical process model DTW Learning curves
Dr François Petitjean is the recipient of an Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Award (Project Number DE170100037) funded by the Australian Government.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 2.Arora KS, Khan N, Abboudi H, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K (2015) Learning curves for cardiothoracic and vascular surgical procedures-a systematic review. Postgrad Med 127(2):202–214Google Scholar
- 3.Barrie J, Jayne DG, Wright J, Murray CJC, Collinson FJ, Pavitt SH (2014) Attaining surgical competency and its implications in surgical clinical trial design: a systematic review of the learning curve in laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 21(3):829–840CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Dewey RA (2007) Psychology: an introduction. Russ DeweyGoogle Scholar
- 11.Forestier G, Riffaud L, Jannin P (2015) Automatic phase prediction from low-level surgical activities. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10(6):833–841Google Scholar
- 12.Hanzly M, Frederick A, Creighton T, Atwood K, Mehedint D, Kauffman EC, Kim HL, Schwaab T (2014) Learning curves for robot-assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 20:297–303Google Scholar
- 20.Lalys F, Jannin P (2013) Surgical process modelling: a review. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 8(5):1–17Google Scholar
- 21.Lalys F, Riffaud L, Morandi X, Jannin P (2010) Automatic phases recognition in pituitary surgeries by microscope images classification. In: Information processing in computer-assisted interventions. Springer, pp 34–44Google Scholar
- 23.Lin HC, Shafran I, Murphy TE, Okamura AM, Yuh DD, Hager GD (2005) Automatic detection and segmentation of robot-assisted surgical motions. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2005. Springer, pp 802–810Google Scholar
- 30.Neumuth T, Durstewitz N, Fischer M, Strauß G, Dietz A, Meixensberger J, Jannin P, Cleary K, Lemke HU, Burgert O (2006) Structured recording of intraoperative surgical workflows. In: Medical imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 61450A–61450AGoogle Scholar
- 31.PARK1a S-H, Suh IH, Chien J-h, Paik J, Ritter FE, Oleynikov D, Siu K-C (2011) Modeling surgical skill learning with cognitive simulation. Medi Meets Virtual Real 18: NextMed, 163:428Google Scholar
- 34.Ritter FE, Schooler LJ (2001) The learning curve. Int Encycl Social Behav Sci 13:8602–8605Google Scholar
- 39.Sharma Y, Plötz T, Hammerld N, Mellor S, McNaney R, Olivier P, Deshmukh S, McCaskie A, Essa I (2014) Automated surgical osats prediction from videos. In 2014 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI). IEEE, pp 461–464Google Scholar
- 42.Varadarajan B, Reiley C, Lin H, Khudanpur S, Hager G (2009) Data-derived models for segmentation with application to surgical assessment and training. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2009. Springer, pp 426–434Google Scholar